Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T09:24:38.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What makes prosecutors independent? Analysing the institutional determinants of prosecutorial independence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2017

STEFAN VOIGT  and
ALEXANDER J. WULF
STEFAN VOIGT
Affiliation:
Institute of Law and Economics, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
ALEXANDER J. WULF*
Affiliation:
Institute of Law and Economics, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, and SRH Hochschule Berlin, Berlin, Germany
*
*Email: alexander.wulf@srh-hochschule-berlin.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The prosecution of criminal suspects is an integral part of a country's justice system. While substantial scholarly attention has been devoted to the study of the police and judges and their relevance to the rule of law, surprisingly little is known about prosecutors. The aim of this paper is to contribute towards filling this knowledge gap. We first demonstrate the rising importance of prosecutors in criminal justice systems around the world. We identify the independence of prosecution agencies from the other two branches of government as a centrally important characteristic and then proceed to analyse the determinants of de facto prosecutorial independence from a political economy perspective. We find that press freedom, the immunity of parliamentarians and belonging to the common law tradition are positively associated with higher de facto independence.

Type
Symposium on the Empirics of Judicial Institutions
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , February 2019 , pp. 99 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S. and Wacziarg, R. (2003), ‘Fractionalization’, Journal of Economic Growth, 8 (2): 155–94.Google Scholar
Easterly, W. and Levine, R. (1997), ‘Africa's growth tragedy. policies and ethnic divisions’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (4): 1203–50.Google Scholar
European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (2014), European Judicial Systems: Edition 2014 (2012 data). Efficiency and Quality of Justice, Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.Google Scholar
Eurostat (2015a), Crimes Recorded by the Police, Brussels: Eurostat.Google Scholar
Eurostat (2015b), Crimes Recorded by the Police: Historical Data (Total Crime) 1950–2000, Brussels: Eurostat.Google Scholar
Feenstra, R. C., Inklaar, R. and Timmer, M. P. (2015), ‘The next generation of the Penn World Table’, American Economic Review, 105 (10): 3150–82.Google Scholar
Feld, L. P. and Voigt, S. (2003), ‘Economic growth and judicial independence: cross-country evidence using a new set of indicators’, European Journal of Political Economy, 19 (3): 497–527.Google Scholar
Freedom House (2000), Press Freedom Survey 2000, New York and Washington: Freedom House.Google Scholar
Garoupa, N. M. (2012), ‘The economics of prosecutors’, in Harel, A. and Hylton, K. (eds), Economics and Criminal Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 231–42.Google Scholar
Gilliéron, G. (2014), Public Prosecutors in the United States and Europe: A Comparative Analysis with Special Focus on Switzerland, France, and Germany, Cham et al.: Springer.Google Scholar
Gutmann, J. and Voigt, S. (2017), ‘Judicial independence in the EU: a puzzle’, ILE Working Paper Series, 4: 1–21.Google Scholar
Hayo, B. and Voigt, S. (2007), ‘Explaining de facto judicial independence’, International Review of Law and Economics, 27 (3): 269–90.Google Scholar
Jehle, J.-M. (2006), ‘The function of public prosecution within the criminal justice system’, in Jehle, J.-M. and Wade, M. (eds). Coping with Overloaded Criminal Justice Systems: The Rise of Prosecutorial Power Across Europe, Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 3–25.Google Scholar
Jehle, J.-M. and Wade, M. (2006), ‘Preface’, in Coping with Overloaded Criminal Justice Systems: The Rise of Prosecutorial Power Across Europe, Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, v–vi.Google Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A. (2008), ‘The economic consequences of legal origins’, Journal of Economic Literature, 46 (2): 285–332.Google Scholar
Luna, E. and Wade, M. (2012a), ‘Looking back and at the challenges ahead’, in The Prosecutor in Transnational Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 424–44.Google Scholar
Luna, E. and Wade, M. (2012b), ‘Preface’, in The Prosecutor in Transnational Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press, xi–xvii.Google Scholar
Luna, E. and Wade, M. (2012c), ‘The prosecutor as policy maker, case manager, and investigator. Introduction’, in The Prosecutor in Transnational Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–19.Google Scholar
Luna, E. and Wade, M. (2012d), The Prosecutor in Transnational Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, M. G., Gurr, T. R. and Jaggers, K. (2014), Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2013, Vienna (Virginia): Center for Systemic Peace.Google Scholar
Montalvo, J. G. and Reynal-Querol, M. (2005), ‘Ethnic diversity and economic development’, Journal of Development Economics, 76 (2): 293–323.Google Scholar
Myttenaere, R. (1998), The Immunities of Members of Parliament, Geneva: Inter-Parliamentary Union.Google Scholar
Norris, P. (2009), Democracy Timeseries Data Release 3.0, Cambridge: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Tonry, M. (2013a), ‘Prosecutors and politics in comparative perspective’, in Prosecutors and Politics. A Comparative Perspective, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1–33.Google Scholar
Tonry, M. (2013b), Prosecutors and Politics: A Comparative Perspective, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2004), The Seventh United Nations Survey on Crime Trends and the Operations of Criminal Justice Systems: Covering the Period 1998–2000, Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.Google Scholar
Van Aaken, A., Feld, L. P. and Voigt, S. (2010), ‘Do independent prosecutors deter political corruption? An empirical evaluation across 78 countries’, American Law and Economics Review, 12 (1): 204–44.Google Scholar
Van der Hulst, M. (2000), The Parliamentary Mandate. A Global Comparative Study, Geneva: Inter-Parliamentary Union.Google Scholar
Voigt, S., Gutmann, J. and Feld, L. P. (2015), ‘Economic growth and judicial independence, a dozen years on: cross-country evidence using an updated set of indicators’, European Journal of Political Economy, 38: 197–211.Google Scholar
Weigend, T. (2012), ‘A judge by another name? Comparative perspectives on the role of the public prosecutor’, in The Prosecutor in Transnational Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 377–91.Google Scholar