Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:02:27.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Germanic locative adverbs in *-on-

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Kenneth Shields
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper it is proposed that Germanic locative adverbs in *-on- bear an etymological relationship to Hittite ablatives in -anza and therefore yield additional evidence for the archaic nature of the Germanic dialect group.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , January 1995 , pp. 51 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Adrados, Francisco. 1992. “The new image of Indoeuropean.” Indogermanische Forschungen 97: 1–28.Google Scholar
Braune, Wilhelm and Ebbinghaus, E. A.. 1973. Gotische Grammatik. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl. 1911. Grundriß der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Vol. 2.2. Straßburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
Buck, Carl D. 1933. Comparative grammar of Greek and Latin. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burrow, T. 1973. The Sanskrit language. Rev. ed. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Fairbanks, Gordon. 1977. “Case inflections in Indo-European.” Journal of Indo-European studies 5: 5–101.Google Scholar
Gray, Louis. 1932. “On Indo-European noun declension: Especially of -o- and -ā- stems.” Language 8: 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirt, Hermann. 1932. Handbuch des Urgermanischen. Vol. 2. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Houwink ten Cate, Philo. 1967.“The ending -d of the Hittite possessive pronoun.” Revue hittite et asianique 24: 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasanoff, Jay. 1973. “The Hittite ablative in -anz(a)” Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 31: 123–128.Google Scholar
Kronasser, Heinz. 1956. Vergleichende Laut-und Formenlehre des Hethitischen. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred. 1958. “On earlier stages of the Indo-European nominal inflection.” Language 3: 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred. 1982. “From phonetic facts to syntactic paradigms: The noun in Early PIE.” In The Indo-Europeans in the fourth and third millennia. Ed. Lehmann, W.. Ann Arbor: Karoma. Pp. 140–155.Google Scholar
Leumann, Manu. 1963. Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre. München: Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Markey, T. L. 1979. “Deixis and the u−perfect.” Journal of Indo-European studies 7: 65–75.Google Scholar
Mažiulis, V. 1970. Baltų ir kitų indoeuropiečių kalbu santykiai. Vilnis: Mintis.Google Scholar
Neu, Erich. 1979. “Einige Überlegungen zu den hethitischen Kasusendungen.” In Hethitisch und Indogermanisch. Eds. Neu, E. & Meid, W.. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Univ. Innsbruck. Pp. 177–196.Google Scholar
Polomé, Edgar. 1972. “Germanic and the other Indo-European languages.” In Toward a grammar of Proto-Germanic. Eds. van Coetsem, F. & Kufner, H.. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. Pp. 43–69.Google Scholar
Polomé, Edgar. 1982. “Germanic as an archaic Indo-European language.” In Festschrift für Karl Schneider. Ed. Jankowsky, K. & Dick, E.. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Pp. 51–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmalstieg, William. 1973. “New thoughts on Indo-European phonology.” Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 87: 99–157.Google Scholar
Schmalstieg, William. 1974. “Some morphological implications of the Indo-European passage of *-oN to *-ō.” Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 88: 187–198.Google Scholar
Schmalstieg, William. 1980. Indo-European linguistics: A new synthesis. University Park: Penn State Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Schmid, Wolfgang. 1973. “Sprachwissenschaftliche Bemerkungen zum hethitischen ‘Direktiv’.” In Festschrift Heinrich Otten. Eds. Neu, E. and Rüster, C.. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. Pp. 291–301.Google Scholar
Schwyzer, Eduard. 1939. Griechische Grammatik. Vol. 1. München: Bech.Google Scholar
Shields, Kenneth. 1982a. Indo-European noun inflection: A developmental history. University Park: Penn State Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Shields, Kenneth. 1982b. “The Indo-European origins of the Old Hittite directive case.” Journal of Indo-European studies 9: 273–282.Google Scholar
Shields, Kenneth. 1982c. “The origin of the Tocharian locative suffixes.” Journal of the American Oriental society 102: 129–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, Kenneth. 1985. “Go. meina and related Germanic forms.” Michigan Germanic studies 11: 62–70.Google Scholar
Shields, Kenneth. 1987. “On the Indo-European ablative.” Emerita 55: 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, Kenneth. 1991a. “Comments about the o−stem genitive of Indo-European.” Historische Sprachforschung 104: 52–62.Google Scholar
Shields, Kenneth. 1991b. “Speculations about the Early Indo-European genitive-ablative and dative-locative.” Linguistique balkanique 34, 1–2: 21–27.Google Scholar
Shields, Kenneth. 1992. A history of Indo-European verb morphology. Amsterdam Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, Kenneth. 1993. “The origin of the Armenian locative plural.” Journal of Indo-European studies 21: 55–62.Google Scholar
Shields, Kenneth. Forthcoming. “The Indo-European genitive marker *-r: Evidence from Germanic and other dialects.” Nowele.Google Scholar
Specht, Franz. 1947. Der Ursprung der indogermanischen Deklination. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald. 1970. Einführung in die vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Voyles, Joseph. 1993. Early Germanic grammar. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar