Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T12:06:51.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Le rôle de la prosodie dans les premières constructions grammaticales: étude de cas d'un enfant français monolingue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2012

KARINE MARTEL  and
CHRISTELLE DODANE
KARINE MARTEL*
Affiliation:
Université de Caen Basse-Normandie, Laboratoire PALM
CHRISTELLE DODANE*
Affiliation:
Université de Montpellier 3, Laboratoire Dipralang
*
Adresses pour correspondance: Karine Martel, Laboratoire PALM, MRSH SH019, Université de Caen, Basse-Normandie, F-14032 Caen Cedex 5, France e-mail: karine.martel@unicaen.fr
Christelle Dodane, Laboratoire Dipralang, Université Paul Valéry, Montpellier 3, Montpellier, 34199, France e-mail: christelle.dodane@univ-montp3.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

La prosodie, qui fait l'objet d'une acquisition précoce chez le jeune enfant, pourrait contenir des indices (pauses, intonation, accentuation) susceptibles de faciliter la mise en place des premières combinaisons de deux mots et des premières relations syntaxiques. Nous proposons d'examiner les caractéristiques prosodiques des productions de Madeleine, entre 11 et 23 mois. L'analyse acoustique de 550 productions fait apparaître que les premiers mots apparaissent vers 12 mois de façon concomitante à la réalisation accrue de proto-mots bisyllabiques, produits avec des contours montants et montants-descendants, dont la forme temporelle se rapproche de la forme adulte. Les combinaisons de mots émergent ensuite, à partir de 18 mois, caractérisées par un contour d'intonation unique et modulé qui permet d'exprimer leurs liens de dépendance.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of French Language Studies , Volume 22 , Special Issue 1: First language acquisition of French grammar (from 10 months to 4 years old) , March 2012 , pp. 13 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Astésano, C. (2001). Rythme et accentuation en français. Invariance et variabilité stylistique. Paris: Editions L'Harmattan, Collection Langue & Parole.Google Scholar
Astésano, C., Magne, C., El Yagoubi, R. et Besson, M. (2004). Influence du rythme sur le traitement sémantique en français: Approches comportementale et électrophysiologique. Journées d'Études sur la Parole, Fès.Google Scholar
Auchlin, A. et Ferrari, A. (1994). Structure prosodique, syntaxe, discours: évidences et problèmes. Cahiers de linguistique française - Des mots et des discours: études contrastives et perspectives, 15: 187–216.Google Scholar
Bates, E. (1976). Language and Context: The Acquisition of Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Berhens, H. et Gut, U. (2005).The relationship between prosodic and syntactic organization in early multiword speech. Journal of Child Language, 32: 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, L. (1970). Language Development: Form and Function in Emerging Grammars. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1973). One Word at a Time. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. et Weenimk, D. (2009). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 5.1.05) [Computer program.] Retrieved January 1, 2011, from http://www.praat.org/Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1973). Early Syntactic Development: A Cross-Linguistic Study, with Special Reference to Finnish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braine, M. (1963). The ontogeny of English phrase structure: the first phase. Language, 39: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branigan, G. (1979). Some reasons why successive single word utterances are not. Journal of Child Language, 6: 411–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A First Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. et Fraser, C. (1964). The acquisition of syntax. Monographs of the Society for Research. Child Development, 29.1: 43–79.Google Scholar
Clark, E.V. (2003). First Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A. (1997). Intonation. 2nd edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D. (1986). Prosodic development. Dans: Fletcher, P. and Garman, M. (eds), Language Acquisition: Studies in First Language Development. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
D'Odorico, L. et Carubbi, S. (2003). Prosodic characteristics of early multi-word utterances in Italian children. First Language, 23: 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Odorico, L., Fasolo, M. et Marchione, D. (2009). The prosody of early multi-word speech: word order and its intonational realization in the speech of Italian children. Enfance, 61.3: 317–327.Google Scholar
Di Cristo, A. (2011). Une approche intégrative des relations de l'accentuation au phrasé en français. Journal of French Language Studies, 21: 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duez, D. (1987). Hiérarchisation des paramètres acoustiques et identification des frontières. Actes des XVIièmes Journées d'Etude sur la Parole: 221–223.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. (1991). Rhythm and final lengthening in French. Journal of Phonetics, 19.2: 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
François, F., François, D., Sabeau-Jouannet, E. et Sourdot, M. (1977). La syntaxe de l'enfant avant 5 ans. Collection « Langue et Langage ». Paris: Larousse Université.Google Scholar
Herr-Israel, E. et McCune, L. (2011). Successive single-word utterances and use of conversational input: a pre-syntactic route to multiword utterances. Journal of Child Language, 38.1: 166–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Konopczynski, G. (1990). Le Langage Émergent I: Caractéristiques Rythmiques. Hambourg: Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
Konopczynski, G. (1991). Le Langage Émergent II: Aspects Vocaux et Mélodiques. Hambourg: BuskeVerlag.Google Scholar
Konopczynski, G. (2001). Maturation syntaxique chez le jeune enfant (9–36 mois). Continuité ou rupture? Revue Tranel (Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique), 34–35: 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacheret-Dujour, A. et Beaugendre, F (1999). La prosodie du français. Paris: Editions du CNRS.Google Scholar
Laufer, M. (1980). Temporal regularity in prespeech. Dans: Murry, T. and Murry, A. (dir.), Infant communication: cry and early speech. San Diego: College Hill Press.Google Scholar
Martin, P. (1981). Pour une théorie de l'intonation. L'intonation est-elle une structure congruente à la syntaxe? Dans: Rossi, M., Di Cristo, A., Hirst, D., Martin, P. et Nishinuma, Y. (dir.), L'intonation, de l'accent à la sémantique. Paris: Klincksiek, pp. 234–271.Google Scholar
Nespor, M. et Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Peters, A. M. (1997). Language typology, prosody and the acquisition of grammatical morphemes. Dans: D. Slobin (dir.), Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Robb, M. et Saxman, J. (1989). Syllable durations of preword and early word vocalizations. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33: 583–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgon, M. (1976). Single-word Usage, Cognitive Development and the Beginnings of Combinatorial Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rossi, M. (1999). L'intonation, le système du français: description et modélisation. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Scollon, R. (1979). A real early stage: an unzippered condensation of a dissertation on child language. Dans: Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. (dir.), Developmental Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, O. (1984). Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1966). Grammatical transformations and sentence comprehension in childhood and adulthood. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5: 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, D. (1994). Phrase-final syllable lengthening and intonation in early child speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37: 831–840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stokes, W. et Branigan, G. (1978). On the definition of two-word utterances: or when does 1 + 1 = 2? Paper delivered at the Third Annual Boston University Conference on Child Language Development.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge M.A.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vaissière, J. (1997). Langues, prosodie et syntaxe. Revue Traitement Automatique des Langues, ATALA, 38.1: 53–82.Google Scholar
Veneziano, E. (1999). Conversational properties and early language acquisition. Verbum, XXI (2): 191–205.Google Scholar
Veneziano, E., Sinclair, H. et Berthoud, I. (1990). From one word to two words: repetition patterns on the way to grammatical morphology. Journal of Child Language, 17: 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wijnen, F. (1990). The development of sentence planning. Journal of Child Language, 17: 651–675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed