Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:09:55.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Labor-Industrial Conflict and the Collapse of Uruguayan Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Howard Handelman*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Extract

During the 1960s and early 1970s, the collapse of civilian democracies in several of Latin America's most socioeconomically developed nations and the rise of highly institutionalized, repressive regimes raised serious questions about the nature of political development and political decay in that region. Neither advanced social indicators (Argentina, Chile, Uruguay), nor an extensive, modern-industrial economic sector (Argentina, Brazil), nor a sustained period of representative government (Chile, Uruguay) seemed to be guarantees of continued civilian-democratic rule. Indeed, scholars such as Guillermo O'Donnell have suggested that the nature of economic growth and industrialization in Latin America—most notably in the “Southern Cone”— had resulted in increased class conflict, intense political strains, and the rise of bureaucratic-authoritarian (B-A) regimes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agee, P. (1975) Inside the Factory: CIA Diary. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Berenson, W. (1975) Group Politics in Uruguay: The Development, Political Activity and Effectiveness of Uruguayan Trade Associations. Ph.D. dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville.Google Scholar
Cárpena, E. (1970) “Clase social, ideología y opinión pública,” pp. 5574 in Cuadernos de Ciencias Sociales. Montevideo: Instituto de Estudios Sociales.Google Scholar
Collier, D. [ed.] (1979) The New Authoritarianism in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
D'Elia, G. (1969) El Movimiento Sindical. Montevideo: Nuestra Tierra.Google Scholar
Epstein, E. (1978) “Anti-inflationary policies in Argentina and Chile: or who pays the cost?’ Comparative Pol. Studies 11 (July): 211230.Google Scholar
Fitzgibbon, R. (1967) “Measuring democratic change in Latin America.” J. of Politics 29 (February): 129166.Google Scholar
Hamilton, R. (1967) Affluence and the French Worker in the Fourth Republic. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Handelman, H. (1981) “Economic policy and elite pressures in Uruguay,” in H. Handelman and T. Sanders (eds.) Military Governments and the Movement Toward Democracy in South America. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Instituto de Economía (1969) El Proceso Económico del Uruguay. Montevideo: Universidad de la República.Google Scholar
Kaufman, R. (1979) “Industrial change and authoritarian rule in Latin America,” pp. 165254 in D. Collier (ed.) The New Authoritarianism in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. (1975) “On the viability of small countries: Uruguay and New Zealand compared.” J. of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 17 (August): 259280.Google Scholar
Macadar, L., Reig, N., and Santias, J. E. (1971) “Una economía Latinoamericana,” pp. 35142 in Uruguay Hoy. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Malloy, J. [ed.] (1977) Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America. Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, R. (1975) “The rise of military politics in Uruguay.” Inter-American Economic Affairs 29 (Spring): 2543.Google Scholar
McDonald, R. (1972) “Electoral politics and Uruguayan political decay.” Inter-American Economic Affairs 26 (Summer): 2545.Google Scholar
Nun, J. (1967) “The middle class military coup,” pp. 66118 in C. Veliz (ed.) The Politics of Conformity in Latin America. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, G. (1978) “Reflections on the patterns of change in the bureaucratic-authoritarian state.” Latin America Research Rev. 12 (Winter): 338.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, G. (1973) Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley: University of California, Institute of International Studies.Google Scholar
Rama, C. (1960) Las Clases Sociales en el Uruguay. Montevideo: Neutro Tiempo.Google Scholar
Solari, A. (1966) Uruguay en Cifras. Montevideo: Universidad de la República.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. (1962) Government and Politics of Uruguay. New Orleans LA: Tulane Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Weinstein, M. (1975) Uruguay: The Politics of Failure. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar