Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:52:40.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hackerspaces: a case study in the creation and management of a common pool resource

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2015

MICHAEL R. WILLIAMS  and
JOSHUA C. HALL
MICHAEL R. WILLIAMS*
Affiliation:
Olson, Minneapolis, MN 55401, USA
JOSHUA C. HALL*
Affiliation:
College of Business and Economics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA
*
*Email: michael.roy.w@gmail.com
**Email: joshua.c.hall@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hackerspaces are community-operated physical places where individuals get together to build things. While the organization itself is private, the ‘space’ that is created for individuals to work has elements of a common pool resource (CPR). The previous literature finds technology to be important in effective CPR management. Through an ethnographic study of a hackerspace, we show how technology is crucial for management of the ‘space’. In addition, we highlight how technology is used in hackerspaces to satisfy three of Ostrom's design principles for stable CPR management.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , December 2015 , pp. 769 - 781
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avouyi-Dovi, S. and Matheron, J. (2007), ‘Technology Shocks and Monetary Policy: Revisiting the Fed's Performance’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 39 (2/3): 471–507.Google Scholar
Calef, D. and Goble, R. (2007), ‘The Allure of Technology: How France and California Promoted Electric and Hybrid Vehicles to Reduce Urban Air Pollution’, Policy Sciences, 40 (1): 1–34.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. (1974), ‘The Lighthouse in Economics’, Journal of Law and Economics, 17 (2): 357–376.Google Scholar
De Alessi, M. (2003), ‘Technology, Marine Conservation, and Fisheries Management’, in Foldvary, F. and Klein, D. (eds.), The Half-life of Policy Rationales: How New Technology Affects Old Policy Issues, New York: NYU Press, pp. 21–37.Google Scholar
de Tocqueville, A. ([1840] 1984), Democracy in America, New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Foldvary, F. (2003), ‘The Lighthouse as a Private-Sector Collective Good’, in Foldvary, F. and Klein, D. (eds.), The Half-life of Policy Rationales: How New Technology Affects Old Policy Issues, New York: NYU Press, pp. 38–46.Google Scholar
Garzarelli, G. (2004), ‘Open Source Software and the Economics of Organization’, in Birner, J. and Garrouste, P. (eds.), Austrian Perspectives on the Internet Economy: Markets, Information and Communication, London: Routledge, pp. 47–62.Google Scholar
Klein, D. (2003), ‘Fencing the Airshed’, in Foldvary, F. and Klein, D. (eds.), The Half-life of Policy Rationales: How New Technology Affects Old Policy Issues, New York: NYU Press, pp. 86–106.Google Scholar
Langlois, R. and Garzarelli, G. (2008), ‘Of Hackers and Hairdressers: Modularity and the Organizational Economics of Open-source Collaboration’, Industry and Innovation, 15 (2): 125–143.Google Scholar
Moreno, G. and Sunding, D. (2005), ‘Joint Estimation of Technology Adoption and Land Allocation with Implications for the Design of Conservation Policy’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87 (4): 1009–1019.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2005), Understanding Institutional Diversity, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2010), ‘Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems’, American Economic Review, 100 (3): 641–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, E. (2001), The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary, Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
Schweik, C. (2000), ‘Optimal Foraging, Institutions, and Forest Change: A Case from Nepal’, in Gibson, C., McKean, M., and Ostrom, E. (eds.), People and Forests: Communities, Institutions, and Governance, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 99–134.Google Scholar