Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:53:23.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Langmuir circulation in shallow waters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2014

W. R. C. Phillips*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn 3122, Australia Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801-2935, USA
A. Dai
Affiliation:
Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, Tamkang University, Taipei 25137, Taiwan Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801-2935, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: wrphilli@illinois.edu

Abstract

The instability of shallow-water waves on a moderate shear to Langmuir circulation is considered. In such instances, specifically at the shallow end of the inner coastal region, the shear can significantly affect the drift giving rise to profiles markedly different from the simple Stokes drift. Since drift and shear are instrumental in the instability to Langmuir circulation, of key interest is how that variation in turn affects onset to Langmuir circulation. Also of interest is the effect on onset of various boundary conditions. To that end the initial value problem describing the wave–mean flow interaction which accounts for the multiple time scales of the surface waves, evolving shear and evolving Langmuir circulation is crafted from scratch, and includes the wave-induced drift and a consistent set of free-surface boundary conditions. The problem necessitates that Navier–Stokes be employed side by side with a set of mean-field equations. Specifically, the former is used to evaluate events with the shortest time scale, that is the wave field, while the mean field set is averaged over that time scale. This averaged set, the CLg equations, follow from the generalized Lagrangian mean equations and for the case at hand take the same form as the well-known CL equations, albeit with different time and velocity scales. Results based upon the Stokes drift are used as a reference to which those based upon drift profiles corrected for shear are compared, noting that the latter are asymptotic to the former as the waves transition from shallow to deep. Two typical temporal flow fields are considered: shear-driven flow and pressure-driven flow. Relative to the reference case, shear-driven flow is found to be destabilizing while pressure driven are stabilizing to Langmuir circulation. In pressure-driven flows it is further found that multiple layers, as opposed to a single layer, of Langmuir circulation can form, with the most intense circulations at the ocean floor. Moreover, the layers can extend into a region of flow beyond that in which the instability applies, suggesting that Langmuir circulation excited by the instability can in turn drive, as a dynamic consequence, contiguous albeit less intense Langmuir circulation. Pressure-driven flows also admit two preferred spacings, one closely in accord with observation for small-aspect-ratio Langmuir circulation, the other well in excess of observed large-aspect-ratio Langmuir circulation.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2014 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, D. G. & McIntyre, M. E. 1978 An exact theory of nonlinear waves on a Lagrangian-mean flow. J. Fluid Mech. 89, 609646.Google Scholar
Babanin, A. V., Ganopolski, A. & Phillips, W. R. C. 2009 Wave-induced upper-ocean mixing in a climate model of intermediate complexity. Ocean Model. 29, 189197.Google Scholar
Blondeaux, P., Brocchini, M. & Vittori, G. 2002 Sea waves and mass transport on a sloping beach. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 458, 20532082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, C. J., Childress, S. & Proctor, M. R. E. 1980 Long wavelength thermal convection between nonconducting boundaries. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 51, 362369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, C. J. & Proctor, M. R. E. 1980 Nonlinear Rayleigh–Benard convection between poorly conducting boundaries. J. Fluid Mech. 101, 759782.Google Scholar
Chini, G. P. & Leibovich, S. 2003 Resonant Langmuir-circulation–internal-wave interaction. Part 1. Internal wave reflection. J. Fluid Mech. 495, 3555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chini, G. P. & Leibovich, S. 2005 Resonant Langmuir-circulation–internal-wave interaction. Part 2. Langmuir circulation instability. J. Fluid Mech. 524, 99120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, S. & Leibovich, S. 1993 Langmuir circulations in a surface layer bounded by a strong thermocline. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 23, 13301345.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, A. D. D. 1977 The generation of Langmuir circulations by an instability mechanism. J. Fluid Mech. 81, 209223.Google Scholar
Craik, A. D. D. 1982 Wave induced longitudinal-vortex instability in shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 125, 3752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, A. D. D. & Leibovich, S. 1976 A rational model for Langmuir circulations. J. Fluid Mech. 73, 401426.Google Scholar
Gargett, A., Wells, J., Tejada-Martinez, A. E. & Grosch, C. E. 2004 Langmuir supercells: a mechanism for sediment resuspension and transport in shallow seas. Science 306, 19251928.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. & Hill, G. W. 1980 Nearshore current pattern off South Texas—an interpretation from aerial photographs. Remote Sens. Environ. 10, 115134.Google Scholar
Langmuir, I. 1938 Surface motion of water induced by wind. Science 87, 119123.Google Scholar
Leibovich, S. 1977 Convective instability of stably stratified water in the ocean. J. Fluid Mech. 82, 561585.Google Scholar
Leibovich, S. 1980 On wave-current interaction theories of Langmuir circulation. J. Fluid Mech. 99, 715724.Google Scholar
Leibovich, S. 1983 The form and dynamics of Langmuir circulations. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 15, 391427.Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1953 Mass transport in water waves. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 245, 535581.Google Scholar
Marmorino, G. O., Smith, G. B. & Lindemann, G. J. 2004 Infrared imagery of ocean internal waves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L11309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmorino, G. O., Smith, G. B. & Lindemann, G. J. 2005 Infrared imagery of large-aspect-ratio Langmuir circulation. Cont. Shelf Res. 25, 16.Google Scholar
Martinat, G., Xu, Y., Grosch, C. & Tejada-Martinez, A. 2011 LES of turbulent surface shear stress and pressure-gradient-driven flow on shallow continental shelves. Ocean Dyn. 61, 13691390.Google Scholar
McIntyre, M. & Norton, W. 1990 Dissipative wave-mean interactions and the transport of vorticity or potential vorticity. J. Fluid Mech. 212, 403435.Google Scholar
McLeish, W. 1968 On mechanisms of wind-slick generation. Deep-Sea Res. 15, 461469.Google Scholar
Melville, W. K., Shear, R. & Veron, F. 1998 Laboratory measurements of the generation and evolution of Langmuir circulations. J. Fluid Mech. 364, 3158.Google Scholar
Moroz, I. M. & Leibovich, S. 1985 Oscillatory and competing instabilites in a nonlinear model for Langmuir circulations. Phys. Fluids 28, 20502061.Google Scholar
Nield, D. A. 1967 The thermohaline Rayleigh–Jeffreys problem. J. Fluid Mech. 29, 545558.Google Scholar
Phillips, W. R. C. 1998 Finite amplitude rotational waves in viscous shear flows. Stud. Appl. Maths 101, 2347.Google Scholar
Phillips, W. R. C. 2001a On an instability to Langmuir circulations and the role of Prandtl and Richardson numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 442, 335358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, W. R. C. 2001b On the pseudomomentum and generalized Stokes drift in a spectrum of rotational waves. J. Fluid Mech. 430, 209220.Google Scholar
Phillips, W. R. C. 2002 Langmuir circulations beneath growing or decaying surface waves. J. Fluid Mech. 469, 317342.Google Scholar
Phillips, W. R. C. 2003 Langmuir circulations. In Wind-Over-Waves II: Forecasting and Fundamentals of Applications (ed. Sajjadi, S. & Hunt, J.), pp. 157167. Horwood Pub.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, W. R. C. 2005 On the spacing of Langmuir circulation in strong shear. J. Fluid Mech. 525, 215236.Google Scholar
Phillips, W. R. C., Dai, A. & Tjan, K. 2010 On Lagrangian drift in shallow-water waves on moderate shear. J. Fluid Mech. 660, 221239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, W. R. C. & Shen, Q. 1996 A family of wave-mean shear interactions and their instability to longitudinal vortex form. Stud. Appl. Maths 96, 143161.Google Scholar
Phillips, W. R. C. & Wu, Z. 1994 On the instability of wave-catalysed longitudinal vortices in strong shear. J. Fluid Mech. 272, 235254.Google Scholar
Phillips, W. R. C., Wu, Z. & Lumley, J. 1996 On the formation of longitudinal vortices in turbulent boundary layers over wavy terrain. J. Fluid Mech. 326, 321341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plueddemann, A., Smith, J., Farmer, D., Weller, R., Crawford, W., Pinkel, R., Vagle, S. & Gnanadesikan, A. 1996 Structure and variability of Langmuir circulation during the surface waves processes program. J. Geophys. Res. 21, 85102.Google Scholar
Smith, J., Pinkel, R. & Weller, R. A. 1987 Velocity structure in the mixed layer during mildex. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 17, 425439.Google Scholar
Smith, J. A. 1992 Observed growth of Langmuir circulation. J. Geophys. Res. 97, 56515664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparrow, E. M., Goldstein, R. J. & Jonsson, V. K. 1964 Thermal instability in a horizontal fluid layer: effect of boundary conditions and non-linear temperature profile. J. Fluid Mech. 18, 513528.Google Scholar
Stokes, G. G. 1847 On the theory of oscillatory waves. Trans. Camb. Phil. Soc. 8, 441455.Google Scholar
Tejada-Martinez, A. & Grosch, C. 2007 Langmuir turbulence in shallow water. Part 2. Large-eddy simulation. J. Fluid Mech. 576, 2761.Google Scholar
Thorpe, S. 2004 Langmuir circulation. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 5579.Google Scholar
Veron, F. & Melville, W. K. 2001 Experiments on the stability and transition of wind-driven water surfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 446, 2565.Google Scholar
Weber, J. & Ghaffari, P. 2009 Mass transport in the Stokes edge wave. J. Mar. Res. 67, 213224.Google Scholar