Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:37:13.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Incidence of Trematodes of the Family Heterophyidae from Dogs and Cats in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

B. Venkateswara Rao  and
M. Anantaraman
B. Venkateswara Rao
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Madras Veterinary College, Madras, India
M. Anantaraman
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Madras Veterinary College, Madras, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Haplorchis taichui H. yokogawai and Stictodora manilensis are recorded for the first time in India from dogs.

2. H. helerophyes from Indian cats are very much smaller than those recorded from dogs.

3. A technique has been described to study the chitinous armature of the gonotyl in heterophyid trematodes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 41 , Issue 2-3 , June 1967 , pp. 211 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, S. K., 1933.—“Incidence of Helminth parasites in pariah dogs.” Indian vet. J., 9, 210.Google Scholar
Acharya, S. K., 1939.—“Incidence of helminth parasites in indigenous dogs and jackals with special reference to hook-worms.” Indian vet. J., 16, 7–9.Google Scholar
Africa, C. M. and Garcia, E. Y., 1935.—“Heterophyid trematodes of man and dog in the Philippines with descriptions of three new species.” Phillip. J. Set., 57, 253–207.Google Scholar
Africa, C. M., De Leon, Walfrido, AND Garcia, E. Y., 1940.—“Visceral complications in intestinal hcterophyidiasis of man.” Internal. Cong. Microbiol., 3, 447–449.Google Scholar
Alwar, V. S. and Lauta, C. M., 1958.—“Parasites of domestic cats (Felis catus) in Madras.” Internal. Cong. Microbiol., 35, 292–295.Google Scholar
Baugh, S. C, 1903.—“Contributions to our knowledge of digenetic trcmatodes VI.” Z.ParasitKde. 22,303–315.Google Scholar
Bhalerao, G. D., 1930.—“Studies on helminths of India: Trematoda III.” J. Helminth., 14,207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhalerao, G. D., 1947.—“Applied hclminthology: its past and future in India.” Proc. 2nd. Sci. Congr., 34, Part III, Section 7, 1–20.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. C, 1925.—“The helminthic parasites of cats in Calcutta and the relation of cats to human helminthic infections.” Indian, J. med. Res., 13, 213–227.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, P. N., 1948.—“On some heterophyid trematodcs of the genus Haplorchis Looss, 1899.” Proc. Ind. Sci. Congr., 34, Part III, Section 7, 175.Google Scholar
Chen, H. T., 1951.—“Stictodora manilensis and Stellantchastmts falcatus from Hongkong, with a note on the validity of other species of the two genera (Trematoda: Heterophyidae.)” Lingnan Sci. J., 23, 105–175.Google Scholar
Kuntz, R. E. and Chandler, A. C, 1950.—“Studies on Egyptian trematodcs with special reference to heterophyids of mammals: I Adult flukes with descriptions of Phagicola longicollis n. sp., Cynodiplostomum namrui n.sp., and a Stephanoprora from cats.” J. Parasit., 42, 445–459.Google Scholar
Maplestone, P. A. and Bhaduri, N. V., 1940.—“The helminth parasites of dogs in Calcutta and their bearing on human parasitology.” Indian J. med. Res., 28, 595–004.Google Scholar
Mudaliar, S. V. and Alwar, V. S., 1947.—“A check list of parasites (classes Trematoda and Cestoda) in the Department of Parasitology, Madras Veterinary College Laboratory.” Indian vet. J., 23, 423–434.Google Scholar
Pearson, J. C, 1904.—“A revision of the sub-family Haplorchinae Looss, 1899 (Trematoda: Heterophyidae) I. The Haphrchis group.” Parasitology, 54, 601–670.Google Scholar
Rao, B. V., 1958.—Thesis submitted to the University of Madras for the M.Sc. Degree.Google Scholar
Rao, M. A. N. and Ayyar, L. S., 1932.—“Helerophyes species from dogs in Madras.” Indian vet. J., 8, 251–252.Google Scholar
Rao, S. R. and Patil Kulkarni, V. G., 1904.—“Helminth parasites of cats (Felis domestica) in Bombay.” Bombay vet. Coll. Mag., (1963–1964), 11–12Google Scholar
Saxena, V. K., 1955.—“A new heterophyid trcmatodc Haphrchis rayii n.sp. (family Heterophyidae Odhner, 1914) from a kite. Milvus milvus migrans.” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. India, 24, (Sect. B), 61–66.Google Scholar
Sen, H. G., 1965.—“Heterophyes heterophyes from a dog in the western part of India.” Trans. P. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 59, 610.Google Scholar
Thapar, G. S., 1956.—“SyStematic survey of helminth parasites of domesticated animals in India.” Indian J. vet. Sci., 26, 211–272.Google Scholar
Wltenberg, G., 1929.—“Studies on the trematode family Heterophyidae.” Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 23, 131–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wltenberg, G.., 1953.—“Notes on Galactosomum and related genera (Trematoda: Heterophyidae).’ Thapar Commemoration Volume, Lucknow, 293–300.Google Scholar