Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-02T13:08:12.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Groups of Campanian Red-Figure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

J. D. Beazley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The material I have had before me in this essay is comparatively scanty. Like many other students, I have not paid very much attention to Campanian in the past; and I am now dependent on published reproductions, a few photographs, a few originals, and not many notes of all the originals no longer accessible. Most of the reproductions published hitherto are poor or incomplete. The great majority of the vases come from irregular excavation, with no record of the circumstances in which they were found; and even where the search has been properly conducted, the published reports, with a few exceptions, are not fully illustrated. All this to explain gaps, errors, hesitations: not to crave indulgence.

We begin with what may be called the Owl-Pillar Group, from the subject of two well-known vases. A list was given in Vases in Poland, p. 77, and the style characterised. The present list is more detailed, and includes additions. Most of the Berlin examples had already been put together by Furtwängler in his catalogue.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Hellenic Studies , Volume 63 , November 1943 , pp. 66 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 1943

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Furtwängler, , Beschreibung der Vasensammlung im Antiquarium (1885) 833–64 and 1036–9.Google Scholar
Patroni, , La ceramica antica nell' Italia meridionale (1897).Google Scholar
Weege, , Oskische Grabmalerei and Bewaffnung und Tracht der Osker in Jh. 24 (1909) 99–162.Google Scholar
Gàbrici, , Necropoli di età ellenistica a Teano dei Sidicini in M.L. 20 (1910), 6–151.Google Scholar
Gàbrici, , Cumae ( = M[onumenti] … L[incei] 22) (1913).Google Scholar
Lang, , Zur oskischen Frauentracht in Jh. 18 (1915), beibl., 233–52.Google Scholar
Gàbrici, , Vaso campano a pittura policroma in Mon. Piot 24 (1920), 183–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giglioli, , Ponticelli (Napoli). Necropoli del III secolo av. Cr. in località ‘Purgatorio’ in NSc. 1922, 257–86.Google Scholar
Tillyard, , The Hope Vases (1923) 18–20 and 146–68.Google Scholar
Walters, , Corpus Vasorum Antiquorum, British Museum, v (1930).Google Scholar
Patroni, , in Enciclopedia Italiana s.v. Campani, Vasi (1930).Google Scholar
Elia, , Caivano. Necropoli pre-romana in N.Sc. 1931, 577–614.Google Scholar
Pace, , Ceramiche figurate di fabbrica siceliota in Atti della R. Accademia di Napoli 12 (1931), 317 ff.Google Scholar
Mingazzini, , Corpus Vasorum Antiquorum, Museo Campano, i (1935).Google Scholar
Pesce, , Napoli. Le necropoli di Castelcapuano e di Via Cirillo in N.Sc. 1935, 257–93.Google Scholar
Maiuri, , Maddaloni. Tombe preromane nell' agro di Calatia in N.Sc. 1936, 51–9.Google Scholar
Giglioli, , Caserta. Tombe osche in N.Sc. 1936, 353–9.Google Scholar
Trendall, , Paestan Pottery (1936) passim.Google Scholar
Elia, , Necropoli dell' agro Campano e Atellano in N.Sc. 1937, 101–43.Google Scholar
Pace, , Arte e civiltà della Sicilia antica ii (1938), 464–78.Google Scholar