Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T03:25:36.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pot-Holes and Glacier Mills

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2017

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Such pot-holes as are caused by glacial action are in the main not due to cascades of melt water falling direct to the glacier bed, but are formed by the subglacial stream when conditions are favourable.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Gletschertöpfe (Strudellöcher) unter einem Gletscher entstehen wohl selten durch direkten Sturz des Schmelzwassers von der Gletscheroberfläche zum Felsuntergrund, sondern in den meisten Fällen durch die wirbelnde Aktion des subgIazialen Baches beim Zusammentreffen günstiger Umstände.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1951

The round holes on the rocky banks of torrents with a spherical stone at the bottom are well known. These “pot-holes” are sometimes associated with glacial action and are then often referred to loosely as “glacier mills,” or more properly “glacier mill cavities.”Footnote * The generally accepted explanation of such of these holes as are due to glacial action is that a melt water stream on the glacier surface plunges down through the glacief (as will presently be discussed), hits a large stone on the glacier bed and sets it in rotation, thus excavating a hollow in the rock. This explanation sounds obvious, but the writer cannot fully agree with it.

Not all holes of this nature have any connection with glacial action, as was pointed out by Albert Heim.Footnote But even those which were formed beneath glaciers cannot, in the author’s opinion, have come about in this way, except perhaps very exceptionally.

Few if any observers can have seen the whole process in operation from the time the melt water stream disappeared from the glacier surface, cascaded to the rock bed below and was there scouring out a hollow. As a rule only one or other of these operations can be witnessed.

As we descend a glacier and reach the firn line we find, if the day is hot, that the melted snow and ice gathers into small streams which unite to form larger ones. The water, heated by insolation, melts deep channels in the ice. If the stream reaches a steeper slope where crevasses appear it will naturally flow into one of these (see Fig. 1, p. 489) and by devious paths, or under favourable conditions in one leap, reach the glacier bed.

Fig. 1

It is well known that crevasses always open at approximately the same place in a glacier when it flows over a convex step in its bed. They gape wide open, and close up again as the slope flattens out (see Fig. 2, p. 489). When a melt water stream (W, Fig. 2) enters a crevasse it melts a more or less cylindrical shaft on the up-hill side of the crevasse wall (II, Fig. 2). This maintains its shape even after the crevasse has closed up in its course from II to V. At VI the crevasse has become a barely visible scar but the shaft still remains. These shafts are generally known as moulins or “glacier mills.” In German the more appropriate term of “shaft” (Schacht) is often used.

Fig. 2

The shaft, now dry since the water has been trapped by a new crevasse, moves on with the ice. Incidentally, these holes with their blue-green irridescent ice walls, following one another at regular intervals, form a striking feature of the glacier scene.

In rare cases these shafts may descend in one leap to the glacier bed, there excavating a true pot-hole in the ordinarily accepted meaning of the term. This is shown diagrammatically in Fig. 3 (p. 489) in which the glacier depth has been very considerably reduced. It must be remembered that the ice is probably several hundred feet deep and that crevasses never reach the glacier bed except sometimes at the snout. It is therefore unlikely that the stream could strike a stone tangentially in an unbroken fall from top to bottom causing it to revolve. But even if it did its changing position would not permit it to play long enough on a given stone to make an appreciable hollow.

Fig. 3

To the author, then, it seems much more likely that those pot-holes which are due to glacial action were formed by the subglacial stream itself. This runs at high velocity in its confined channel, strikes against a hard bottom moraine in a hollow and sets units of this in rotation. This process is exemplified by the smaller stone in Fig. 3.

In the famous Gletschergarten of Lucerne, now open to all through the generosity of the Amrein family, one can see a pot-hole on the summit of a roche moutonnée. This has been taken as proof that the hole originated, not in the subglacial stream, but by cascade action through a shaft. In the author’s opinion it merely shows that it is older than the roche moutonnée and was formed while the subglacial stream was still running at the level of the summit of the roche moutonnée. The excavation of the latter at a later date can be conceived as having taken place by the mechanism suggested by the authorFootnote * and by CarolFootnote

It is striking that glacier mills, as do roches moutonnées and drumlins, appear in numbers preponderantly behind, and on, steps and buttresses where the glacier once spread out over more Ievel ground. Pot-holes due to glacial action are to be found at various places all over the Alps. Recently particularly beautiful ones in crystalline rocks have been unearthed in the Maloja Pass in the Upper Engadin. Very likely they are distributed all over the world, not only in mountainous districts but also on more level ground which was covered by glaciers in the glacial period. At the decline of the glaciers they became covered by morainic material and lost to sight. It remains to be seen whether they will stay hidden or whether they will come to light and then be recognised as glacial formations.

References

* See for instance Tutton. The High Alps. London, 1931, p.125.

Gletscherkunde. Stuttgart, 1885, p. 544.

* Vierteljrchr. Natf. Get. in Zürich, Bd. 86, 1941, p. 125

Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1947, p. 57.

Figure 0

Fig. 1

Figure 1

Fig. 2

Figure 2

Fig. 3