Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:35:54.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Anatomy of Eubothrium crassum (Bloch) from the Pyloric Caeca and Small Intestine of Salmo trutta L.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

Dilys Rawson
Dilys Rawson
Affiliation:
Queen Elizabeth College, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Eubothrium crassum (Bloch) is re-described with additional information about the scolex and genitalia.

2. Specific differences between E. crassum and E. salvelini are commented upon and figured.

3. The second portion of the uterine duct lying between the central chamber of Mehlis's gland and the uterine sac is established as the “fertilization chamber”.

4. Polar bodies and maturation divisions are described and figured in definite relationships with the ovum as evidence of normal maturation in a cestode.

5. The position of the receptaculum seminis is determined and a new name, the “vagina sac”, is given to what was previously described as a receptaculum seminis. It is thought to serve for propulsion of male and female cells into the uterine duct.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , September 1957 , pp. 103 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chen, Pin-Dji., 1937.—“Germ cell cycle in Paragonimus Kellicotti Ward.” Trans. Amer. micr. Soc., 56, 208–236. (W.L. 21400)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, L. H., 1951.—“The Invertebrates, Vol. II. Platyhelminthes and Rhynchocoela.” McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Jenni, W., 1945.—“Zur Kenntnis der Fischparasiten des Zurichsees.” Vjschr. naturf. Ges. Zurich, 90, 271–275. (W.L. 22557)Google Scholar
Loennberg, E., 1889.—“Bidrag till Kannedomen om i Sverige forekommande Cestoder.” Bih. Svensk. VetenskAkad. Handl., Afd. 4, 14, 1–69. (W.L. 2948.)Google Scholar
Lühe, M., 1899–1900.—“Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Bothriocephaliden.” Zbl. Bakt., 26, 27, 97. (W.L. 23684.)Google Scholar
Matz, Fr., 1892.—“Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Bothriocephalen.” Arch. Naturgesch., 58J, 1, 97–122. (W.L. 1782.)Google Scholar
Motomura, I., 1929.—“Early development of the monozoic cestode, Archigetes appendiculatus, including oogenesis and fertilisation.” Annot. Zool. Jap., 12, 109–129. (W.L. 1072)Google Scholar
Nybelin, O., 1922.—“Anatomisch-systematische studien über Pseudophyllideen.” Göreborgs Vetensk. Samh. Handl., (4), 26, 1–228. (W.L. 9266)Google Scholar
Nybelin, O., 1942.—“Zur Helminthen-fauna der Süsswasserfische Schwedens. ii. Die Cestoden des Welses.” Göreborgs Vetensk. Samh. Handl., (6B), 1, 3–24.Google Scholar
Rawson, D., 1952.—“Spermatogenesis in Lumbricus terrestris. L. and Fasciola hepatica.” Nature, Lond., 171, 264. (W.L. 14900)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawson, D., 1952.—“The occurrence of parasitic worms in British freshwater fishes.” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 12, 5, 877. (W.L. 1050)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawson, D., 1955.—“Maturation divisions of the ova in the Pseudophyllidean Cestode Eubothrium crassum (Bloch).” Nature, Lond., 176, 167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rees, G., 1939.—“Studies on the germ cell cycle of the digenetic trematode Parorchis acanthus Nicoll. Part I. Anatomy of the genitalia and gametogenesis in the adult.” Parasitology, 31, 417–433. (W.L. 16035).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisinger, E., 1925.—“Untersuchungen am Nervensystem der Bothrioplana semperi Braun. (Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Technik der Vitalen Nervenfärbung und zur vergletchenden anatomie des Plathelminthennerven systems).” Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere, 5, 119–149. (W.L. 23512a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatjinsland, H., 1885,—“Die embryonale Entwicklung der Bothriocephalen.” Jena. Z. Naturw., 19, 520–572. (W.L. 10899)Google Scholar
Stephenson, W., 1947.—“Physiological and histochemical observations on the adult liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica L. III. Egg shell formation.” Parasitology, 38, 128–139. (W.L. 16035)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willmott, S., 1950.—“Gametogenesis and early development in Gigantocotyle bathycotyle (Fischoeder, 1901), Nasmark, 1937.” J. Helminth., 24, 1–14. (W.L. 11224c)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, R. T., 1923.—“Gametogenesis in cestodes.” Arch. Zellforsch., 17, 419–437. (W.L.1820)Google Scholar
Zernecke, E., 1895.—“Untersuchungen über den feineren Bau der Cestoden.” Zool. Jb., Abt. Anat., 9, 92–161. (W.L. 23831)Google Scholar