Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T23:01:19.499Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reflections of the French nasal vowel shift in orthography on Twitter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2022

James Law Open the ORCID record for James Law [Opens in a new window]
James Law*
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University
*
Email: jimlaw@byu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Non-standard orthography on social media provides a useful supplementary data source for sociophonetic research. Regarding an ongoing chain shift in Northern Metropolitan French nasal vowels, spellings reflecting shifted vowel targets are observed on Twitter. These non-standard spellings, e.g. avont [avɔ̃] for avant /avɑ̃/ ‘before’, provide insight into speakers’ awareness of this change and its lexical distribution. Tweets with shifted and standard spellings of 306 word forms containing the phonemes /ɛ̃/, /œ̃/, /ɑ̃/ and /ɔ̃/ were collected from an 870-million word Internet Archive corpus of French tweets from 2011–2017. Shifted spellings were found for all four vowels and 168 words. The shifted spelling rate is lower than that of comparable variables in English and is not conditioned by stress, grammatical category, frequency, or phonological context, which affect the distribution of shifted nasal vowels in speech. However, frequent words show more indications of intentional misspelling, such as repetition and capitalization of the target vowel, suggesting that some speakers are conscious of the variation and comment on it using salient words. The results also contribute to an ongoing debate about a possible merger between /ɛ̃/ and /œ̃/, supporting the hypothesis of an incomplete merger where /ɛ̃/ shifts towards [ɑ̃] but /œ̃/ does not.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of French Language Studies , Volume 32 , Special Issue 2: Special Issue (French Variation in Digital Media) , July 2022 , pp. 197 - 215
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abitbol, J. L., Karsai, M., Magué, J.-P., Chevrot, J.-P., and Fleury, E. (2018). Socioeconomic Dependencies of Linguistic Patterns in Twitter: a Multivariate Analysis. In: WWW 2018: The 2018 Web Conference, April 23–27, 2018, Lyon, France. New York: ACM, pp. 1125–1134.Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, J. (2000). Non-standard spellings in media texts: The case of German fanzines. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4.4: 514–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archive Team. (2018). The Twitter Stream Grab. URL: www.archive.org/details/twitterstream, retrieved 1 June 2018.Google Scholar
Baeza-Yates, R., and Rello, L. (2012). On measuring the lexical quality of the web. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Joint WICOW/AIRWeb Workshop on Web Quality – WebQuality ’12. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beddor, P. S., Krakow, R. A., and Goldstein, L. M. (1986). Perceptual Constraints and Phonological Change: A Study of Nasal Vowel Height. In: C. Ewen and J. Anderson (eds), Phonology Yearbook, vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197–217.Google Scholar
Bordal, G. (2012). A phonological study of French spoken by multilingual speakers from Bangui, the capital of the Central African Republic. In: R. Gess, C. Lyche and T. Meisenburg (eds), Phonological Variation in French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutin, B. A., Gess, R. and Guèye, G. M. (2012). French in Senegal after three centuries: A phonological study of Wolof speakers’ French. In: R. Gess, C. Lyche and T. Meisenburg (eds), Phonological Variation in French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, S. and Diakopoulos, N. (2011). Cooooooooooooooollllllllllllll‼‼‼‼‼‼‼ Using Word Lengthening to Detect Sentiment in Microblogs. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Edinburgh: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 562–570.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M. (1996). Six-year-olds’ phonological and orthographic representations of vowels: A study of 1st grade Québec-French children. McGill University Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Carignan, C. (2014). An acoustic and articulatory examination of the “oral” in “nasal”: The oral articulations of French nasal vowels are not arbitrary. Journal of Phonetics, 46: 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coquillon, A. and Turcsan, G. (2012). An overview of the phonological and phonetic properties of Southern French: Data from two Marseille surveys. In: R. Gess, C. Lyche and T. Meisenburg (eds), Phonological Variation in French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 105–128.Google Scholar
Dredze, M., Paul, M. J., Bergsma, S., and Tran, H. (2013). Carmen: A twitter geolocation system with applications to public health. In: Expanding the Boundaries of Health Informatics Using Artificial Intelligence: Papers from the AAAI 2013 Workshop. Palo Alto, California: AAAI Press, pp. 20–24.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, J. (2013). Phonological factors in social media writing. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Language Analysis in Social Media – 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, NAACL-HLT 2013. Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 11–19.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, J. (2015). Systematic patterning in phonologically-motivated orthographic variation. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 19.2: 161–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstein, J. (2018). Identifying Regional Dialects in On-Line Social Media. In: Boberg, C., Nerbonne, J. and Watt, D. (eds), The Handbook of Dialectology. Oxford: Wiley, pp. 368–383.Google Scholar
Fónagy, I. (1989). Le français change de visage? Revue romane, 24.2: 225–253.Google Scholar
