Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:14:47.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Hedgehog and the Fox: Form and Meaning in the Prologue of Herodotus*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2012

Marek Węcowski
Marek Węcowski
Affiliation:
Warsaw University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper focuses on Herodotus' authorial self-representation, and on the problem of the intellectual tradition and genre(s) behind the Histories. The main assumption is that the opening sections of the work are a natural place to present its subject and principles to the public. Despite and beyond the notoriously loose grammatical structure of the first sentence, this paper offers a formal analysis of the whole ‘extended preface’ (incipit through 1.5.4), a carefully organized large-scale ‘pedimental composition’. A detailed examination of this structure yields the following results: (1) the stories about the abductions of women form an ironic attack against a peculiar model of causality of some contemporary Greek poets and writers, whose pragmatic outlook deprives the world of its ethico-religious dimension. (2) Conversely, Herodotus himself propounds a symbolic view of the world and seeks a monistic principle encompassing the past and the whole range of human experience. He ultimately finds it in the idea of the ‘cycle of human affairs’. This idea is the carefully stated subject of the Histories. (3) Although he belongs to the agonistic and display-oriented intellectual world of the sophistic era, Herodotus poses as a ‘sage’ capable of penetrating the whole variety of ‘all things’. Thus, he refers his reader to the tradition of wisdom literature. (4) Not unlike Thucydides, Herodotus' research into the greatest military conflict thus far forms in his view the best possible paradigmatic diagnosis of the human condition – much better than that of his fellow wise men (poets, philosophers, etc.) because based on the firm ground of verifiable historical data. (5) Although Herodotus is intent upon seeing the world from the standpoint of a single organizing principle, one of the most salient features of the Histories is the notion of the ‘marvellous’ (thômaston), which clearly elicits the pragmatic or factual attitude of the thinkers he dislikes. Many problems we experience when interpreting this author are due to the tension between the two attitudes. (6) This inherent breach in Herodotus' mind should be seen as a result not of a development or evolution of his work and thought, but of the contemporary debate between two diametrically opposed types of knowledge, viz. between the exponents of polymathiê, or Vielwisserei, and those of sophiê, or ‘wisdom’. Herodotus' contemporaries active in the field of arkhaiologia (including mythography, genealogy, etc.) and periêgêsis (geography, ethnography, etc.) were widely considered ‘polymaths’. Herodotus' ambition to apply the monistic (and symbolic) bent of wisdom literature to the subject-matter dominated thus far by the ‘pluralistic’ (and pragmatic) way of thinking was at least partly responsible for this discontinuity in his thought, but also accounts for the originality of the Histories.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Hellenic Studies , Volume 124 , November 2004 , pp. 143 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Asheri, D. (1991) Erodoto. Le Storie 1, ed. Asheri, D. and Antelami, V. (3rd edn, Milan)Google Scholar
Bakker, E.J. (2002) ‘The making of history: Herodotus' historiēs apodexis’, in Bakker et al. (eds) (2002) 3–32Google Scholar
Bakker, E.J., de Jong, I.J.F. and Van Wees, H. (eds) (2002) Brill's Companion to Herodotus (Leiden, Boston and Cologne)Google Scholar
Berlin, I. (1966) The Hedgehog and the Fox. An Essay on Tolstoy's View of History (2nd edn, New York)Google Scholar
Bertelli, L. (2001) ‘Hecataeus: from genealogy to historiography’, in Luraghi (ed.) (2001) 67–94Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. (2000) ‘Herodotus's genre(s)’, in Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds), Matrices of Genre. Authors, Canons, and Society (Cambridge, MA and London) 97–114Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. and Peradotto, J. (eds) (1987) Herodotus and the Invention of History (Arethusa 20.1–2)Google Scholar
Bornitz, H.-F. (1968) Herodot-Studien. Beiträge zur Verständnis der Einheit des Geschichtswerks (Berlin)Google Scholar
Bowie, A.M. (1993) ‘Homer, Herodotus and the ‘beginnings' of Thucydides' History’, in Jocelyn, H.D. and Hurt, H. (eds), Tria Lustra. Essays and Notes Presented to John Pinsent … (Liverpool) 141–7Google Scholar
Bravo, B. (2000) ‘Pseudo-Herodotus and Pseudo-Thucydides on Scythia, Thrace and the regions “beyond”’, ASNP 5.1/4, 21–112Google Scholar
Bravo, B. (2001) ‘Un frammento della Piccola Iliade (P. Oxy. 2510), lo stile narrativo tardo-arcaico, i racconti su Achille immortale’, QUCC 61, 49–114Google Scholar
Cartledge, P. (2001) Spartan Reflexions (London)Google Scholar
Cobet, J. (1971) Herodots Exkurse und die Frage der Einheit seines Werkes (Historia Einzelschrift 17, Wiesbaden)Google Scholar
Cobet, J. (2002) ‘The organization of time in the Histories’, in Bakker et al. (eds) (2002) 387–412Google Scholar
Corcella, A. (1984) Erodoto e l'analogia (Palermo)Google Scholar
Darbo-Peschanski, C. (1987) Le discours du particulier. Essai sur l'enquête hérodotéenne (Paris)Google Scholar
Dewald, C. (1999) ‘The figured stage: focalizing the initial narratives of Herodotus and Thucydides’, in Falkner, T.M., Felson, N., Konstan, D. (eds), Contextualizing Classics. Essays in Honor of John J. Peradotto (Lanham) 221–52Google Scholar
Dorati, M. (2000) Le Storie di Erodoto: Etnografia e racconto (Pisa and Rome)Google Scholar
Drews, R. (1973) The Greek Accounts of Eastern History (Washington, DC and Cambridge, MA)Google Scholar
Drexler, H. (1972) Herodot-Studien (Hildesheim and New York)Google Scholar
Erbse, H. (1956) ‘Der erste Satz im Werke Herodots’, in Festschrift Bruno Snell … (Munich) 209–22Google Scholar
Erbse, H. (1992) Studien zum Verständnis Herodots (Berlin and New York)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehling, D. (1975) ‘Zur Funktion und Formengeschichte des Proömiums in der älteren griechischen Prosa’, in ΔΩΡΗΜΑ. Hans Diller zum 70. Geburtstag … (Athens) 61–75Google Scholar
Fehling, D. (1989) Herodotus and his ‘Sources’. Citation, Invention and Narrative Art (trans. Howie, J.G.) (Leeds)Google Scholar
Fornara, C.W. (1971) Herodotus. An Interpretative Essay (Oxford)Google Scholar
Fowler, R.L. (1996) ‘Herodotos and his contemporaries’, JHS 116, 62–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, R.L. (2001) ‘Early Historiē and literacy’, in Luraghi (ed.) (2001) 95–115Google Scholar
Fowler, R.L. (2003), ‘Herodotos and Athens’, in Derow, P. and Parker, R. (eds), Herodotus and his World. Essays from a Conference in Memory of George Forrest (Oxford) 305–18Google Scholar
Fritz, K. von (1967) Die griechische Geschichtsschreibung 1.1–2: Von den Anfängen bis Thukydides (Berlin)Google Scholar
Gladigow, B. (1965) Sophia und Kosmos. Untersuchungen zur Frühgeschichte von σοφός und σοφίή (Hildesheim)Google Scholar
Guthrie, W.K.C. (1962–1969) A History of Greek Philosophy (6 vols, Cambridge)Google Scholar
Harrison, T. (2000) Divinity and History. The Religion of Herodotus (Oxford)Google Scholar
Hartog, F. (1991) Le miroir d'Hérodote. Essai sur la représentation de l'autre (2nd edn, Paris)Google Scholar
Hommel, H. (1981) ‘Herodots Einleitungssatz: ein Schlüssel zur Analyse des Gesamtwerks?’, in Kurz et al. (eds) (1981) 271–87Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. (1996) A Commentary on Thucydides 2: Books IV–V.24 (Oxford)Google Scholar
Howald, E. (1944) Vom Geist antiker Geschichtsschreibung (Munich and Berlin)Google Scholar
Huber, L. (1965) ‘Herodots Homerverständnis’, in Flashar, H. and Gaiser, K. (eds), Synusia. Festgabe für Wolfgang Schadewaldt (Pfullingen) 29–52Google Scholar
Hunter, V. (1982) Past and Process in Herodotus and Thucydides (Princeton)Google Scholar
Immerwahr, H.R. (1966) Form and Thought in Herodotus (Cleveland, OH)Google Scholar
Jacoby, F. (1912) ‘Hekataios’, RE 7.2 666–769Google Scholar
Jacoby, F. (1913) ‘Herodotos’, RE Suppl. 2. 205–520Google Scholar
Jacoby, F. (1949) Atthis. The Local Chronicles of Ancient Athens (Oxford)Google Scholar
Krischer, T. (1965) ‘Herodots Prooimion’, Hermes 93, 159–67Google Scholar
Kurz, G., Müller, D. and Nicolai, W. (eds) (1981) Gnomosyne … Festschrift für Walter Marg zum 70. Geburtstag (Munich)Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. (1986) ‘The empirical element in the methods of early Greek medical writers and Herodotus: a shared epistemological response’, Antichthon 20, 1–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lateiner, D. (1989) The Historical Method of Herodotus (Toronto)Google Scholar
Lewis, D.M. (1985) ‘Persians in Herodotus’, in The Greek Historians: Literature and History. Papers Presented to A.E. Raubitschek (Saratoga, CA) 101–17Google Scholar
Lloyd, G.E.R. (1987) The Revolutions of Wisdom. Studies in Claims and Practice of Ancient Greek Science (Berkeley)Google Scholar
Luraghi, N. (2001), ‘Local knowledge in Herodotus' Histories’, in Luraghi (ed.) (2001) 138–60Google Scholar
Luraghi, N. (ed.) (2001) The Historian's Craft in the Age of Herodotus (Oxford)Google Scholar
Marg, W. (ed.) (1962) Herodot. Eine Auswahl aus der neueren Forschung (Darmstadt)Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (1997) Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography (Cambridge)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millender, E. (1999) ‘Athenian ideology and the empowered Spartan woman’, in Hodkinson, S. and Powell, A. (eds), Sparta. New Perspectives (London) 355–91Google Scholar
Moles, J.L. (1993) ‘Truth and untruth in Herodotus and Thucydides’, in Gill, C. and Wiseman, T.P. (eds), Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World (Exeter) 88–121Google Scholar
Moles, J.L. (1996) ‘Herodotus warns the Athenians’, in Cairns, F. and Heath, M. (eds), Roman Poetry and Prose, Greek Poetry, Etymology, Historiography (Leeds) 259–84Google Scholar
Moles, J.L. (2002) ‘Herodotus and Athens’, in Bakker et al. (eds) (2002) 33–52Google Scholar
Müller, D. (1981) ‘Herodot – Vater des Empirismus? Mensch und Erkenntnis im Denken Herodots’, in Kurz et al. (eds) (1981) 299–318Google Scholar
Munson, R.V. (2001) Telling Wonders. Ethnographic and Political Discourse in the Work of Herodotus (Ann Arbor)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, O. (2001) ‘Herodotus and oral history’, in Luraghi (ed.) (2001) 16–44Google Scholar
Myres, J.L. (1953) Herodotus. Father of History (Oxford)Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1987) ‘Herodotus the logios’, in Boedeker and Peradotto (eds) (1987) 175–84Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1990) Pindar's Homer. The Lyric Possession of an Epic Past (Baltimore and London)Google Scholar
Nestle, W. (1940) Vom Mythos zum Logos (Stuttgart)Google Scholar
Pagel, K.-A. (1927) Die Bedeutung des aitiologischen Momentes für Herodots Geschichtsschreibung (Borna and Leipzig)Google Scholar
Pelliccia, H. (1992) ‘Sappho 16, Gorgias' Helen, and the preface to Herodotus' Histories’, YCS 29, 63–84Google Scholar
Pelling, C.B.R. (1991) ‘Thucydides' Archidamus and Herodotus' Artabanus’, in Flower, M.A. and Toher, M. (eds), Georgica. Greek Studies in Honour of George Cawkwell (London) 120–42Google Scholar
Pelling, C.B.R. (2000) Literary Texts and the Greek Historian (London and New York)Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1937) Herodot. Der erste Geschichtschreiber des Abendlandes (Leipzig and Berlin)Google Scholar
Porciani, L. (1997) La forma proemiale. Storiografia e pubblico nel mondo antico (Pisa)Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K.A. (1987) ‘Herodotus, political thought, and the meaning of history’, in Boedeker and Peradotto (eds) (1987) 221–48Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K.A. (2002) ‘Philosophy, science, politics: Herodotus and the intellectual trends of his time’, in Bakker et al. (eds) (2002) 149–86Google Scholar
Rösler, W. (2002) ‘The Histories and Writing’, in Bakker et al. (eds) (2002) 79–94Google Scholar
Romilly, J. de (1975) ‘Cycles et cercles chez les auteurs grecs de l'époque classique’, in Bingen, J., Cambier, G. and Nachtergael, G. (eds), Le monde grec … Hommages à Claire Préaux (Brussels) 140–52Google Scholar
Schadewaldt, W. (1962) ‘Das Religiös-humane als Grundlage der geschichtlichen Obiektivität bei Herodot’, in Marg (ed.) (1962) 185–201Google Scholar
Shrimpton, G.S. (1997) History and Memory in Ancient Greece (Montreal and Kingston)Google Scholar
Snell, B. (1924) Die Ausdrücke für den Begriff des Wissens in der vorplatonischen Philosophie (σοφία, γνώμη, σύνεσις, ἱστορία, μάθημα, ἐπιστήμη) (Berlin)Google Scholar
Strasburger, H. (1972) Homer und die Geschichtsschreibung (Heidelberg)Google Scholar
Thomas, R. (2000) Herodotus in Context. Ethnography, Science and the Art of Persuasion (Cambridge)Google Scholar
Thomas, R. (2001) ‘Herodotus' Histories and the floating gap’, in Luraghi (ed.) (2001) 198–210.Google Scholar
Vannicelli, P. (2001) ‘Herodotus' Egypt and the foundation of universal history’, in Luraghi (ed.) (2001) 211–40Google Scholar
Van Wees, H. (2002) ‘Herodotus and the past’, in Bakker et al. (eds) (2002) 321–49Google Scholar
West, S.R. (2002) Demythologisation in Herodotus (Xenia Toruniensia 6, Toruń)Google Scholar