Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:19:04.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Low frequency electromagnetic radiation and hearing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2009

J Morales ,
M Garcia ,
C Perez ,
J V Valverde ,
C Lopez-Sanchez ,
V Garcia-Martinez  and
J L Quesada
J Morales*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
M Garcia
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics, Electric and Automatic Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
C Perez
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
J V Valverde
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics, Electric and Automatic Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
C Lopez-Sanchez
Affiliation:
Department of Human Anatomy and Embryology, School of Medicine, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
V Garcia-Martinez
Affiliation:
Department of Human Anatomy and Embryology, School of Medicine, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
J L Quesada
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Spain
*
Address for correspondence: Prof J Morales, Dept Otorrinolaringologia, Facultad de Medicina, PO Box 108, 06080 Badajoz, Spain. Fax: 34 924 276350 E-mail: jmorales@unex.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To analyse the possible impact of low and extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on the outer hairs cells of the organ of Corti, in a guinea pig model.

Materials and methods:

Electromagnetic fields of 50, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000 and 5000 Hz frequencies and 1.5 µT intensity were generated using a transverse electromagnetic wave guide. Guinea pigs of both sexes, weighing 100–150 g, were used, with no abnormalities on general and otic examination. Total exposure times were: 360 hours for 50, 500 and 1000 Hz; 3300 hours for 2000 Hz; 4820 hours for 4000 Hz; and 6420 hours for 5000 Hz. One control animal was used in each frequency group. The parameters measured by electric response audiometer included: hearing level; waves I–IV latencies; wave I–III interpeak latency; and percentage appearance of waves I–III at 90 and 50 dB sound pressure level intensity.

Results:

Values for the above parameters did not differ significantly, comparing the control animal and the rest of each group. In addition, no significant differences were found between our findings and those of previous studies of normal guinea pigs.

Conclusion:

Prolonged exposure to electromagnetic fields of 50 Hz to 5 KHz frequencies and 1.5 µT intensity, produced no functional or morphological alteration in the outer hair cells of the guinea pig organ of Corti.

Keywords

Inner EarCochleaElectromagnetic RadiationGuinea Pig
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 123 , Issue 11 , November 2009 , pp. 1204 - 1211
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Saravi, FD.Mobile phones and human health [in Spanish]. Revista Medica Universitaria 2007;3:1–41Google Scholar
2Ozturan, O, Erdem, T, Miman, MC, Kalcioglu, MT, Oncel, S.Effects of the electromagnetic field of telephones on hearing. Acta Otolaryngol 2002;122:289–93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Parazzini, M, Bell, S, Thuroczy, G, Molnar, F, Tognola, G, Lutman, ME et al. Influence of the mechanisms of generation of distortion product otoacoustic emission of mobile phone exposure. Hear Res 2005;208:68–78CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Paglialonga, A, Tognola, G, Parazzini, M, Lutman, ME, Bell, SL, Thuroczy, G et al. Effects of mobile phone exposure on time frequency fine structure of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 2007;122:2174–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Aran, JM, Carrere, N, Chalan, Y, Dulou, PE, Larrieu, S, Letenneur, L et al. Effects of exposure of the ear to GSA microwaves: in vivo and in vitro experimental studies. J Audiol 2004;43:545–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Simkó, M, Mattsson, MO.Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields as effectors of cellular responses in vitro: possible immune cell activation. J Cell Biochem 2004;93:83–92CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Wolf, FI, Torsello, A, Tedesco, B, Fasanella, S, Boninsegna, A, D'Ascenzo, M et al. 50-Hz extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields enhance cell proliferation and DNA damage: possible involvement of a redox mechanism. Biochim Biophys Acta 2005;1743:120–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Frahm, J, Lantow, M, Lupke, M, Weiss, DG, Simkó, M.Alteration in cellular functions in mouse macrophages after exposure to 50 Hz magnetic fields. J Cell Biochem 2006;99:186–77CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Le Prell, CG, Kawamoto, K, Raphael, Y, Dolan, DF.Electromotile hearing: acoustic tones mask psychophysical response to high-frequency electrical stimulation of intact guinea pig cochleae. J Acoust Soc Am 2006;120:3889–900CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Dong, XX, Ospeck, M, Iwasa, KH.Piezoelectric reciprocal relationship of the membrane motor in the cochlear outer hair cell. Biophys J 2002;82:1254–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Békésy, GV.Experiments in Hearing. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960;173, 481, 673Google Scholar
12Russell, IJ, Sellick, PM.Tuning properties of cochlear hair cells. Nature 1977;267:858–60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Kemp, DT.Stimulated acoustic emissions from the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Amer 1978;64:1386–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Spoendlin, HH, Gacek, RR.Electron microscopic study of the efferent and afferent innervation organ of Corti in the cat. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1963;72:660–86CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Engström, H.On the double innervation of the inner ear sensory epithelia. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1958;49:109–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Rama, J, Morales, J, Sanchez, G.Comparative study of the nerve endings of the outer and inner hair cells in the organ of Corti. J Laryngol Otol 1980;94:1125–43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Cooper, NP, Guinan, JJ Jr.Efferent-mediated control of basilar membrane motion. Physiol 2006;576:49–54CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Brownell, WE, Bader, CR, Bertrand, D, de Ribaupierre, Y.Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells. Science 1985;227:194–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Mammano, F, Ashmore, JF.Differential expression of outer hair cell potassium currents in the isolated cochlea of the guinea pig. J Physiol 1996;496:639–46CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Gale, JE, Ashmore, JF.The outer hair cell motor in membrane patches. Pflugers Arch 1997;434:267–71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Gartzke, J, Lange, K.Cellular target of weak magnetic fields: ionic conduction along actin filaments of microvilli. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2002;283:1333–46CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Ospeck, M, Dong, XX, Iwasa, KH.Limiting frequency of the cochlear amplifier based on electromotility of outer hair cells. Biophys J 2003;84:739–49CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Zhang, M, Kalinec, GM, Urrutia, R, Billadeau, DD, Kalinecm, F.ROCK-dependent and ROCK-independent control of cochlear outer hair cell electromotility. J Biol Chem 2003;278:35644–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Rabbitt, RD, Ayliffe, HE, Christensen, D, Pamarthy, K, Durney, C, Clifford, S et al. Evidence of piezoelectric resonance in isolated outer hair cells. Biophys J 2005;88:2257–65CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Frolenkov, GI.Regulation of electromotility in the cochlear outer hair cell. J Physiol 2006;576:43–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Ospeck, M, Dong, XX, Fang, J, Iwasa, KH.Electromotility in outer hair cells: a supporting role for fast potassium conductance. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2006;68:373–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Liao, Z, Feng, S, Popel, AS, Brownell, WE, Spector, AA.Outer hair cell active force generation in the cochlear environment. J Acoust Soc Am 2007;122:2215–25CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed