Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T21:11:06.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Qualitative evaluation of paediatric surgical otolaryngology content on YouTube

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2020

B Ward
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
R Bavier
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
C Warren
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
J Yan
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
B Paskhover*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Boris Paskhover, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 140 Bergen Street, Suite 8100, Newark, NJ07103, USA E-mail: borpas@njms.rutgers.edu Fax: +1 (973) 972 8567

Abstract

Objective

This study evaluated the quality of YouTube content focusing on common paediatric otolaryngology procedures, as this content can influence the opinions and medical decisions of patients.

Methods

A total of 120 YouTube videos were compiled to review using the terms ‘adenoid removal’, ‘adenoidectomy’, ‘ear tubes’, ‘tympanostomy’, ‘tonsil removal’ and ‘tonsillectomy’. The Discern criteria was used to rate the quality of health information presented in each video.

Results

The mean bias Discern score was 3.18 and the mean overall Discern score was 2.39. Videos including US board certified physicians were rated significantly higher (p < 0.001) than videos without (bias Discern score = 3.00 vs 2.38; overall Discern score = 3.79 vs 1.55). The videos had been viewed a total of 176 769 549 times.

Conclusion

Unbiased, high quality videos on YouTube are lacking. As patients may rely on this information when making medical decisions, it is important that practitioners continually evaluate and improve this video content. Otolaryngologists should be prepared to discuss YouTube content with patients.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dr B Paskhover takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Gualtieri, LN. The doctor as the second opinion and the internet as the first. In: CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Boston: ACM, 2009;2489–98Google Scholar
Lu, X, Zhang, R, Wu, W, Shang, X, Liu, M. Relationship between internet health information and patient compliance based on trust: empirical study. J Med Internet Res 2018;20:e253CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madathil, KC, Rivera-Rodriguez, AJ, Greenstein, JS, Gramopadhye, AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: a systematic review. Health Informatics J 2015;21:173–94CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strychowsky, JE, Nayan, S, Farrokhyar, F, MacLean, J. YouTube: a good source of information on pediatric tonsillectomy? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2013;77:972–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCool, ME, Wahl, J, Schlecht, I, Apfelbacher, C. Evaluating written patient information for eczema in German: comparing the reliability of two instruments, DISCERN and EQIP. PLoS One 2015;10:e0139895CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charnock, D. The DISCERN Handbook: Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information on Treatment Choices. Abingdon: Madcliffe Medical Press, 1998Google Scholar
Omnicore Agency. YouTube by the Numbers: Stats, Demographics & Fun Facts. In: https://www.omnicoreagency.com/youtube-statistics/ [6 January 2019]Google Scholar