Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-s7zp8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-10T04:24:38.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Worlds of last-resort safety nets? A proposed typology of minimum income schemes in Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2020

Marcello Natili
Marcello Natili*
Affiliation:
Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
*
CONTACTMarcello Natili marcello.natili@unimi.itDepartment of Social and Political Sciences, University of Milan, Via Conservatorio 7, 20122Milan, Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over the past twenty years, minimum income schemes (MIS) have undergone major transformations in their functions and role. From mainly residual instruments that aimed to guarantee minimum income support and to prevent extreme marginality, in most countries they now have an ambiguous function of providing income support and favouring social and labour market inclusion. Against this background, this article provides an analytical grid that allows describing the different features of last-resort safety nets across Europe, building on the definition of key main dimensions of variation of MISs in Europe – generosity, eligibility and conditionality requirements, institutional configuration, active inclusion profiles. Then, it introduces a new typology of MIS in Europe, building on a new dataset with data on expenditures and coverage collected from National Statistical Offices.

Keywords

Minimum income schemespovertyactivationwelfare regimes

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , March 2020 , pp. 57 - 75
Copyright
© 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

References

Alber, J. (1981). Government responses to the challenge of unemployment: The development of unemployment insurance in Western Europe. In Flora, P. & Heidenheimer, A. J. (Eds.), Development of welfare states in Europe and America (pp. 151–183). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Angelin, A., Johansson, H., Koch, M., & Panican, A. (2013). National report: Sweden, Deliverable D5.5, project combating poverty in Europe: Reorganising active inclusion through participatory and integrated modes of multilevel governance.Google Scholar
Bahle, T., Hubl, V., & Pfeifer, M. (2011). The last safety net. A handbook of minimum income protection in Europe. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Barbier, J.-C., & Ludwig-Mayerhofer, W. (2004). The many worlds of activation. European Societies, 6(4), 423–436. doi: 10.1080/1461669042000275845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2011). Active labour market policy in a changing economic context. In Clasen, J. & Clegg, D. (Eds.), Regulating the risk of unemployment: National adaptations to post-industrial labour markets in Europe (pp. 317–332). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clasen, J., & Clegg, D. (Eds.). (2011). Regulating the risk of unemployment: National Adaptations to post-industrial labour markets in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, D. (2013). Dynamics and varieties of active inclusion: A five country comparison. Deliverable D5.6, Project Combating Poverty in Europe: Reorganising Active Inclusion through Participatory and Integrated Modes of Multilevel Governance.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three words of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Eurofound. (2015). Access to social benefits: Reducing non-take-up. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Ferrera, M. (2000). Targeting welfare in a soft state: Italys winding road to selectivity. In Gilbert, N. (Ed.), Targeting social benefits: International perspective and trends (pp. 157–186). New Brunswick: Transactions.Google Scholar
Ferrera, M. (2005). The boundaries of welfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrera, M., Hemericjck, A., & Rhodes, M. (2000). The future of the European welfare state: Managing diversity for a prosperous and cohesive Europe. Report for the Portuguese Presidency of the European Union, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Ferrera, M., & Jessoula, M. (2016). Poverty and social exclusion as emerging policy arenas in the EU. In Halvorsen, R. & Hvinden, B. (Eds.), Combating poverty in Europe. Active inclusion in a multi-level and multi-actor context. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Figari, F., Matsaganis, M., & Sutherland, H. (2013). Are European social safety nets tight enough? Coverage and adequacy of minimum income schemes in 14 EU countries. International Journal of Social Welfare, 22, 3–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2012.00885.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleckenstein, T. (2008). Restructuring welfare for the unemployed: The Hartz legislation in Germany. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(2), 177–188. doi: 10.1177/0958928707087593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, H., & Marlier, E. (2016). Minimum income schemes. A study of national policies. European Social Policy Network, European Commission.Google Scholar
Gough, I. (2001). Social assistance regimes: A cluster analysis. Journal of European Social Policy, 11(2), 165–170. doi: 10.1177/095892870101100205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, I., Eardley, T., Bradshaw, J., Ditch, J., & Whiteford, P. (1997). Social assistance in OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 7(1), 17–43. doi: 10.1177/095892879700700102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granaglia, E., & Bolzoni, M. (2016). Il reddito di base. Roma: Ediesse.Google Scholar
Guibentif, P., & Bouget, D. (1997). As Polticas Rendimento Mnimo na Unio Europeia. Lisboa: Unio das Mutualidades Portuguesas.Google Scholar
Hemerijk, A. (2012). Changing welfare states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hlsch, K., & Kraus, M. (2004). Poverty alleviation and the degree of centralization in European schemes of social assistance. Journal of European Social Policy, 14(2), 143–164. doi: 10.1177/0958928704042007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immervoll, H. (2010). Minimum income benefits in OECD countries: Policy design, effectiveness and challenges. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 100, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Kazepov, Y. (Ed.). (2010). Rescaling social policies: Towards multilevel governance in Europe. European Centre Vienna: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Kazepov, Y., & Barberis, E. (2012). Social assistance governance in Europe: Towards a multilevel perspective. In Marx, I. & Nelson, K. (Eds.), Minimum income protection in Flux (pp. 217–248). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lodemel, I., & Moreira, A. (2014). Activation or workfare? Governance and the neo-liberal convergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ldemel, I., & Schulte, B. (1992). Social assistance: A part of social security or the poor law in new disguise? Brussels: European Institute of Social Security.Google Scholar
Ldemel, I., & Trickey, H. (Eds.). (2001). An offer you cant refuse: Workfare in international perspective. Bristol: The Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madama, I. (2015). The welfare state and redistribution. Remarks on the policy and politics of the Robin Hood Principle at Work. in Riva, N., Madama, I., Bistagnino, G. The Politics of Redistribution. An Interdisciplinary Dialogue on the Foundations of the Welfare State LPF Working Paper 4/2015, Centro Einaudi, Torino.Google Scholar
Marchal, S., Marx, I., & Van Mechelen, N. (2014). The great wake-up call? Social citizenship and minimum income provisions in Europe in times of crisis. Journal of Social Policy, 43(2), 247–267. doi: 10.1017/S0047279413000950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchal, S., & Van Mechelen, N. (2017). A new kid in town? Active inclusion elements in European minimum income schemes. Social Policy & Administration, 51, 171–194. doi: 10.1111/spol.12177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, I. (2007). A new social question? On minimum income protection in the post-industrial era. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Marx, I., & Nelson, K. (Eds.). (2012). Minimum income protection in Flux. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Matsaganis, M., Paulus, A., & Sutherland, H. (2008). The take up of social benefits. Institute for Social and Economic Research, Research Note 6/2008.Google Scholar
Minas, R., & Overbye, E. (2010). The territorial organization of European social assistance schemes. In Kazepov, Y. (Ed.), Rescaling social policies: Towards multilevel governance in Europe (pp. 203–241). Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Moreira, A. (2008). The activation dilemma. Reconciling the fairness and effectiveness of minimum income schemes in Europe. Bristol: The Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natili, M. (2016). The unexpected institutionalization of a minimum income in Spain. LPF Working Paper 2/2016, Centro Einaudi, Torino.Google Scholar
Natili, M. (2019). The politics of minimum income. Explaining path departure and policy reversal in the age of austerity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natili, M., Jessoula, M., Madama, I., & Matsaganis, M. (2018). The right(s) and minimum income in hard times: Southern and Eastern Europe compared. European Societies. Published online: 11 Jul 2018.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (2013). Social assistance and EU poverty thresholds 1990–2008. Are European welfare systems providing just and fair protection against low income? European Sociological Review, 29(2), 386–401. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcr080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petzold, N. (2013). National report: Germany. Deliverable D5.1, Combating Poverty in Europe: Re-organising Active Inclusion through Participatory and Integrated Participatory and Integrated Modes of Multilevel Governance.Google Scholar
Picot, G. (2012). Politics of Segmentation: Party competition and social protection in Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rat, C. (2009). The impact of minimum income guarantee schemes in Central and Eastern Europe. In Cerami, A. & Vanhuysse, P. (Eds.), Post-communist welfare pathways. Theorizing social policy transformations in central and Eastern Europe (pp. 164–180). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosanvallon, P. (1995). La Nouvelle Question Sociale: Repenser lEtat Providence. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Sacchi, S. (2013). Le esperienze europee di contrasto alla povert. Che cosa possiamo imparare? Unpublished Paper.Google Scholar
Schmid, G., & Reissert, B. (1996). Unemployment compensation and labour market transitions. In Schmid, G. (Ed.), International handbook of labour market policy and evaluation (pp. 235–276). Cheltenham and Brookfield: Edwar Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Mechelen, N., & Marchal, S. (2012). Struggle for life: Social assistance benefits, 1992–2009. In Marx, I. & Nelson, K. (Eds.), Minimum income protection in Flux (pp. 28–54). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Vesan, P. (2012). Le politiche del lavoro. In Ferrera, M. (Ed.), Le politiche sociali (pp. 124–184). Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Weishaupt, J. T. (2012). Origin and genesis of activation policies in OldEurope: Towards a balanced approach? In Marx, I. & Nelson, K. (Eds.), Minimum income protection in Flux (pp. 190–216). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar