Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T14:17:49.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Peruvian Government and the Nitrate Trade, 1873–1879

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Robert G. Greenhill  and
Rory M. Miller
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The 1870s were a decade of crisis and change in the Peruvian economy. Guano, the bulk of Peru's exports, no longer dominated the republic's trade and finance as it had for thirty years. Quantity, quality and markets persistently declined from the peaks of the 1850s and 1860s. Two new growth sectors, however, increasingly diversified Peru's commercial pattern. On plantations in the north sugar production quadrupled between 1873 and 1876, overhauling cotton and wool among exports. At the same time, in the southernmost province of Tarapacá nitrate extraction and manufacture steadily increased.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Latin American Studies , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , May 1973 , pp. 107 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Mathew, W. M, ‘Peru and the British Guano Market, 1840–1870’, Economic History Review, second ser., 23 (1970), 112–28.Google Scholar

2 Memorandum, 27 Feb. 1877, Antony Gibbs & Sons Papers, Guildhall, London (cited hereafter as Gibbs MS) 11, 120; Hayne, to Henry, , 1 03 1877,Google ScholarIbid., 11,120. James Hayne and James Henry were managing partners in the vest coast offices of Antony Gibbs & Sons. Others were Thomas Comber, Alfred Bohi, Bruce Miller and Henry Read. See Maude, C. W, Antony Gibbs & Sons Limited: Merchants and Bankers 1808–1958 (1958), pp.127–31.Google Scholar

3 El Comercio, 2 08. 1872.

4 Jerningham, to Granville, , 27 05 and 27 09. 1872, Public Record Oflice, London, Foreign Office Archives, Peru (cited hereafter as F.O. 61), vol. 272.Google Scholar

5 For an explanation of the guano consignment scheme, see Mathew, W. M, ‘Anglo-Peruvian Commercial and Financial Relations 1820–1865’, unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of London (1964), pp. 258–9.Google Scholar

6 Clarke, W, Peru and Its Creditors (1877), pp. 13–20;Google ScholarCharles, A. MacQueen, Peruvian Public Finance, Trade Promotion Series no. 30 (Washington, 1926), p.87.Google Scholar

7 Watt, Stewart, Henry Meiggs—Yankee Pizarro (New York, 1946), pp. 41–84.Google Scholar

8 Duffield, A. J, Peru in the Guano Age (London, 1877), pp. 53 and 105.Google Scholar

9 St, John to Derby, 27 05 1875, F.O. 61/289.Google Scholar

10 Consular Reports (Islay), Parliamentary Papers (cited hereafter as P.P.) (1875), LXXV, 748 and (Peru) (P.P. 1878), LXXII, 530–62.

11 MacQueen, , op. cit., pp. 7, 39 and 87;Google ScholarDiario tie Debates, Cámara tie Diputados (Lima) (cited hereafter as Debates) (1872), 11, 67–72.

12 MacQueen, , op. cit., p. 39;Google ScholarDebates (1872), 11, loc. cit.; Levin, J. V, The Export Economics: Their Pattern of Development in Historical Perspective (Cambridge, Mass., 1960), pp. 98–105.Google Scholar

13 Foreign Relations of the United States 1873 (Peru), p. 745, Thomas, to Fish, , 21 10. 1872;Google Scholarcf, Jerningham to Granville, , 27 09. and 27 10. 1872, F.O. 65/272.Google Scholar

14 Mathew, W. M, ‘The First Anglo-Peruvian Debt and Its Settlement, 1822–49’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 11 (1970), 86.Google Scholar

15 The South Pacific Times (cited hereafter as SPT), 15 05 1875, recorded 415 nitrate works capitalized at £3 million.

16 Henry, to Hayne, , 8 01. and 1 02. 1873, Gibbs MS 11,120;Google Scholar Memorandum, 01. 1873, Ibid., 11,132; Reports of the Tarapacá Nitrate Company, 1875–81, Ibid., 11,129; The Times, 26 09. 1873, 4-a; Duffield, op. cit., pp. 111–14.

17 Pardo's Message to Congress, 08. 1872, Debates, vol. 11; see also Oscar, Bermúdez, Historia del Salitre (Santiago, 1963), pp. 321–2.Google Scholar

18 Pardo's Message to Congress, 21 09. 1872, Debates, vol. 11 El Comercio, 2110. 1872.

19 Mathew, , ‘ British Guano Market ’, pp. 119–23.Google Scholar

20 Reports furnished to the Board of Admiralty and communicated to the Foreign Office, relative to the Guano Deposits of Peru, Stanley to Secretary to the Admiralty, 16 01. 1874 (P.P. 1874), LXVIII, Consular Reports (Callao) (P.P. 1872), LXVII, 272–206 and (1873), LXIV, 515–38; Duffield, op. cit., pp. 73–100.

21 Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society (cited hereafter as lRAS), V (1869), 130–6; VI (1870), 140–9; vii (1871), 284–8; VIII (1872), 225–23 and xvi, (1880), 311–21; Farmers Magazine (cited hereafter as FM), LXX (1875), 443 LXXII (1877), 422 and LXXVI (1879), 282.

22 London to Lima, 1 03 1876, Gibbs MS 11,471/-2; cf, Bohl to Hayne, 29 11. 1876,Google ScholarIbid., 11,121.

23 El Comercio, 22 09., 21 and 22 10. 1872.

24 El Comercio, 21 01. 1873; The Times, 1 02. 1873, 6-a; Jerningham, to Granville, 26 11. 1872 and 26 05 1873, F.O. 61/277;Google ScholarHenry, to Hayne, 3–4, 11, 18 and 24–2501. 1873, Gibbs MS 11,121;Google ScholarBermùdez, , op. cit., pp. 322–3.Google Scholar

25 SPT, 15 05 1875.

26 Berrill, K., ‘International Trade and the Rate of Economic Growth’, Economic History Review, second ser., 12 (1959–1960), 355–7.Google Scholar

27 El Comercio, 18 10. 1873.

28 Hayne to Henry, 1 02. 1873, Gibbs MS 11,120; Henry, Hayne, 21 02. 1873,Google ScholarIbid., 11,121; MacLean, to Derby, 26 10. 1874, F.O. 61/285;Google ScholarMoney, Market Review, 19 04 1873;Google ScholarBermùdez, , op. cit., p. 325.Google Scholar

29 Read, to Henry, 28 10., 24 and 26 11. 1873,Google ScholarRead, to Bohl, 28 08. and 32 12. 1873, Gibbs MS 11,123.Google Scholar

30 Minister, of Finance's Speech, 28 03 1873, Debates, vol. iv.Google Scholar

31 El Comercio, 16 07 1873.

32 Read, to Henry, 15 06 1873, Gibbs MS 11,123.Google Scholar

33 Manuel, Cruchaga, Guano y Salitre (Madrid, 1929), p. 173;Google ScholarAlcàzar, C. Camprubi, Historia de los Bancos en el Perù 1860−79 (Lima, 1957), p. 109.Google Scholar

34 Graham, to Derby, 23 07 1877, F.O. 61/300.Google Scholar

35 Consular Reports (Arica) (P.P. 1876), LXXVI, 182–201, and (Callao) (P.P. 1877), Lxxxiii, 682–94.

36 Foreign Relations of the United States 1875 (Peru), p. 1000, Thomas to Fish, 16 02. 1875.

37 JRAS, IV (1868), 334–8; V (1869), 73; VI (1870), 299–322; VII (1871), 365–88; IX (1873), 258; XIV (1877), 246–55, and xv (1878), 346–53; FM, LXIX (1875), 337, and LXX (1875), 459; Mathew, , British, Guano Market, pp. 327–4.Google Scholar

38 SPT, 14 11. 1874, 12 03 and 14 04 1875.

39 El Comercio, 20 05 1875.

40 El Comercio, 16–27 04 1875.

41 El Comercio, 17 03 and 10 05 1875.

42 El Comercio, 16 06 1876.

43 El Comercio, 13 05 1875.

44 El Comcrcio, 28 and 29 05 1875; The Times, 28 06 1875, 7e and 9a; SPT, 12 03, 4 and 22 04, 1 and 3 06 1875 and 22 07 1876; St, John to Derby, 10 06 1875, F.O. 61/289.Google Scholar

45 El Comercio, 2 08. and 11 09. 1875; MacQueen, , op. cit., pp. 8, 95–6.Google Scholar

46 Bermúdez, , op. cit., pp. 333–6 and 340.Google Scholar

47 Levin, , op. cit., pp. 55–7 and 65–8.Google Scholar

48 Henry, to Hayne, 3–401. 1873,Google ScholarLima, to Valparaiso, 18 10. 1876, Gibbs MS 11,121;Google ScholarRimac, Nitrate Company Agreement, 3 01. 1873,Google ScholarIbid., 11,130.

49 London, to Valparaiso, 1 02. 1876, Gibbs MS 11,471/3 and 25 03 1876,Google ScholarIbid., 11,121.

50 Arequipa, to Lima, 17 03 1874, 17 03 1875 and 19 01. 1876, Gibbs MS 11,124;Google ScholarHaync, to Bohl, 26 08. 1878,Google ScholarIbid., 11,120; Sigsworth, E.M, Black Dyke Mills (Liverpool, 1958), pp. 234–54.Google Scholar

51 Hayne, to London, 2 12 1876Google Scholar, Ibid.., II,470/I.

52 BohI to Hayne, 16 May 1873, Gibbs MS 11,121.

53 London to Valparaiso, 28 Feb. and 35 March 1876, Gibbs MS 11,471/3; Levin, , op. cit., pp. 68–9.Google Scholar

54 Lima to Valparaiso, 25 March 1876, Gibbs MS 11,121.

55 London to Valparaiso, 16 Oct. 1876, 31 Aug. 1877 and 29 June 1878, Gibbs MS 11,471/3–5.

56 SPT, 6 May, 25 July and 17 Oct. 1876; El Comercio, 23 June 5876; Bermúdez, , op. cit., pp. 337–43. Private capacity represented 5.4m. quintals (235,000 tons). Government-owned capacity, 8.5 m. quintals (390,000 tons), was halved after closures. Between Aug. 1876 and July 1877 private output totalled 2.8m. quintals (120,000 tons) and Government-owned production was I.95m. quintals (90,000 tons).Google Scholar

57 El Comercio, 16 and 28 06 1876.

58 London to Valparaiso, 15 May and 15 Sept. 1876 and 1 May 1877, Gibbs MS 11,471/2–3; ci. Valparaiso to Lima, 10 May and 14 June 1876, Ibid., I1,120; Read to Bohl, 28 Aug. 1876, Ibid., 11,123.

59 El Comercio, 29 10 1875 and 26 04 1876; MacQueen, , op. Cit., pp. 8 and 96;Google ScholarCamprubí, Alcázar, op. cit., pp. 227–333. The value of the Peruvian sol in London fell from 42d. in Aug. 1875 to 36d. in Oct. 1875 and to 28d. in April 1876.Google Scholar

60 Valparaiso to London, 10 May and 14 June 1876, Gibbs MS 11, 120; cf. London to Valparaiso, 10 May and 23 Dec. 1876 and Henry to Hayne, 24 March 1877, Ibid.., 11, 121.

61 MacQueen, , op. cit., p. 39.Google Scholar

62 London to Valparaiso, 16 Aug. 1877, Gibbs MS II,471/3.

63 Haync to Comber, 22 May 1878, Gibbs MS 11,121; cf. Haync to Miller, 28 June and 30 Oct. 1878, Ibid..

64 BohI to Comber, 8 Jan. 1878, Gibbs MS 11,121.

65 London to Valparaiso, 1 Nov. 1876, I May 1877, I Feb., 1 and 31 May and 16 Nov. 1878, Gibbs MS 11,471/3–7.

66 Royal Commission on Agriculture (P.P. 1881), 17, 56, 953–7, 985.Google Scholar

67 Cowley, C., ‘Antofagasta and Bolivia Railway Company’, unpublished history (1949). This work is held at the Antofagasta and Bolivia Railway Company's offices in London.Google Scholar

68 Valparaiso to London, 25 March 1874, Gibbs MS 11,128; Hicks to Comber, 28 June 1878, Ibid., 11, 118.

69 Hayne to London, 26 May 1874, Gibbs MS 11,128.

70 Valparaiso to London, 16 Aug. 1877, Gibbs MS 11,471/3. In the April–June 1877 trimeStre Gibbs shipped 42,106 tons sold at £14 6s. 8d. per ton. The following deductions applied: (i) Advances from which producers were paid and 2 per cent interest thereon, £313,000, interest on nitrate certificates, £90,000 and commission at, ½ percent, £450, represented £9 11s. 6d. per ton. (ii) Working costs, freightage, loss of weight, insurance, loading and storage, amounted to £3 11s. 3d. (iii) Discounts and commissions were 13s. 7d. per ton. These three items totalled £14 6s. 4d. per ton, leaving a surplus of 4d.

71 El Comercio, 22 Dec. 1877.

72 Camprubí, Alcázar, op. Cit., p. 342.Google Scholar

73 London to Valparaiso, 16 Aug. and 1 Oct. 1877, cf. Hayne to BohI, 21 Aug. 1877, Gibbs MS 11,471/3–5.

74 London to Valparaiso, 31 Aug. 1877, Gibbs MS 11,471/3.

75 London to Valparaiso, 16 Jan. 1878, Gibbs MS 11,471/6.

76 London to Valparaiso, 1 Oct. 1877 and 31 May 1878, Gibbs MS 11,471/3–7.

77 London to Valparaiso, 16 Nov. 1877, Gibbs MS 11,471/5.

78 London to Valparaiso, 1 Dec. 1877, 24 Feb. and 1 March 1878, Gibbs MS 11,471/5.

79 London to Valparaiso, 16 July 1878, Gibbs MS 11,471/6.

80 Daily Telegraph, 30 08 and 1 10 1878; Bermúdez, , op. cit., p. 344;Google ScholarCamprubí, Alcázar, op. cit., pp. 344–7.Google Scholar

81 The terms upon which La Compañía Salitrera administered nitrate were as follows: in the first year is was to advance £60,000 per month for six months and £20,000 per month for six months (£480,000); it was to provide interest (8 per cent) and amortization (4 per cent) on £4.5 million nitrate certificates (£540,000); it was to repay the Government's liabilities to the Lima Banks (£400,000); it was responsible for production costs (£6 los. per ton) upon 234,000 tons (£1.5 million) and all charges (£936,000).

82 George Gibbs to Sawers, 54 Sept. 1878; cf. London to Valparaiso, 31 May and 31 July 1878, Gibbs MS 11,471/6.

83 Gibbs to Graham Rowe, 12 Nov. 1878, Gibbs MS 11,471/7.

84 Graham Rowe to Gibbs, 14 Nov. 1878, Gibbs MS 11,471/7.

85 London to Valparaiso, 20 March and 16 April 1879, Gibbs MS 11,471/7–8.

86 BohI to Small, 29 June 1878, Gibbs MS 11,132; BohI to Read, 4 Sept. 1878, Ibid., 11,121; Read to Bohl, 16 Oct. and 19 Dec. 1878, Ibid., 11, 472; Camprubí, Alcázar, op. cit., p. 350.Google Scholar

87 Burr, R. N., By Reason or Force: Chile and the Balancing of Power in South America, 1830–1905 (Los Angeles, 1965). pp. 118–41.Google Scholar

88 El Comercio, 12 01 1876.

89 MacQueen, , op. cit., pp. 9 and 40.Google Scholar

90 Duffleld, , op. cit., pp. 107–8.Google Scholar

91 Consular Reports (Peru) (P.P. 1878), LXXII, 550–62.

92 George Gibbs to Del Pont, 9 July 1878, Gibbs MS 11,471 /6.