Hambye, P. and Simon, A. C. (2012). The variation of pronunciation in Belgian French: From segmental phonology to prosody. In: Gess, R., Lyche, C. and Meisenburg, T. (eds), Phonological Variation in French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 129–150.Google Scholar
Hansen, A. B. (2001a). Les changements actuels des voyelles nasales du français parisien : confusions ou changement en chaine ? La linguistique, 37.2: 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, A. B. (2001b). Lexical diffusion as a factor of phonetic change: The case of Modern French nasal vowels. Language Variation and Change, 13.2: 209–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, A. B. (2012). A study of young Parisian speech: Some trends in pronunciation. In: Gess, R., Lyche, C. and Meisenburg, T. (eds), Phonological Variation in French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 151–172.Google Scholar
He, T. and Wang, W. (2009). Invented spelling of EFL young beginning writers and its relation with phonological awareness and grapheme-phoneme principles. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18.1: 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honeybone, P. and Watson, K. (2013). Salience and the sociolinguistics of Scouse spelling: Exploring the phonology of the Contemporary Humorous Localised Dialect Literature of Liverpool. English World-Wide, 34.3: 305–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A. (2000). Introduction : Non-standard orthography and non-standard speech. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4.4: 497–513.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. and Walton, S. (2000). The voices people read: Orthography and the representation of non-standard speech. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4.4: 561–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, T. (2006). Recording and environmental effects in sociolinguistic interviews: Implications for sociophonetic analysis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119.5: 3337–3337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Linell, P. (2005). The written language bias in linguistics : its nature, origins and transformations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lonchamp, F. (1978). Recherches sur les indices perceptifs des voyelles orales et nasales: Application à la structure du système vocalique français et de diverses autres langues. University of Nancy Master thesis.Google Scholar
Magué, J.-P., Rossi-Gensane, N. and Halté, P. (2020). De la segmentation dans les tweets : signes de ponctuation, connecteurs, émoticônes et émojis. Corpus, 20.Google Scholar
Malécot, A. and Lindsay, P. (1976). The Neutralization of /ɛ̃/-/œ̃/ in French. Phonetica, 33.1: 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCulloch, G. (2019). Because Internet: Understanding the new rules of language. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
Mettas, O. (1973). Les réalisations vocaliques d’un sociolecte parisien. Travaux de l’Institut de Phonétique de Strasbourg, 5: 1–11.Google Scholar
Mooney, D. (2016). Transmission and diffusion: Linguistic change in the regional French of Béarn. Journal of French Language Studies, 26.3: 327–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Néron, M. (2017). French Nasals: An Objective View. Journal of Singing, 73.4: 413–420.Google Scholar
New, B., Brysbaert, M., Veronis, J., and Pallier, C. (2007). The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28.4: 661–677. URL: http://www.lexique.org, retrieved 25 July 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passy, P. É. (1891). Étude sur les changements phonétiques et leurs caractères généraux. Paris: Firmin-Didot.Google Scholar
Perez, S. (2017). Twitter officially expands its character count to 280 starting today. TechCrunch. URL: https://techcrunch.com/2017/11/07/twitter-officially-expands-its-character-count-to-280-starting-today/, retrieved 14 August 2018.Google Scholar
Pooley, T. (2006). On the geographical spread of Oïl French in France. Journal of French Language Studies, 16.3: 357–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, D. R. (2000). Mowr and mowr bayud spellin’: Confessions of a sociolinguist. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4.4: 615–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. (2018). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL: https://www.R-project.org/, retrieved 18 August 2018.Google Scholar
Racine, I. and Andreassen, H. N. (2012). A phonological study of a Swiss French variety: Data from the canton of Neuchâtel. In Gess, R., Lyche, C. and Meisenburg, T. (eds), Phonological Variation in French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 173–210.Google Scholar
Rochet, B. L. (1976). The Formation and the Evolution of the French Nasal Vowels. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, R. (1999). Nasal vowel evolution in Romance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sebba, M. (2003). Spelling rebellion. In Androutsopoulos, J. K. and Georgakopoulou, A. (eds), Discourse Constructions of Youth Identities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 151–172.Google Scholar
Straka, G. (1979). Remarques sur les voyelles nasales, leur origine et leur évolution en français. In: Les sons et les mots: Choix d’études de phonétique et de linguistique. Paris: Klincksieck, pp. 501–531.Google Scholar
Tatman, R. (2015). # go awn: Sociophonetic Variation in Variant Spellings on Twitter. Working Papers of the Linguistics Circle, 25.2: 97–108.Google Scholar
Tatman, R. (2016). “I’m a spawts guay”: Comparing the use of sociophonetic variables in speech and Twitter. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 22.2: 160–170.Google Scholar
Walter, H. (1994). Variétés actuelles des voyelles nasales du français. Communication and Cognition, 27.1–2: 223–236.Google Scholar
Wengelin, Å. (2002). Text production in adults with reading and writing difficulties. Göteborg University Doctoral dissertation Google Scholar