Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-17T07:14:02.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bones of contention. The supply of temporal bones for dissection: the legalities, problems and solutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

D. P. Morris ,
D. A. Luff ,
S. P. Hargreaves  and
M. P. Rothera
D. P. Morris*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Hope Hospital, Salford and The Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Pendlebury, UK.
D. A. Luff
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Hope Hospital, Salford and The Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Pendlebury, UK.
S. P. Hargreaves
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Hope Hospital, Salford and The Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Pendlebury, UK.
M. P. Rothera
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Hope Hospital, Salford and The Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Pendlebury, UK.
*
Address for correspondence: David P. Morris, B.Sc. F.R.C.S.(Eng) F.R.C.S.(Oto) 108 Westbourne Avenue South, Burnley, Lancashire BB11 4QZ. Fax: 0161 787 4723
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Temporal bone dissection is considered to be an important aspect of the otological training of the Specialist Registrar with dissection skills being formally assessed in the Intercollegiate Fellowship Examination. However the procurement of cadaveric specimens suitable for dissection may be fraught with difficulties. The authors take an historical perspective to clarify the existing legal issues and outline the means available to improve supply.

Keywords

Temporal boneDissectionTraining, support
Type
Review Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 112 , Issue 12 , December 1998 , pp. 1138 - 1141
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alusi, G. H., Tan, A. C., Campos, J. C., Linney, A., Wright, A. (1997) Tele-education: the virtual medical laboratory. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 3(Suppl.1): 79–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dale, B. (1998) Intercollegiate Board in Otolaryngology: Memo from the outgoing chairman. British Association of Otolaryngologists – Head and Neck Surgeons (BAO) Newsletter 98/1.Google Scholar
French, R. (1993) The anatomical tradition. In Companion Encyclopaedia of the History of Medicine, 1st Edition vol. 1. (Bynum, W. F., Porter, R., eds.), Routledge, London, pp 81–101.Google Scholar
Golding-Wood, D. G. (1994) Temporal bone dissection for display. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 108: 3–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeannon, J.-P. (1996) Temporal bones for dissection. A diminishing asset? Journal of Laryngology and Otology 110: 219–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, R. A., Guduri, S., Crawford, R. H. (1994) Preliminary experience with selective laser sintering models of the human temporal bone. American Journal of Neuroradiology 15(3): 473–477.Google ScholarPubMed
Lindsey, L. A., Hopper, I. (1993) Temporal bone dissection using a low cost miniature electric drill. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 107: 721–722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkland, P. M., Tostevin, P. (1997) A new alternative to the operating microscope in the temporal bone laboratory. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 111: 958–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Anatomy Act (1984) HMSO.Google Scholar
The Anatomy Regulations (1988) HMSO.Google Scholar
The Coroner's Act, Section 8 (1988) HMSO.Google Scholar
The Human Tissues Act (1961) HMSO.Google Scholar
Personal Communication with the Honorary Secretary of BAO-HNS (1998).Google Scholar
Personal Communication with H.M. Inspector of Anatomy (1998).Google Scholar