Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T15:22:56.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Translating and squirming cylinders in a viscoplastic fluid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2019

R. Supekar Open the ORCID record for R. Supekar [Opens in a new window] ,
D. R. Hewitt Open the ORCID record for D. R. Hewitt [Opens in a new window]  and
N. J. Balmforth Open the ORCID record for N. J. Balmforth [Opens in a new window]
R. Supekar*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
D. R. Hewitt
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University College London, 25 Gordon Street, London WC1H 0AY, UK
N. J. Balmforth
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
*
†Email address for correspondence: srohit@mit.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three related problems of viscoplastic flow around cylinders are considered. First, translating cylinders with no-slip surfaces appear to generate adjacent rotating plugs in the limit where the translation speed becomes vanishingly small. In this plastic limit, analytical results are available from plasticity theory (slipline theory) which indicate that no such plugs should exist. Using a combination of numerical computations and asymptotic analysis, we show that the plugs of the viscoplastic theory actually disappear in the plastic limit, albeit very slowly. Second, when the boundary condition on the cylinder is replaced by one that permits sliding, the plastic limit corresponds to a partially rough cylinder. In this case, no plasticity solution has been previously established; we provide evidence from numerical computations and slipline theory that a previously proposed upper bound (Martin & Randolph, Geotechnique, vol. 56, 2006, pp. 141–145) is actually the true plastic solution. Third, we consider how a prescribed surface velocity field can propel cylindrical squirmers through a viscoplastic fluid. We determine swimming speeds and contrast the results with those from the corresponding Newtonian problem.

JFM classification

Low-Reynolds-number flows: Low-Reynolds-number flows Non-Newtonian Flows: Non-Newtonian Flows Non-Newtonian Flows: Plastic materials
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 882 , 10 January 2020 , A11
Copyright
© 2019 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adachi, K. & Yoshioka, N. 1973 On creeping flow of a visco-plastic fluid past a circular cylinder. Chem. Engng Sci. 28 (1), 215–226.Google Scholar
Balmforth, N. J., Craster, R. V., Hewitt, D. R., Hormozi, S. & Maleki, A. 2017 Viscoplastic boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 813, 929–954.Google Scholar
Balmforth, N. J., Frigaard, I. A. & Ovarlez, G. 2014 Yielding to stress: recent developments in viscoplastic fluid mechanics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 46, 121–146.Google Scholar
Barnes, H. A. 1995 A review of the slip (wall depletion) of polymer solutions, emulsions and particle suspensions in viscometers: its cause, character, and cure. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 56 (3), 221–251.Google Scholar
Blake, J. R. 1971a A spherical envelope approach to ciliary propulsion. J. Fluid Mech. 46 (1), 199–208.Google Scholar
Blake, J. R. 1971b Self propulsion due to oscillations on the surface of a cylinder at low Reynolds number. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 5 (2), 255–264.Google Scholar
Brookes, G. F. & Whitmore, R. L. 1969 Drag forces in bingham plastics. Rheol. Acta 8 (4), 472–480.Google Scholar
Chaparian, E. & Frigaard, I. A. 2017 Yield limit analysis of particle motion in a yield-stress fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 819, 311–351.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. J., Finn, M. D. & MacDonald, M. 2014 Hydrodynamic persistence within very dilute two-dimensional suspensions of squirmers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 470 (2167), 20130508.Google Scholar
Crowdy, D. G. & Or, Y. 2010 Two-dimensional point singularity model of a low-Reynolds-number swimmer near a wall. Phys. Rev. E 81 (3), 036313.Google Scholar
Ding, Y., Gravish, N. & Goldman, D. I. 2011 Drag induced lift in granular media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2), 028001.Google Scholar
Harlen, O. G. 2002 The negative wake behind a sphere sedimenting through a viscoelastic fluid. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 108 (1–3), 411–430.Google Scholar
Hewitt, D. R. & Balmforth, N. J. 2017 Taylor’s swimming sheet in a yield-stress fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 828, 33–56.Google Scholar
Hewitt, D. R. & Balmforth, N. J. 2018 Viscoplastic slender body theory. J. Fluid Mech. 856, 870–897.Google Scholar
Hinch, E. J. 1991 Perturbation Methods. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hosoi, A. E. & Goldman, D. I. 2015 Beneath our feet: strategies for locomotion in granular media. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 47, 431–453.Google Scholar
Lauga, E. & Powers, T. R. 2009 The hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms. Rep. Prog. Phys. 72 (9), 096601.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1952 On the squirming motion of nearly spherical deformable bodies through liquids at very small Reynolds numbers. Commun. Pure Appl. Maths 5 (2), 109–118.Google Scholar
Martin, C. M. & Randolph, M. F. 2006 Upper-bound analysis of lateral pile capacity in cohesive soil. Geotechnique 56 (2), 141–145.Google Scholar
Murff, J. D., Wagner, D. A. & Randolph, M. F. 1989 Pipe penetration in cohesive soil. Géotechnique 39 (2), 213–229.Google Scholar
Ouyang, Z., Lin, J. & Ku, X. 2018 The hydrodynamic behavior of a squirmer swimming in power-law fluid. Phys. Fluids 30 (8), 083301.Google Scholar
Ozogul, H., Jay, P. & Magnin, A. 2015 Slipping of a viscoplastic fluid flowing on a circular cylinder. J. Fluids Engng 137 (7), 071201.Google Scholar
Pedley, T. J. 2016 Spherical squirmers: models for swimming micro-organisms. IMA J. Appl. Maths 81 (3), 488–521.Google Scholar
Prager, W. & Hodge, P. G. 1951 Theory of Perfectly Plastic Solids. Wiley.Google Scholar
Randolph, M. F. & Houlsby, G. T. 1984 The limiting pressure on a circular pile loaded laterally in cohesive soil. Géotechnique 34, 613–623.Google Scholar
Roquet, N. & Saramito, P. 2003 An adaptive finite element method for Bingham fluid flows around a cylinder. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng 192, 3317–3341.Google Scholar
Spagnolie, S. E. & Lauga, E. 2010 Jet propulsion without inertia. Phys. Fluids 22 (8), 081902.Google Scholar
Tokpavi, D. L., Magnin, A. & Jay, P. 2008 Very slow flow of Bingham viscoplastic fluid around a circular cylinder. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 154, 65–76.Google Scholar
Tokpavi, D. L., Magnin, A., Jay, P. & Jossic, L. 2009 Experimental study of the very slow flow of a yield stress fluid around a circular cylinder. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 164, 35–44.Google Scholar
Ultman, J. S. & Denn, M. M. 1971 Slow viscoelastic flow past submerged objects. Chem. Engng J. 2 (2), 81–89.Google Scholar
Yazdi, S., Ardekani, A. M. & Borhan, A. 2014 Locomotion of microorganisms near a no-slip boundary in a viscoelastic fluid. Phys. Rev. E 90 (4), 1–11.Google Scholar