Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:42:04.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The serodiagnosis of human hydatid disease: 1. The routine use of latex-agglutination and complement-fixation in diagnosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

Mabel W. Dighero
Affiliation:
Standards Laboratory, Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT
C. M. Patricia Bradstreet
Affiliation:
Standards Laboratory, Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT

Abstract

The combined use of complement fixation (CF) and latex agglutination (LA) tests is reported on sera from 6328 patients with suspected hydatid disease; 191 were confirmed positive at operation (‘known positives’). Results by LA are related to CF titres.

Both tests were negative in 90% of specimens. Nine patients were subsequently found infected of whom 3 became positive in tests after operation.

Of sera positive in both tests, 75% were from ‘known positives’. The remainder were almost certainly from infected patients.

Half the patients whose sera were La positive/CF⋜¼ were follow-up ‘known positives’ in whom CF titres had waned; 2 were early infections.

Only 3% of the cases with an LA negative/CF titre of ⋝1/16 were ‘known positives’ and 6% where the CF titre was 1/8. The remaining CF results in the group were false positives and accounted for 1.2% of all sera tested. Findings show that a CF titre ⋝1/8 with positive LA indicates past or present infection; a negative CF test with positive LA usually indicates past infection; rarely, infection is present when a CF titre is ⋝1/8 and LA is negative. A rising CF titre and positive LA indicates current infection; reliable prognosis following treatment is given by CF.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bradstreet, C. M. Patricia and Taylor, C. E. D. (1962) Technique of complement-fixation test applicable to the diagnosis of virus diseases. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service, 21, 96104.Google Scholar
Bradstreet, C. M. Patricia (1969) A study of two immunological tests in the diagnosis and prognosis of hydatid disease. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 2, 419433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischman, Andor. (1965) Reactivity of latex and complement fixation tests in hydatid disease. The Journal of Parasitology, 51, 497500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matossian, R. M., McLaren, M., Draper, C. C., Bradstreet, C. M. P., Dighero, M., Kane, G. J., Mackinlay, L. M. and Rickard, M. D. (1979) Studies on the serodiagnosis of hydatid disease: 2. using Indirect Haemagglutination (IHA), Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and Defined Antigen Substrate Spheres (DASS). Journal of Helminthology, 53, 287291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed