Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T17:49:52.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trichostrongylosis: a zoonotic disease of small ruminants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2023

A.H. Bhat*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Kashmir, Hazratbal-Srinagar 190006, India
H. Tak
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Kashmir, Hazratbal-Srinagar 190006, India
I.M. Malik
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Kashmir, Hazratbal-Srinagar 190006, India
B.A. Ganai
Affiliation:
Centre of Research for Development, University of Kashmir, Hazratbal-Srinagar 190006, India
N. Zehbi
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Central University of Kashmir, Ganderbal, Jammu and Kashmir 191131, India
*
Author for correspondence: A.H. Bhat, E-mail: bio.abid@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the present world a significant threat to human health is posed by zoonotic diseases. Helminth parasites of ruminants are one of the most common zoonotic organisms on the planet. Among them, trichostrongylid nematodes of ruminants, found worldwide, parasitize humans in different parts of the world with varying rates of incidence, particularly among rural and tribal communities with poor hygiene, pastoral livelihood and poor access to health services. In the Trichostrongyloidea superfamily, Haemonchus contortus, Teladorsagia circumcincta, Marshallagia marshalli, Nematodirus abnormalis and Trichostrongylus spp. are zoonotic in nature. Species of the genus Trichostrongylus are the most prevalent gastrointestinal nematode parasites of ruminants that transmit to humans. This parasite is prevalent in pastoral communities around the world and causes gastrointestinal complications with hypereosinophilia which is typically treated with anthelmintic therapy. The scientific literature from 1938 to 2022 revealed the occasional incidence of trichostrongylosis throughout the world with abdominal complications and hypereosinophilia as the predominant manifestation in humans. The primary means of transmission of Trichostrongylus to humans was found to be close contact with small ruminants and food contaminated by their faeces. Studies revealed that conventional stool examination methods such as formalin-ethyl acetate concentration or Willi's technique combined with polymerase chain reaction-based approaches are important for the accurate diagnosis of human trichostrongylosis. This review further found that interleukin 33, immunoglobulin E, immunoglobulin G1, immunoglobulin G2, immunoglobulin M, histamine, leukotriene C4, 6-keto prostaglandin F1α, and thromboxane B2 are vital in the fight against Trichostrongylus infection with mast cells playing a key role. This review focuses on the prevalence, pathogenicity and immunological aspects of Trichostrongylus spp. in humans.

Type
Review Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Parasites that we encounter in nature may be species-specific or may have a wide range of hosts. The latter are strenuous to control because they can lie dormant in their reservoir hosts for long periods of time before infecting other hosts. Similarly, zoonotic parasites are difficult to control and pose a concern to human health due to their proclivity for residing in diverse hosts (Allen et al., Reference Allen, Murray, Zambrana-Torrelio, Morse, Rondinini, Di Marco, Breit, Olival and Daszak2017). Livestock helminths, among other zoonotic viruses, bacteria and other infections, are a cause of health concern for humans (Libera et al., Reference Libera, Konieczny, Grabska, Szopka, Augustyniak and Pomorska-Mól2022). Helminth parasites that infect the livestock, significantly affect their health and reproduction (Rehman & Abidi, Reference Rehman and Abidi2022). Although Haemonchus contortus is considered as the notorious parasite of livestock because of its reproductive potential and blood sucking ability, Trichostrongylus remains one of the most frequent and extremely pathogenic parasites in cattle, and because of its zoonotic potential, Trichostrongylus is dangerous to human health (Getachew et al., Reference Getachew, Dorchies and Jacquiet2007). Human infection by Trichostrongylus is more prevalent in the pastoral communities who raise livestock or eat vegetables that are fecundated with faecal ordure. Humans become infected after consuming food or water contaminated with faeces of the definitive host (ruminant and humans). Gastrointestinal symptoms with disparate morbidity may develop in some patients; however, most patients are asymptomatic but have eosinophilia as the only symptom (Buonfrate et al., Reference Buonfrate, Angheben, Gobbi, Mistretta, Degani and Bisoffi2017). Till date, Trichostrongylus infections in humans have been reported only in a few parts of the world. The reason for such rarity in cases of human trichostrongylosis could most probably be the occurrence of asymptomatic infections and comparably less sensitivity of microscopic detection due to low egg-output (Buonfrate et al., Reference Buonfrate, Angheben, Gobbi, Mistretta, Degani and Bisoffi2017). As a result, there could be many undiagnosed cases of Trichostrongylus infection in the human populations worldwide (Wolfe, Reference Wolfe1978). Trichostrongylus is similar to hook worms, particularly Ancylostoma duodenale and Necator americanus concerning its transmission, pathophysiology and morphology at certain life-cycle stages; as a result, very little is known about the population biology and epidemiology of Trichostrongylus spp. (Yong et al., Reference Yong, Lee and Sim2007). There is lack of information regarding the global status of trichostrongylosis among humans. It is necessary to compile the pertinent scientific material and examine pastoral populations for the incidence of this parasite. Little to no work has been done on the pathogenicity and immune response to this worm in relation to humans. This review aims to compile literature about the: (a) pathogenesis of trichostrongylosis in humans; (b) immune response to Trichostrongylus invasion and its mechanism of action; and (c) epidemiology of this zoonotic parasite in relation to humans.

Life cycle and transmission

Using no intermediate host and exhibiting a direct life cycle, Trichostrongylus adults live in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) at particular micro-niches depending on the species. Females lay eggs in the host's GIT which are then excreted with the faeces of the host. As soon as the eggs are in a favourable environment, they embryonate into the L1-larvae which moults two times and develops into the infective L3-larvae in about five days and may remain viable for about six months (Levine & Anderson, Reference Levine and Anderson1973). Throughout the summer months of June to August, most trichostrongylid larvae occur on the grass blades representing greater chances of infection in grazing animals (Crofton, Reference Crofton1948). Cattle become infected after consuming the L3-larvae while feeding on contaminated grasses. Once ingested, L3-larvae of Trichostrongylus spp. reach the predilection site, for example, the L3-larvae stage of Trichostrongylus axei inhabits the abomasum of ruminants where they complete their development and the adult worms then penetrate the lining of the abomasum. In some other species, the L3-larvae reach the small intestine and invade the crypts to complete their development into L4 and L5 larval stages. Depending on the species and the host, the prepatent period is usually three to four weeks (Janquera, Reference Janquera2017) but can extend up to two years (Ralph et al., Reference Ralph, O'Sullivan, Sangster and Walker2006). Trichostrongylus colubriformis lives in mucoid passages on the surface of duodenal and intestinal villi (Shaw et al., Reference Shaw, McNeill, Maass, Hein, Barber, Wheeler and Shoemaker2003). Humans acquire trichostrongylosis when L3-larvae of Trichostrongylus spp. are ingested orally while consuming contaminated food. Application of night-soil (human excreta) or livestock faecal matter as manure and the resistant nature of the eggs gives rise to the propagation of this parasite in human populations (Sharma & Anand, Reference Sharma and Anand1997). Shady areas with high humidity and an abundance of grass are more favourable for the spread of Trichostrongylus (Watson, Reference Watson1953).

Methodology

Databases such as Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and ScienceDirect were searched to collect and review the published scientific research articles related to trichostrongylosis among humans. Terms such as Trichostrongylus, trichostrongylosis/liasis, zoonosis/es/tic, human, transmission, case/s, report, diagnosis, pathogenicity/sis, immunological, immune response, etc. were used in multiple combinations to search for relevant research articles. Further, the bibliographic section of research articles was also searched to extract relevant references. In addition to these, any other relevant research articles and/or case reports from other sources were also reviewed during the study. Research articles with information regarding number of cases in humans, method of diagnosis, symptoms, country name and/or pathogenesis and immune response were included in this study. Research articles related to other hosts were excluded. We used Endnote to compile the articles and then thoroughly read the papers to extract information such as year, country/region, number of cases, method of examination, mode of transmission, symptoms and any other important findings (table 1). Statistics from these articles are compiled in figs 3–5.

Table 1. Reported cases of human trichostrongylosis globally in scientific publications from 1938 to 2022.

Pathogenicity

Human trichostrongylosis is typically a minor, subclinical condition as indicated by the fact that diagnosed cases have only been identified through screening. Nevertheless, heavier infection may result in emaciation, pain in the abdomen and diarrhoea along with slight anaemia and eosinophilia in adults while causing retardation of development in children (Hollo et al., Reference Hollo, Rovo and Hidvegi1970). Persons with infection intensity of 24–300 eggs per gram (EPG) of faeces are symptomatic while an infection intensity below 24 EPG shows no symptoms (Ghadirian & Arfaa, Reference Ghadirian and Arfaa1975; Wolfe, Reference Wolfe1978). In small ruminants the symptoms of trichostrongylosis are more severe causing ‘black scour disease’ which is characterized by dark green to black diarrhoea, that covers the crutch, hocks and legs. There is extreme emaciation in heavily infected sheep with wasting of musculature and negligible amount of renal and omental fat (Edgar, Reference Edgar1933). Craig (Reference Craig, Anderson and Rings2009) reported that trichostrongylosis may lead to moderate anaemia as the worms may feed on the host's blood from mucosa of the gut. Histopathological studies carried out by Barker (Reference Barker1975) showed that T. colubriformis causes severe villus atrophy and plasma loss in the sheep gut. Acutely infected mucosa becomes flat, has stunted epithelium, with projecting crypts often leaking eosinophilic material, exhibiting hyperplasia with highly inflammated lamina propria due to cell infiltration. The intestinal epithelial surface has erosions and necrosis which may be most probably caused by operational movement of adult nematodes. In the case of Trichostrongylus vitrinus, exsheathed L3-larvae burrow through intestinal villi and form submucosal tunnels and when adults emerge out of these tunnels, they cause considerable damage to the mucosal layer (Beveridge et al., Reference Beveridge, Pullman, Phillips, Martin, Barelds and Grimson1989). Alterations in the intestinal morphology due to Trichostrongylus infection cause a decrease in the activity of enzymes such as alkaline phosphatase and leucine amino peptidase (Shayo & Benz, Reference Shayo and Benz1979). Though mildly pathogenic, Trichostrongylus may cause severe complications among young and weak livestock, sometimes proving fatal (fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Activity and development of Trichostrongylus sp. in intestine of host; L3-larvae stages burrow through epithelium resulting in damage to intestinal villi and enteritis. Then adults emerge out through tunnels into the lumen of intestine and occasionally suck blood from the intestinal vasculature which leads to anaemia.

Immune response

The aim of the parasite is to establish itself successfully in/on the host without killing it. To do so, the parasite manipulates the immune response of the host, and either the parasite evades the host immune system by different mechanisms or it alters the immune response of host to make it ineffective. To counter this, the host tries to mount an effective immune response against the parasite to kill and expel it. Usually in helminth infection, T helper 2 or Type 2 response is initiated by the host. It includes expression of interleukin-4, interleukin-5, interleukin-9, interleukin-13, interleukin-21, interleukin-33 (IL-33) and proliferation and activation of plasma cells to secrete immunoglobulin E (IgE), ocytess and mast cells to secrete vasoactive amines. With respect to trichostrongylosis in humans, limited research has been conducted on immunological response. An in vitro study using a co-culture system of T. colubriformis and epithelial cell from humans showed that movement of T. colubriformis at the site of infection creates necrosis of intestinal epithelial cells. The necrosis in turn induces the release of intracellular contents, including IL33 which is elemental in the commencement of appropriate host response to gastrointestinal nematodes (Andronicos et al., Reference Andronicos, McNally, Kotze, Hunt and Ingham2012). It has been found that after recurrent infections in natural conditions, sheep can develop immunity against T. colubriformis. In a natural foraging environment, the ability to withstand nematode establishment occurs after seven weeks of incessant infection (Dobson et al., Reference Dobson, Waller and Donald1990). When a sheep is fed with Trichostrongylus larvae, most of them are expelled in less than 24 h under a hypersensitivity response known as rapid rejection (Miller et al., Reference Miller, Jackson, Newlands and Huntley1985). The sheep shows resistance to Trichostrongylus by mounting an inflammatory response in gastro-intestinal mucosa which is evident by increase in mucosal mast cells and globule leucocytes (Miller et al., Reference Miller, Jackson, Newlands and Huntley1985; Douch et al., Reference Douch, Harrison, Elliott, Buchanan and Green1986). This inflammatory response seems to be genetically controlled and mast cells play a major role in resistance against Trichostrongylus (Gill, Reference Gill1991). When treated with parasite antigen, mast cells from resistant sheep release around 39% of cellular mast cell protease (CMCP) as compared to less than 8% CMCP release by mast cells from sheep with primary infection of Trichostrongylus (Bendixsen et al., Reference Bendixsen, Emery and Jones1995). Jones & Emery (Reference Jones and Emery1991) demonstrated that sheep immunized with T. colubriformis release a number of inflammatory mediators such as histamine, leukotriene C4, 6-keto prostaglandin F and thromboxane B2 on secondary infection with leukotriene C4 being the most predominant inflammatory mediator in expulsion of nematodes from intestines. In guinea pigs immunized with irradiated T. colubriformis larvae, release of biological amines (histamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine) and enteric plasma was found to be involved in resistance to secondary infections of this parasite (Steel et al., Reference Steel, Jones and Wagland1990).

Serum IgE levels have been found to escalate following nematode infections (Shaw et al., Reference Shaw, Morris, Green, Wheeler, Bisset, Vlassoff and Douch1999). Shaw et al. (Reference Shaw, McNeill, Maass, Hein, Barber, Wheeler and Shoemaker2003) found T. colubriformis aspartyl inhibitor (Tco-API-1) as a strong allergen that produces an overwhelming IgE response in sheep, when produced endogenously by nematode; however, when administered separately, Tco-API-1 does not evoke IgE response. In response against T. colubriformis, serum immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) titres elevate significantly by 35 days of infection with IgG1 being more persistent than IgM (Douch et al., Reference Douch, Risdon and Green1994). IgG1 and immunoglobulin G2 (IgG2) levels in gut associated lymphoid tissue were observed to be greater in Merino sheep during T. colubriformis larval rejection (McClure et al., Reference McClure, Emery, Wagaland and Jones1992). Treatment with the corticosteroid dexamethasone has been found to inhibit the progress of nematode resistance and reversibly reduce the expression of existing resistance in sheep, as indicated by higher faecal egg count and persistent weight loss. Dexamethasone functions by decreasing the production of leukotrienes and preventing the advent of mast cells in intestines (Douch et al., Reference Douch, Harrison, Elliott, Buchanan and Green1986, Reference Douch, Risdon and Green1994) and eosinophils in serum (Buddle et al., Reference Buddle, Jowett, Green, Douch and Risdon1992). Sheep also counter the nematodes by increased numbers of circulating antibodies and increased number of antibodies in the mucus of the intestine (Dawkins et al., Reference Dawkins, Windon, Outteridge and Dineen1988; Adams et al., Reference Adams, Anderson and Windon1989; McClure et al., Reference McClure, Emery, Wagaland and Jones1992). Rabbit develops resistance against Trichostrongylus retortaeformis through three ways viz: self-cure; inhibition of larval development; and prevention of establishment of infective larval stages (Michel, Reference Michel1952). All of these findings reveal that inflammatory response involving an interplay of different immune mediators including IL33, IgE, IgG1, IgG2, IgM, histamine, leukotriene C4, 6-keto prostaglandin F1α, and thromboxane B2 is vital in the fight against Trichostrongylus infection with mast cells playing a key role (fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Induction of Th2 immune response; Trichostrongylus colubriformis expressing allergen Tco-API-1, that is presented to Th2 cells by APC which releases cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IL-9 and IL-13) that activate other cells including mast cell, eosinophil and B-cells. B-cells produce allergen specific IgE which bind to worm surface by Fab region and eosinophil by Fc region to induce their degranulation in order to kill the parasite. Allergen can also bind to mast cell bound IgE to cause their degranulation. In addition, damaged intestinal epithelial cells release IL-33 which binds to ST-2 receptor expressed by cells such as mast cell, basophil and eosinophil to cause their degranulation. Abbreviations: Tco-API-1, Trichostrongylus colubriformis sspartyl inhibitor; Th2 cell, T-helper 2 cell; APC, antigen presenting cell; IL, interleukin; Fab, fragment antigen-binding; Fc, fragment crystallizable; ST-2 is an IL-33 receptor belonging to the IL-1 family.

Prevalence of Trichostrongylus in humans

Few investigations on Trichostrongylus have revealed its widespread occurrence in human communities around the world. Watson (Reference Watson1953) reported that 48 million people were infected with Trichostrongylus spp. globally. However, researches on the epidemiology of Trichostrongylus proclaim a global distribution but low prevalence of infection in humans (Ghadirian & Arfaa, Reference Ghadirian and Arfaa1975; Cancrini et al., Reference Cancrini, Boemi, Iori and Corselli1982; Millington et al., Reference Millington, Costa, Tavares, Dourado, Reid and Macedo1989; Boreham et al., Reference Boreham, McCowan, Ryan, Allworth and Robson1995; John & Petri, Reference John and Petri2006; Ralph et al., Reference Ralph, O'Sullivan, Sangster and Walker2006; Yong et al., Reference Yong, Lee and Sim2007). Ghadirian & Arfaa (Reference Ghadirian and Arfaa1975) estimated 67%, 86% and 71% prevalence of trichostrongylosis among humans in Isfahan, Bakhtiari and Khuzestan regions of Iran, respectively, with primary species being Trichostrongylus orientalis and T. colubriformis. Watthanakulpanich et al. (Reference Watthanakulpanich, Pongvongsa and Sanguankiat2013) found 36.9% prevalence in Thakamrien Savannakhet, Laos. Trichostrongylus infections often become misreported due to the resemblance of their eggs with those of hookworms, for example, in Lahanam Laos, 2011, 93.5% of positive hookworm cases were of Trichostrongylus (Sato et al., Reference Sato, Yoonuan, Sanguankiat, Nuamtanong and Pongvongsa2011). Joe (Reference Joe1947) reported 36.42% prevalence in Java, Indonesia. Very low prevalence of 0.5% and 1.2% was reported in Chile and Brazil, respectively (Torres et al., Reference Torres, Figueroa and Navarrete1972; Souza et al., Reference Souza, Souza, Menezes, Alcântara, Soares and Teixeira2013). Heydon & Green (Reference Heydon and Green1931) also reported a very low prevalence (0.3–0.4%) of trichostrongylosis in Queensland, Australia. Infection of T. orientalis has been reported in Armenia, China, Japan and Korea (John & Petri, Reference John and Petri2006). Species such as T. axei, Trichostrongylus capricola, T. colubriformis, T. orientalis, Trichostrongylus probolurus, Trichostrongylus skrjabin and T. vitrinus have been found associated with infections in humans with T. axei, T. colubriformis and T. orientalis being the most common species which infect humans, mostly obtained via close contact with livestock (Ghadirian & Arfaa, Reference Ghadirian and Arfaa1975; Millington et al., Reference Millington, Costa, Tavares, Dourado, Reid and Macedo1989; John & Petri, Reference John and Petri2006; Ralph et al., Reference Ralph, O'Sullivan, Sangster and Walker2006; Yong et al., Reference Yong, Lee and Sim2007). In Japan, the most predominant species among humans is T. orientalis which is also found in China and Korea (Miyazaki, Reference Miyazaki1991). Buonfrate et al. (Reference Buonfrate, Angheben, Gobbi, Mistretta, Degani and Bisoffi2017) reported four clusters of Trichostrongylus infection in Italy. Multiple cases were reported from different regions of Hungary from time to time as mentioned by Hollo et al. (Reference Hollo, Rovo and Hidvegi1970). El-Shazy et al. (Reference El Shazly, Awad, Sultan, Sadek, Khalil and Morsy2006) reported 2.6% prevalence of trichostrongylsis in Dakahlia, Egypt. Females of age group 41–50 have been found to be more susceptible to trichostrongylosis than males (Watthanakulpanich et al., Reference Watthanakulpanich, Pongvongsa and Sanguankiat2013) (figs 35).

Fig. 3. Countries (coloured) with reported cases of Trichostrongylus infection in humans; Human infection by Trichostrongylus spp. is documented in several countries and is not limited to any one geographical area. Comprehensive inspection of hookworm patients may indicate otherwise in nations where Trichostrongylus has not yet been reported, as trichostrongyle eggs are frequently mistaken for hookworm eggs.

Fig. 4. Human trichostrongylosis case count by country. It is evident that Iran has reported the highest number of cases of Trichostrongylus among humans, which can be attributed to higher screening among human populations in part and the rest for pastoral livelihood of people in rural areas of Iran.

Fig. 5. Year wise human trichostrongylosis cases reported in the scientific literature from 1938 to 2022. Between the years 2015 and 2020, the number of cases is comparatively higher because of increased testing in rural human communities. Investigations in other pastoral communities of the world may detect more infections of trichostrongylosis.

Discussion

Different studies on the incidence of Trichostrongylus prove that this parasite is prevalent among small ruminants worldwide and sporadically occurs in humans that live in close contact with these ruminants. This review, which included almost all cases of Trichostrongylus infection that had been reported and documented in the literature worldwide, showed that trichostrongylosis occur in people occasionally. A systematic review of Trichostrongylus infection in Iran by Rahimi-Esboei et al. (Reference Rahimi-Esboei, Pourhajibagher and Bahador2022) showed its prevalence to be 0.01%. However, in rural communities the prevalence is found to be higher (3.13%) (Sharifdini et al., Reference Sharifdini, Ghanbarzadeh, Barikani and Saraei2020). With ten species of Trichostrongylus reported in human beings, Iran has been a hotspot of human trichostrongylosis; globally, 11 species of Trichostrongylus have been linked to humans (Sharifdini et al., Reference Sharifdini, Derakhshani, Alizadeh, Ghanbarzadeh, Mirjalali, Mobedi and Saraei2017b). The metrics indicate that T. colubriformis, followed by other species, is the predominant species infecting humans around the world (Lattes et al., Reference Lattes, Ferte, Delaunay, Depaquit, Vassallo, Vittier, Kokcha, Coulibaly and Marty2011; Phosuk et al., Reference Phosuk, Intapan, Sanpool, Janwan, Thanchomnang, Sawanyawisuth, Morakote and Maleewong2013; Watthanakulpanich et al., Reference Watthanakulpanich, Pongvongsa and Sanguankiat2013; Gholami et al., Reference Gholami, Babamehmoodi, Abedian, Sharif, Shahbazi, Pagheh and Mehdi2015; Hidalgo et al., Reference Hidalgo, Gacitúa, Melo, Oberg, Herrera and Fonseca-Salamanca2020; Torres et al., Reference Torres, Arcos, Villa and Cerna2021; Du et al., Reference Du, Zhang and Dang2022) with Iran reporting the highest number of cases.

Most cases of human trichostrongylosis around the world have been revealed following a parasitological stool examination particularly using the FEAC technique on persons with gastrointestinal complications (diarrhoea, abdominal pain, weakness and loss of appetite) and eosinophilia. In family outbreaks of trichostrongylosis, some family members with hypereosinophilia prove negative for Trichostrongylus eggs on stool examination which can be attributed to a long prepatent period of the parasite, that is, four months to two years (Wolfe, Reference Wolfe1978; Boreham et al., Reference Boreham, McCowan, Ryan, Allworth and Robson1995; Ralph et al., Reference Ralph, O'Sullivan, Sangster and Walker2006). Saraei et al. (Reference Saraei, Ghanbarzadeh, Hajialilo, Barghandan, Amini and Sharifdini2019) showed a higher sensitivity of FEAC (95.8%) than the agar plate culture method (90.1%) in diagnosis of trichostrongylosis. However, a recent study showed that among conventional parasitological stool examination techniques, Willi's method is more sensitive (91.7%) followed by the agar plate culture method (52.8%), Harada–Mori culture (40.3%), FEAC (37.5%) and 5.6% for the wet mount technique (Pandi et al., Reference Pandi, Sharifdini, Ashrafi, Atrkar Roushan, Rahmati and Hajipour2021). The same study showed the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay to be highly sensitive (97.2%) and specific in diagnosing human trichostrongylosis. Recently, Mizani et al. (Reference Mizani, Gill, Daryani, Sarvi, Amouei, Katrimi and Sharif2017) the devised restriction enzyme-PCR assay for the detection of Trichostrongylus species, which has higher specificity to detect even 10 pg/ml of DNA from the sample. Arbabi et al. (Reference Arbabi, Hooshyar, Lotfinia and Bakhshi2020) developed the PCR-high resolution melting assay for the diagnosis of Trichostrongylus species with higher specificity in differentiating T. colubriformis, T. capricula, T. vitrinus and T. probblorous. Most research to date has used the FEAC approach to diagnose human trichostrongylosis, which has lower sensitivity than Willi's method in conventional methods. Therefore, many more cases of trichostrongylosis can be discovered if human populations are screened using highly specific PCR along with the conventional Willi's and FEAC approaches.

Even though helminth zoonoses are declining globally, research has shown that warming caused by climate change, in particular, may eventually lead to a rise in helminth infections. The cause of this is that warming would lessen these helminths’ larval arrest including Trichostrongylus, and so lengthen the time of year when the free-living larval stages would be active. This would result in a rise in the rates of inadvertent human and livestock ingestion of larval stages, as well as the rates of infection (Dobson & Hudson, Reference Dobson and Hudson1992; Mas-Coma et al., Reference Mas-Coma, Valero and Bargues2008). This review indicates that contamination of food (vegetables) by livestock faeces is the main source of trichostrongylosis among humans which is further enhanced by rainfall due to dispersal of faecal material (Ghadirian & Arfaa, Reference Ghadirian and Arfaa1973; Ashrafi et al., Reference Ashrafi, Sharifdini, Heidari, Rahmati and Kia2020; Hidalgo et al., Reference Hidalgo, Gacitúa, Melo, Oberg, Herrera and Fonseca-Salamanca2020). Along with close proximity to livestock, consumption of untreated wild aromatic plants, use of animal dung as fuel (common among rural residents), unhygienic eating practises, use of livestock manure as fertilizer, weakened immune system and advanced age are some other risk factors linked to the rising incidence of human trichostrongylosis (Ashrafi et al., Reference Ashrafi, Sharifdini, Heidari, Rahmati and Kia2020; Rahimi-Esboei et al., Reference Rahimi-Esboei, Pourhajibagher and Bahador2022). In light of many proven ill effects of chemical fertilizers, organic farming with use of animal dung as fertilizer is becoming common among rural areas which could further increase the incidence of human trichostrongylosis and other zoonotic diseases in the near future (Ashrafi et al., Reference Ashrafi, Sharifdini, Heidari, Rahmati and Kia2020). Livestock being our most important source of meat and dairy must be monitored for helminth infections regularly through parasitological stool examination and be given periodic anthelmintic doses in order to prevent spillover of helminthiasis to humans. Proper hygiene decreases the rate of helminth infection greatly (Vaz Nery et al., Reference Vaz Nery, Pickering, Abate, Asmare, Barrett, Benjamin-Chung and Brooker2019). Even though developed countries with advanced health care and proper hygiene have managed to curb the helminth infections, the ‘hygiene hypothesis’ and related studies have correlated the decrease in helminth infections with the increase of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases among human population as research proves that helminth infection in early stages of life are important contributors to the proper development of the immune system (Rook, Reference Rook2012). With an increasing trend of anthelmintic resistance among different helminths, immunological studies among small ruminants in the direction of identifying potential antigenic proteins for the development of a vaccine against Trichostrongylus and other economically important nematodes in general are necessary. Pathogenicity has not been investigated in humans due to minimal number of infections. However, in sheep, Trichostrongylus causes high morbidity ranging from diarrhoea, severe degradation of intestinal wall to even mortality, which is more obvious in lambs. With the advent of new zoonotic diseases in the world, studies are needed to be conducted over these neglected mild pathogenic parasites to better understand their zoonotic potential and accordingly devise management strategies in the future.

Conclusion

The purpose of this review was to compile data regarding human trichostrongylosis in order to gain insights into the epidemiological, immunological and pathogenic aspects of Trichostrongylus species among humans. It was found that trichostrongylosis occurs among pastoral communities across the globe particularly in tropical countries. The majority of cases have been identified by traditional faecal examination techniques such as FEAC, however with the development of highly precise PCR-based approaches, it is important to combine these advanced techniques with traditional ones to accurately identify Trichostrongylus and other zoonotic helminths infecting humans. Most of the cases have been linked to the close association with the small ruminants or consumption of contaminated food. More investigations on human trichostrongylosis have led to an upsurge in instances being reported in recent years. With the recent finding of Trichostrongylus longispicularis among humans in Iran, the number of species associated with humans in this genus has increased to 11.

Further investigations are needed to be done to know the zoonotic potential and disease status of trichostrongylosis around the world. With meagre pathogenic studies and lack of information regarding the mechanism of immune response against Trichostrongylus spp., these two fields have remained unexplored; further research is needed in this direction to gather insights about the histological and physiological changes associated with human trichostrongylosis. Ruminants being an important source of food and other products, close association of humans with these domesticated animals is inevitable. In light of the emergence of new species of Trichostrongylus in humans, it is crucial to study their pathogenicity and zoonotic potential. Furthermore, it is recommended to devise proper management strategies in order to check the transmission of such zoonotic parasites in the future.

Financial support

The authors acknowledge financial support for this study from the Human Resource Development Group Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (HRDGCSIR), India and University of Kashmir.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Ethical standards

We, as authors of this review article, have made every effort to conduct a thorough and unbiased evaluation of the literature on the topic at hand. We have taken care to ensure that all sources are properly cited. We have also strived to maintain objectivity and accuracy in our interpretation of the data, and have not allowed personal biases to influence our conclusions. It is our hope that this review article will provide readers with a fair and comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge on the subject.

References

Adams, DB, Anderson, BH and Windon, RG (1989) Cross immunity between Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus colubriformis in sheep. International Journal for Parasitology 19(7), 717722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, T, Murray, KA, Zambrana-Torrelio, C, Morse, SS, Rondinini, C, Di Marco, M, Breit, N, Olival, KJ and Daszak, P (2017) Global hotspots and correlates of emerging zoonotic diseases. Nature Communications 8(1), 110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andronicos, NM, McNally, J, Kotze, AC, Hunt, PW and Ingham, A (2012) Trichostrongylus colubriformis larvae induce necrosis and release of IL33 from intestinal epithelial cells in vitro: implications for gastrointestinal nematode vaccine design. International Journal for Parasitology 42(3), 295304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arbabi, M, Hooshyar, H, Lotfinia, M and Bakhshi, MA (2020) Molecular detection of Trichostrongylus species through PCR followed by high resolution melt analysis of ITS-2 rDNA sequences. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 236, 111260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashrafi, K, Tahbaz, A, Sharifdini, M and Mas-Coma, S (2015) Familial Trichostrongylus infection misdiagnosed as acute fascioliasis. Emerging Infectious Diseases 21(10), 18691870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashrafi, K, Sharifdini, M, Heidari, Z, Rahmati, B and Kia, EB (2020) Zoonotic transmission of Teladorsagia circumcincta and Trichostrongylus species in Guilan province, northern Iran: molecular and morphological characterizations. BMC Infectious Diseases 20(1), 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Babamahmoodi, F, Ahangarkani, F, Bahrami Dounchali, F and Nikbakht, A (2020) Trichostronyliasis outbreak in North of Iran. Tabari Biomedical Student Research Journal 2(4). http://tbsrj.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-3720-en.html.Google Scholar
Barker, IK (1975) Intestinal pathology associated with Trichostrongylus colubriformis infection in sheep: histology. Parasitology 70(2), 165171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bendixsen, T, Emery, DL and Jones, WO (1995) The sensitization of mucosal mast cells during infections with Trichostrongylus colubriformis or Haemonchus contortus in sheep. International Journal for Parasitology 25(6), 741748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beveridge, I, Pullman, AL, Phillips, PH, Martin, RR, Barelds, A and Grimson, R (1989) Comparison of the effects of infection with Trichostrongylus colubriformis, T. vitrinus and T. rugatus in Merino lambs. Veterinary Parasitology 32(2-3), 229245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boreham, RE, McCowan, MJ, Ryan, AE, Allworth, AM and Robson, JM (1995) Human trichostrongylosis in Queensland. Pathology 27(2), 182185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchekoua, N, Garbouri, M, Ben, R and Triki, S (1977) A case of trichostrongyliasis. Tunisie Médicale 55(6), 405406.Google Scholar
Bradbury, R (2006) An imported case of trichostrongylid infection in Tasmania and a review of human trichostrongylidiosis. Annals of the ACTM: An International Journal of Tropical and Travel Medicine 7(2), 2528.Google Scholar
Buddle, BM, Jowett, G, Green, RS, Douch, PGC and Risdon, PL (1992) Association of blood eosinophilia with the expression of resistance of Romney lambs to nematodes. International Journal for Parasitology 22(7), 955960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buonfrate, D, Angheben, A, Gobbi, F, Mistretta, M, Degani, M and Bisoffi, Z (2017) Four clusters of Trichostrongylus infection diagnosed in a single center, in Italy. Infection 45(2), 233236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cancrini, G, Boemi, G, Iori, A and Corselli, A (1982) Human infestations by Trichostrongylus axei, T. capricola and T. vitrinus: 1st report in Italy. Parasitologia 24(2–3), 145149.Google Scholar
Chenken, JR and Moss, ES (1938) Trichostrongylus colubriformis in the human appendix. Report of a case in Louisiana. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 24(1), 15–17.Google Scholar
Cotin, M, Talis, B and Wertheim, G (1972) Clinical and therapeutic aspects of Trichostrongylus colubriformis (Nematoda–Trichostrongylidae) infection in man. Harefuah 83(1), 2654.Google ScholarPubMed
Craig, TM (2009) Helminth parasites of the ruminant gastrointestinal tract. pp. 7891 In Anderson, DE and Rings, DM (Eds) Food animal practice. 5th edn. Amsterdam, Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crofton, HD (1948) The ecology of immature phases of trrichostrongyle nematodes: I. the vertical distribution of infective larvae of Trichostrongylus retortaeformis in relation to their habitat. Parasitology 39(1–2), 1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, HJS, Windon, RG, Outteridge, PM and Dineen, JK (1988) Cellular and humoral responses of sheep with different levels of resistance to Trichostrongylus colubriformis. International Journal for Parasitology 18(4), 531537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, AP and Hudson, PJ (1992) Regulation and stability of a free-living host–parasite system, Trichostrongylus tenuis in red grouse. II: population models. Journal of Animal Ecology 61, 487498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, RJ, Waller, PJ and Donald, AD (1990) Population dynamics of Trichostrongylus colubriformis in sheep: the effect of infection rate on the establishment of infective larvae and parasite fecundity. International Journal for Parasitology 20(3), 347352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douch, PGC, Harrison, GBL, Elliott, DC, Buchanan, LL and Green, RS (1986) Relationship of gastrointestinal histology and mucus antiparasite activity with the development of resistance to trichostrongyle infections in sheep. Veterinary Parasitology 20(4), 315321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douch, PGC, Risdon, PL and Green, RS (1994) Antibody responses of sheep to challenge with Trichostrongylus colubriformis and the effect of dexamethasone treatment. International Journal of Parasitology 24(7), 921928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Du, B, Zhang, L, Dang, W, et al. (2022) A sheepherder with a severe diarrhea caused by Trichostrongylus colubriformis. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease 48, 102325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edgar, G (1933) Some observations on trichostrongylosis of young sheep. Australian Veterinary Journal 9(4), 149154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Shazly, AM, Awad, SE, Sultan, DM, Sadek, GS, Khalil, HH and Morsy, TA (2006) Intestinal parasites in Dakahlia governorate, with different techniques in diagnosing protozoa. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology 36(3), 10231034.Google ScholarPubMed
Farahmandian, E, Arfaa, F and Jalali, H (1977) Evaluation of the effect of oxantel–pyrantel on various soil transmitted helminths in Iran. Iranian Journal of Public Health 6(2), 4652.Google Scholar
Getachew, T, Dorchies, P and Jacquiet, P (2007) Trends and challenges in the effective and sustainable control of Haemonchus contortus infection in sheep. Review. Parasite 14(1), 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghadirian, E and Arfaa, FNMN (1973) First report of human infection with Haemonchus contortus, Ostertagia ostertagi, and Marshallagia marshalli (family Trichostrongylidae) in Iran. Journal of Parasitology 59(6), 11441145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghadirian, E and Arfaa, F (1975) Present status of trichostrongyliasis in Iran. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 24(6), 935941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghadirian, E, Arfaa, F and Sadighian, A (1974) Human infection with Trichostrongylus capricola in Iran. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 23(5), 10021003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghanbarzadeh, L, Saraei, M, Kia, EB, Amini, F and Sharifdini, M (2019) Clinical and haematological characteristics of human trichostrongyliasis. Journal of Helminthology 93(2), 149153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gholami, S, Babamehmoodi, F, Abedian, R, Sharif, M, Shahbazi, A, Pagheh, A and Mehdi, F (2015) Trichostrongylus colubriformis: possible most common cause of human infection in Mazandaran Province, North of Iran. Iranian Journal of Parasitology 10(1), 110115.Google Scholar
Gill, HS (1991) Genetic control of acquired resistance to haemonchosis in Merino lambs. Parasite Immunology 13(6), 617628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heydon, GAM and Bearup, AJ (1939) A further case of human infection with Trichostrongylus colubriformis in New South Wales. Medical Journal of Australia 1(18), 694–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heydon, GM and Green, AK (1931) Some worm infestations of man in Australia. Medical Journal of Australia 21(1), 619628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hidalgo, A, Gacitúa, P, Melo, A, Oberg, C, Herrera, C and Fonseca-Salamanca, F (2020) First molecular characterization of Trichostrongylus colubriformis infection in rural patients from Chile. Acta Parasitologica 65(3), 790795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollo, F, Rovo, JT and Hidvegi, Z (1970) A recent case of human Trichostrongylus infection in Hungary. Parasitologia Hungarica 3(1), 159168.Google Scholar
Irisarri-Gutiérrez, MJ, Muñoz-Antolí, C, Acosta, L, Parker, LA, Toledo, R, Bornay-Llinares, FJ and Esteban, JG (2016) Hookworm-like eggs in children's faecal samples from a rural area of Rwanda. African Health Sciences 16(1), 8388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janquera, P (2017) Trichostrongylus spp. parasitic roundworms of cattle, sheep, goats, pigs and horses: biology, prevention and control. Available at https://Parasitipedia.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2628&Itemid=2908 (accessed January 2023).Google Scholar
Jawad, H (1952) Four cases of trichostrongyliasis in Iraq. Journal of the Faculty of Medicine, Baghdad 16(2), 6870.Google Scholar
Joe, LK (1947) Trichostrongylus infection in man and domestic animals in Java. Journal of Parasitology 33(4), 359–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, DT and Petri, WA (2006) The intestinal nematodes. Markell and Voge's medical parasitology. pp. 266267. 9th edn. St Louis, USA, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Jones, WO and Emery, DL (1991) Demonstration of a range of inflammatory mediators released in trichostrongylosis of sheep. International Journal for Parasitology 21(3), 361363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lattes, S, Ferte, S, Delaunay, P, Depaquit, J, Vassallo, M, Vittier, M, Kokcha, S, Coulibaly, E and Marty, P (2011) Trichostrongylus colubriformis nematode infections in humans, France. Emerging Infectious Diseases 7(17), 13011302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, D and Anderson, L (1973) Development and survival of Trichostrongylus colubriformis on pasture. Journal of Parasitology 59(1), 147165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libera, K, Konieczny, K, Grabska, J, Szopka, W, Augustyniak, A and Pomorska-Mól, M (2022) Selected livestock-associated zoonoses as a growing challenge for public health. Infectious Disease Reports 14(1), 6381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markell, EK (1968) Pseudohookworm infection—trichostrongyliasis: treatment with thiabendazole. New England Journal of Medicine 278(15), 831832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mas-Coma, S, Valero, MA and Bargues, MD (2008) Effects of climate change on animal and zoonotic helminthiases. Revue Scientifique et Technique 27(2), 443457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClure, SJ, Emery, DL, Wagaland, BM and Jones, WO (1992) A serial study of rejection of Trichosfrongylus colubriformis by immune sheep. International Journal for Parasitology 22(2), 227234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, JF (1952) Inhibition of development of Trichostrongylus retortaeformis. Nature 169(4309), 933934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, HRP, Jackson, F, Newlands, GFJ and Huntley, JF (1985) Rapid expulsion of gastrointestinal nematodes in the sheep: a role for immediate hypersensitivity reactions in the mucosa. pp. 460479. In Morris B and Miyasaka M (Eds) Immunology of the sheep. Basel, Switzerland, Basel Institute for Immunology.Google Scholar
Millington, MA, Costa, CH, Tavares, AM, Dourado, H, Reid, WA and Macedo, V (1989) Detection of helminthiasis with the Kato–Katz, Baermann–Moraes and Harada methods, in Tefé and various villages by the Japurá-Caquetá River, Amazonas. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical 22(4), 217218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyazaki, I (1991) An illustrated book of helminthic zoonoses. Fukuoka, Japan, International Medical Foundation of Japan. Shukosha Printing.Google Scholar
Mizani, A, Gill, P, Daryani, A, Sarvi, S, Amouei, A, Katrimi, AB and Sharif, M (2017) A multiplex restriction enzyme-PCR for unequivocal identification and differentiation of Trichostrongylus species in human samples. Acta Tropica 173(1), 180184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'teal, R and Magath, TB (1947) Trichostrongylus infection of human beings: report of three cases. Proceedings of Staff Meetings of the Mayo Clinic 22(10), 193197.Google Scholar
Pandi, M, Sharifdini, M, Ashrafi, K, Atrkar Roushan, Z, Rahmati, B and Hajipour, N (2021) Comparison of molecular and parasitological methods for diagnosis of human trichostrongylosis. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 11(75), 9396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phosuk, I, Intapan, PM, Sanpool, O, Janwan, P, Thanchomnang, T, Sawanyawisuth, K, Morakote, N and Maleewong, W (2013) Short report: molecular evidence of Trichostrongylus colubriformis and Trichostrongylus axei infections in humans from Thailand and Lao PDR. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 89(2), 376379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phosuk, I, Intapan, MP, Prasongdee, KT, Changtrakul, Y, Sanpool, O, Janwan, P and Maleewong, W (2015) Human trichostrongylosis: a hospital case series. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 46(2), 191197.Google Scholar
Poirriez, J, Dei-Cas, E, Guevart, E, Abdellatifi, M, Giard, P and Vernes, A (1984a) Human infestation by Trichostrongylus vitrinus in Morocco. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée 59(6), 636638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poirriez, J, Pais, G, Pais-Rajamma, C and Vernes, A (1984b) Human trichostrongyliasis in India. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 78(3), 425426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rahimi-Esboei, B, Pourhajibagher, M and Bahador, A (2022) Prevalence of human trichostrongyliasis in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reviews in Medical Microbiology 33(1), 1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralph, A, O'Sullivan, MV, Sangster, NC and Walker, JC (2006) Abdominal pain and eosinophilia in suburban goat keepers – trichostrongylosis. Medical Journal of Australia 184(9), 467469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehman, A and Abidi, SMA (2022) Livestock health: current status of helminth infections and their control for sustainable development. In Sobti RC (Ed.) Advances in animal experimentation and modeling. pp. 365378. Aligarh, India, Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rook, GA (2012) Hygiene hypothesis and autoimmune diseases. Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology 42(1), 515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saraei, M, Ghanbarzadeh, L, Hajialilo, E, Barghandan, T, Amini, F and Sharifdini, M (2019) Comparison of nutrient agar plate culture and formalin-ethyl acetate concentration methods in diagnosis of human trichostrongyliasis. Journal of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences 18(4), 506514.Google Scholar
Sato, M, Yoonuan, T, Sanguankiat, S, Nuamtanong, S and Pongvongsa, T (2011) Short report: human Trichostrongylus colubriformis infection in a Rural Village in Laos. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 84(1), 5254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharifdini, M, Heidari, Z, Hesari, Z, Vatandoost, S and Kia, EB (2017a) Molecular phylogenetics of Trichostrongylus species (Nematoda: Trichostrongylidae) from humans of Mazandaran Province, Iran. The Korean Journal of Parasitology 55(3), 279285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharifdini, M, Derakhshani, S, Alizadeh, SA, Ghanbarzadeh, L, Mirjalali, H, Mobedi, I and Saraei, M (2017b) Molecular identification and phylogenetic analysis of human Trichostrongylus species from an endemic area of Iran. Acta Tropica 176(1), 293299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharifdini, M, Ghanbarzadeh, L, Barikani, A and Saraei, M (2020) Prevalence of intestinal parasites among rural inhabitants of Fouman, Guilan Province, Northern Iran with emphasis on Strongyloides stercoralis. Iranian Journal of Parasitology 15(1), 91100.Google ScholarPubMed
Sharma, S and Anand, N (1997) Parasitic diseases: an overview. Pharmacochemistry Library 25(1), 145.Google Scholar
Shaw, RJ, Morris, CA, Green, RS, Wheeler, M, Bisset, SA, Vlassoff, A and Douch, PGC (1999) Genetic and phenotypic parameters for Trichostrongylus colubriformis-specific immunoglobulin E and its relationships with anti-Trichostrongylus colubriformis antibody, immunoglobulin G1, faecal egg count and body weight traits in grazing Romney lambs. Livestock Production Science 58(1), 2532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, RJ, McNeill, MM, Maass, DR, Hein, WR, Barber, TK, Wheeler, M and Shoemaker, CB (2003) Identification and characterisation of an aspartyl protease inhibitor homologue as a major allergen of Trichostrongylus colubriformis. International Journal for Parasitology 33(11), 12331243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shayo, ME and Benz, GW (1979) Histopathologic and histochemic changes in the small intestine of calves infected with Trichostrongylus colubriformis. Veterinary Parasitology 5(4), 353364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souza, RP, Souza, JN, Menezes, JF, Alcântara, LM, Soares, NM and Teixeira, MCA (2013) Human infection by Trichostrongylus spp. in residents of urban areas of Salvador city, Bahia, Brazil. Biomedica 33(3), 439445.Google Scholar
Steel, J, Jones, W and Wagland, B (1990) The response of immune sheep to challenge with Trichostrongylus colubriformis: enteric plasma loss and secretion of biogenic amines. International Journal for Parasitology 20(8), 10671073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torres, P, Figueroa, L and Navarrete, N (1972) Trichostrongylosis en la provincia de Valdivia, Chile [Trichostrongylosis in the province of Valdivia, Chile]. Boletín Chileno de Parasitología 27(1), 5255. [In Spanish.]Google ScholarPubMed
Torres, HP, Arcos, BA, Villa, AE and Cerna, DO (2021) Family outbreak caused by the nematode Trichostrongylus colubriformis in a rural area of the province of Valdivia: a rare occurrence zoonoses. Revista Chilena de Infectología: Órgano Oficial de la Sociedad Chilena de Infectología 38(3), 455460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaz Nery, S, Pickering, AJ, Abate, E, Asmare, A, Barrett, L, Benjamin-Chung, J and Brooker, SJ (2019) The role of water, sanitation and hygiene interventions in reducing soil-transmitted helminths: interpreting the evidence and identifying next steps. Parasites & Vectors 12(1), 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wall, EC, Bhatnagar, N, Watson, J and Doherty, T (2011) An unusual case of hypereosinophilia and abdominal pain: an outbreak of Trichostrongylus imported from New Zealand. Journal of Travel Medicine 18(1), 5960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, L, Henkin, R and Mathies, AW (1956) Trichostrongylus infestation with profound eosinophilia. Annals of Internal Medicine 45(1), 146150.Google Scholar
Watson, JM (1953) Human trichostrongylosis and its relationship to ancylostomiasis in southern Iraq, with comments on world incidence. Parasitology 43(1–2), 102109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watthanakulpanich, D, Pongvongsa, T, Sanguankiat, S, et al. (2013) Prevalence and clinical aspects of human Trichostrongylus colubriformis infection in Lao PDR. Acta Tropica 126(1), 3742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfe, MS (1978) Oxyuris, Trichostrongylus and Trichuris. Clinics in Gastroenterology 7(1), 201217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yong, TS, Lee, JH, Sim, S, et al. (2007) Differential diagnosis of Trichostrongylus and hookworm eggs via PCR using ITS-1 sequence. Korean Journal of Parasitology 45(1), 6974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Reported cases of human trichostrongylosis globally in scientific publications from 1938 to 2022.

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Activity and development of Trichostrongylus sp. in intestine of host; L3-larvae stages burrow through epithelium resulting in damage to intestinal villi and enteritis. Then adults emerge out through tunnels into the lumen of intestine and occasionally suck blood from the intestinal vasculature which leads to anaemia.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Induction of Th2 immune response; Trichostrongylus colubriformis expressing allergen Tco-API-1, that is presented to Th2 cells by APC which releases cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IL-9 and IL-13) that activate other cells including mast cell, eosinophil and B-cells. B-cells produce allergen specific IgE which bind to worm surface by Fab region and eosinophil by Fc region to induce their degranulation in order to kill the parasite. Allergen can also bind to mast cell bound IgE to cause their degranulation. In addition, damaged intestinal epithelial cells release IL-33 which binds to ST-2 receptor expressed by cells such as mast cell, basophil and eosinophil to cause their degranulation. Abbreviations: Tco-API-1, Trichostrongylus colubriformis sspartyl inhibitor; Th2 cell, T-helper 2 cell; APC, antigen presenting cell; IL, interleukin; Fab, fragment antigen-binding; Fc, fragment crystallizable; ST-2 is an IL-33 receptor belonging to the IL-1 family.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Countries (coloured) with reported cases of Trichostrongylus infection in humans; Human infection by Trichostrongylus spp. is documented in several countries and is not limited to any one geographical area. Comprehensive inspection of hookworm patients may indicate otherwise in nations where Trichostrongylus has not yet been reported, as trichostrongyle eggs are frequently mistaken for hookworm eggs.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Human trichostrongylosis case count by country. It is evident that Iran has reported the highest number of cases of Trichostrongylus among humans, which can be attributed to higher screening among human populations in part and the rest for pastoral livelihood of people in rural areas of Iran.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Year wise human trichostrongylosis cases reported in the scientific literature from 1938 to 2022. Between the years 2015 and 2020, the number of cases is comparatively higher because of increased testing in rural human communities. Investigations in other pastoral communities of the world may detect more infections of trichostrongylosis.