Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T12:50:28.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Computer or not? Use of image guidance during endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis at St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, and meta-analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2013

V S Sunkaraneni ,
D Yeh ,
H Qian  and
A R Javer
V S Sunkaraneni*
Affiliation:
St Paul's Sinus Centre, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
D Yeh
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
H Qian
Affiliation:
Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
A R Javer
Affiliation:
St Paul's Sinus Centre, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
*
Address for correspondence: Mr V S Sunkaraneni, Consultant Rhinologist/Skullbase Surgeon, ENT Department, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Rd, Guildford GU2 7XX, UK E-mail: drsan911@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

The advantages and limitations of image guidance systems for endoscopic sinus surgery are unclear. We report our experience and present a meta-analysis of the evidence.

Methods:

We performed a retrospective analysis of endoscopic sinus surgery procedures performed with versus without image guidance. A total of 355 cases was included. Primary outcomes included complication rates and time to revision surgery. A literature search was conducted to enable identification and analysis of studies of similar comparisons.

Results:

Within 1.5 years of the index sinus surgical procedure, the risk of revision surgery was significantly higher for patients treated with non-assisted versus computer-assisted endoscopic sinus surgery (p = 0.001). Meta-analysis did not indicate a reduction in complications or revision surgery procedures with the use of image guidance systems, although the majority of included studies showed a non-significant reduction in revision surgery.

Conclusion:

Our study offers some evidence that computer-assisted endoscopic sinus surgery may delay residual disease and reduce the requirement for revision surgery. Although this finding was not borne out in the meta-analysis, the majority of identified studies demonstrated a trend towards fewer revision procedures after computer-assisted endoscopic sinus surgery. This type of surgery may offer other advantages that are not easily measurable.

Keywords

EndoscopySinusitisTechnologyReviewSystematicComplications
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 127 , Issue 4 , April 2013 , pp. 368 - 377
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented at the Combined Otolaryngological Spring Meeting 2011, 27 April to 1 May 1 2011, Chicago, Illinois, USA

References

1Anon, JB, Klimek, L, Mosges, R, Zinreich, SJ. Computer-assisted endoscopic sinus surgery. An international review. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1997;30:389–401CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Govindaraj, S, Adappa, ND, Kennedy, DW. Endoscopic sinus surgery: evolution and technical innovations. J Laryngol Otol 2010;124:242–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Anon, JB. Computer-aided endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 1998;108:949–61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Labadie, RF, Davis, BM, Fitzpatrick, JM. Image-guided surgery: what is the accuracy? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;13:27–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Casiano, RR, Numa, WA Jr.Efficacy of computed tomographic image-guided endoscopic sinus surgery in residency training programs. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1277–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Mueller, SA, Caversaccio, M. Outcome of computer-assisted surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. J Laryngol Otol 2010;124:500–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Tabaee, A, Hsu, AK, Shrime, MG, Rickert, S, Close, LG. Quality of life and complications following image-guided endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;135:76–80Google ScholarPubMed
8Fried, MP, Moharir, VM, Shin, J, Taylor-Becker, M, Morrison, P. Comparison of endoscopic sinus surgery with and without image guidance. Am J Rhinol 2002;16:193–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Kherani, S, Javer, AR, Woodham, JD, Stevens, HE. Choosing a computer-assisted surgical system for sinus surgery. J Otolaryngol 2003;32:190–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Sunkaraneni, VS, Nair, SB. Complications of endoscopic sinus surgery and their management. The Otorhinolarygologist 2010;3:48–51Google Scholar
11Sweeting, MJ, Sutton, AJ, Lambert, PC. What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data. Stat Med 2004;23:1351–75CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Diamond, GA, Bax, L, Kaul, S. Uncertain effects of rosiglitazone on the risk for myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:585–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Higgins, JPT, Thompson, SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002;21:1539–58CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Al-Swiahb, JN, Al-Dousary, SH. Computer-aided endoscopic sinus surgery: a retrospective comparative study. Ann Saudi Med 2010;30:149–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Eliashar, R, Sichel, JY, Gross, M, Hocwald, E, Dano, I, Biron, A et al. Image guided navigation system – a new technology for complex endoscopic endonasal surgery. Postgrad Med J 2003;79:686–90CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Reardon, EJ. Navigational risks associated with sinus surgery and the clinical effects of implementing a navigational system for sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 2002;112:1–19CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Tschopp, KP, Thomaser, EG. Outcome of functional endonasal sinus surgery with and without CT-navigation. Rhinology 2008;46:116–20Google ScholarPubMed
18Lee, JM, Chiu, AG. Role of maximal endoscopic sinus surgery techniques in chronic rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2010;43:579–89, ixCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Stankiewicz, JA. Complications of endoscopic intranasal ethmoidectomy. Laryngoscope 1987;97:1270–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20May, M, Levine, HL, Mester, SJ, Schaitkin, B. Complications of endoscopic sinus surgery: analysis of 2108 patients – incidence and prevention. Laryngoscope 1994;104:1080–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. Intra-Operative Use of Computer Aided Surgery – Update. In: http://www.entnet.org/Practice/policyIntraOperativeSurgery.cfm. [2 March 2011]Google Scholar
22Orlandi, RR, Petersen, E. Image guidance: a survey of attitudes and use. Am J Rhinol 2006;20:406–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Musy, PY, Kountakis, SE. Anatomic findings in patients undergoing revision endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 2004;25:418–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Thong, JF, Lee, J, Yeak, S, Siow, JK. Use of image guidance in endoscopic sinus surgery. Clin Otolaryngol 2007;32:500CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Philpott, CM, Dharamsi, A, Witheford, M, Javer, AR. Endoscopic management of inverted papillomas: long-term results – the St. Paul's Sinus Centre experience. Rhinology 2010;48:358–63Google ScholarPubMed
26King, JM, Caldarelli, DD, Pigato, JB. A review of revision functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 1994;104:404–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Hepworth, EJ, Bucknor, M, Patel, A, Vaughan, WC. Nationwide survey on the use of image-guided functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;135:68–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Metson, RB, Cosenza, MJ, Cunningham, MJ, Randolph, GW. Physician experience with an optical image guidance system for sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 2000;110:972–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Zuckerman, JD, Wise, SK, Rogers, GA, Senior, BA, Schlosser, RJ, DelGaudio, JM. The utility of cadaver dissection in endoscopic sinus surgery training courses. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2009;23:218–24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Gibbons, MD, Gunn, CG, Niwas, S, Sillers, MJ. Cost analysis of computer-aided endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol 2001;15:71–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Smith, TL, Stewart, MG, Orlandi, RR, Setzen, M, Lanza, DC. Indications for image-guided sinus surgery: the current evidence. Am J Rhinol 2007;21:80–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Javer, AR, Genoway, KA. Patient quality of life improvements with and without computer assistance in sinus surgery: outcomes study. J Otolaryngol 2006;35:373–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Anon, JB, Lipman, SP, Oppenheim, D, Halt, RA. Computer-assisted endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 1994;104:901–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed