Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T15:16:02.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Two New Species of Lytocestus from Burma and the Sudan Respectively*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

Jean A. Lynsdale
Jean A. Lynsdale
Affiliation:
From the Department of Parasitology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The sub-family Lytocestinae was created by Hunter (1927) to accommodate five genera—Lytocestus Cohn, 1908 (type genus), Balanotaenia Johnston, 1924, Monobothrioides Fuhrmann and Baer, 1925, Djombangie Bovien, 1926, and Lytocestoides Baylis, 1928. He based the characteristics of the sub-family on the broad characters of the type genus, e.g. “Sub-family Lytocestinae Hunter, 1927. Sub-family diagnosis: Caryophyllaeidae with sexual apertures and ovary situated in the last quarter of the body length. The inner longitudinal muscles lie entirely internal to the vitellaria which are annularly arranged about the muscles in the cortical parenchyma. Uterine glands are present. Type genus Lytocestus Cohn, 1908.” All the foregoing characteristics are present in Lytocestus. Sub-sequently, two more genera, Khawia Hsu, 1935, and Stocksia Woodland, 1937 have been added, making a total of seven genera.

According to Woodland (1926) the genus Lytocestus includes the following species: L. adhaerens Cohn, 1908 (type species), L. filiformis (Woodland, 1923), L. chalmersius (Woodland, 1924), L. cunningtoni (Fuhrmann and Baer, 1925), L. indicus (Moghe, 1925), and Balanotaenia bancrofti Johnston, 1924.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 30 , Issue 2-3 , October 1956 , pp. 87 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cohn, L., 1908.—“Die Anatomie eines neuen Fischcestoden.” Zbl. Bakt., 46, 134–139. (W.L. 23684.)Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. and Baer, J. G., 1925.—“Zoological results of the third Tanganyika Expedition conducted by Dr. W. A. Cunnington, 1904–5. Report on the cestoda.” Proc. zool. Soc. Land. 79–100. (W.L. 16969b.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, G. W. III, 1927.—Studies on the Caryophyllaeidae of North America. Illinois biol. Monogr, 11, 371–550.Google Scholar
Hunter, G. W. III, 1927.—“Notes on the Caryophyllaeidae of North America.” J. Parasit., 14, 16–26. (W.L. 11428.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, G. W. III, 1929.—“New Caryophyllaeidae from North America.” J. Parasit., 18, 185–192. (W.L. 11428.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, T. H., 1924.—“An Australian caryophyllaeid cestode.” Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 49, 339–347.Google Scholar
Moghe, M. A., 1925.—“Caryophyllaeus indicus, n.sp. (Trematoda) from the catfish (Clarias batrachus Bl).” Parasitology, 17, 232–235. (W.L. 1G035.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moghe, M. A., 1931.—“A supplementary description of Lytocestus indicus Moghe (Syn. Caryophyllaeus indicus Moghe, 1925. Cestoda).” Parasitology, 23, 84–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodland, W. N. F., 1923.—“On some remarkable new forms of Caryo-phyllaeidae from the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan and a revision of the families of the Cestodaria.” Quart. J. micr. Sci., 67, 435–472. (W.L. 17510.)Google Scholar
Woodland, W. N. F., 1924.—“On a new species of the cestodarian genus Caryophyllaeus froman Egyptian siluroid.” Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 529–532. (W.L. 16969b.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodland, W. N. F. 1926.—“On the genera and possible affinities of the Caryophyllaeidae.A reply to Drs. O. Fuhrmann and J. G. Baer.” Proc. zool. Soc. Lond, 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodland, W. N. F. 1937.—“Some cestodes from Sierra Leone. I. On Wenyonia longicauda sp.n. and Proteocephalus bivitellatus sp.n.” Proc. zool. Soc. Lond, 931–937.Google Scholar