Article contents
Diversified Business Groups and the Transnationalisation of the Salvadorean Economy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 May 2013
Abstract
El Salvador has undergone a deep economic transformation over recent decades, from a model based on agro-exports to an open, transnational service-based economy. This transformation has occurred in a context dominated historically by a small group of elite families that formed family-owned diversified business groups (DBGs). This paper studies the leading groups' strategies in confronting transnationalisation. It shows that the DBGs have adapted to the new realities through a combination of sector shifts, internationalisation and the adoption of different kinds of relationships with multinationals. In spite of this, there is little evidence that the DBGs have become less important or subordinate to multinational corporations. Rather, they have, in different ways, exploited their local and regional knowledge and networks to confront competition at home and expand at the regional level.
Spanish abstract
El Salvador ha padecido una profunda transformación económica en las últimas décadas, pasando de un modelo basado en la agroexportación a una economía abierta, transnacional y basada en servicios. Esta transformación se ha dado en un contexto dominado históricamente por un pequeño núcleo de familias de élite que han formado grupos diversificados empresariales de propiedad familiar. Este artículo estudia las estrategias de tales grupos líderes para confrontar la transnacionalización. Muestra que ellos se han adaptado a las nuevas realidades a través de una combinación de transformaciones de los sectores, la internacionalización y la adopción de diferentes tipos de relaciones con las multinacionales. Pese a ello, hay pocas pruebas de que dichos grupos se han vuelto menos importantes o subordinados de las corporaciones multinacionales. En vez de ello, estos han explotado de diferentes formas su conocimiento y sus redes locales y regionales para enfrentar la competencia en casa y expandirse a nivel regional.
Portuguese abstract
El Salvador sofreu profundas transformações econômicas durante décadas recentes, partindo de um modelo baseado em exportações agrícolas para uma economia transnacional baseada em serviços. Esta transformação ocorreu em um contexto historicamente dominado por um pequeno grupo de famílias da elite que formaram grupos empresariais diversificados (GEDs) pertencentes às famílias. Este artigo estuda as estratégias dos principais grupos ao confrontar a transnacionalização. Mostra que os GEDs adaptaram-se às novas realidades através de uma combinação de deslocamentos de setores, internacionalização e a adoção de diferentes tipos de relações com as multinacionais. A despeito disto, há poucas evidências que indicam uma perda de importância ou subordinação dos GEDs às corporações multinacionais. Ao invés, eles têm explorado seu conhecimento local e regional assim como suas redes de formas distintas para enfrentar competição doméstica e para expandir no nível regional.
Keywords
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013
References
1 See, for example, Rettberg, Angelika, ‘Business versus Business: Grupos and Organised Business in Colombia’, Latin American Politics and Society, 46: 4 (2005), pp. 31–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Durand, Francisco, ‘Collective Action and the Empowerment of Peruvian Business’, in Durand, Francisco and Silva, Eduardo (eds.), Organised Business, Economic Change, and Democracy in Latin America (Miami, FL: North-South Center Press, 1998), pp. 253–80Google Scholar.
2 Casanova, Lourdes, Global Latinas: Latin America's Emerging Multinationals, the New Latin American Jaguars (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 Segovia, Alexander, Integración real y grupos de poder económico en América Central (San José, Costa Rica: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 2005)Google Scholar; Colburn, Forrest and Sánchez, Fernando, Empresarios centroamericanos y apertura económica (San José: Editorial Universitaria Centroamericana, 2000)Google Scholar.
4 This can be consulted at www.cnr.gob.sv/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=89&Itemid=142.
5 The interviews were conducted in October 2010 and March 2011. Some are referred to by the interviewee's full name, while others are anonymous due to requests for confidentiality.
6 Granovetter, Mark, ‘Business Groups’, in Neil Smelser and Richard Swedberg, Handbook of Economic Sociology (2nd edition, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005), p. 454Google Scholar.
7 Yui, Daphne W., Lu, Yuan, Bruton, Garry D. and Hoskinsson, Robert E., ‘Business Groups: An Integrated Model to Focus Future Research’, Journal of Management Studies, 44: 8 (2007), pp. 1552–79Google Scholar.
8 Hamilton, Gary G. and Feenstra, Robert C., ‘Varieties of Hierarchies and Markets: An Introduction’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 4: 1 (1995), pp. 51–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 Leff, Nathaniel, ‘Industrial Organization and Entrepreneurship in Developing Countries: The Economic Groups’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 26: 4 (1978), pp. 661–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Khanna, Tarun and Yafeh, Yishay, ‘Business Groups in Emerging Markets: Paragons or Parasites?’, Journal of Economic Literature, 45: 2 (2007), pp. 331–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mintz, Beth A.and Michael Schwartz, The Power Structure of American Business (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1985)Google Scholar; Granovetter, ‘Business Groups’.
11 Fisman, Raymond and Khanna, Tarun, ‘Facilitating Development: The Role of Business Groups’, World Development, 32: 4 (2004), pp. 609–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
12 Schneider, Ben Ross and Soskice, David, ‘Inequality in Developed Countries and Latin America: Coordinated, Liberal and Hierarchical Systems’, Economy and Society, 38: 1 (2009), pp. 17–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schneider, Ben Ross, ‘Hierarchical Market Economies and Varieties of Capitalism in Latin America’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 41: 3 (2009), pp. 553–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
13 See also Khanna and Yafeh, ‘Business Groups in Emerging Markets’.
14 Schneider, Ben Ross, ‘A Comparative Political Economy of Diversified Business Groups, or How States Organise Big Business’, Review of International Political Economy, 16: 2 (2008), pp. 1–24Google Scholar.
15 Schneider, ‘A Comparative Political Economy’.
16 Casanova, Lourdes, ‘El ascenso de las multilatinas en la economía mundial’, Información Comercial Española: Revista de Economía, 859 (2011), pp. 21–31Google Scholar.
17 Cuervo-Cazurra, Álvaro, ‘Multilatinas’, Universia Business Review, 25 (2010), pp. 14–33Google Scholar; Teubal, Miguel, ‘Economic Groups and the Rise and Collapse of Neoliberalism in Argentina’, in Hogenboom, Barbara and Jilberto, Alex Fernández (eds.), Big Business and Economic Development: Conglomerates and Economic Groups in Developing Countries and Transition Economies under Globalisation (London: Routledge, 2004), pp. 167–90Google Scholar.
18 Galetti, Pablo, ‘¿Que significa ahora la burguesía nacional?’, Realidad Económica, 201 (2004), pp. 24–9Google Scholar.
19 See, for example, Robinson, William, Transnational Conflicts: Central America, Social Change, and Globalization (London: Verso, 2003)Google Scholar; and Segovia, Integración real y grupos de poder; and see Robinson, William, ‘Global Capitalism Theory and the Emergence of Transnational Elites’, Critical Sociology, 38: 3 (2011), pp. 349–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
20 Evans, Peter, Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State and Local Capital in Brazil (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
21 Schneider, Ben Ross, ‘Economic Liberalization and Corporate Governance: The Resilience of Business Groups in Latin America’, Comparative Politics, 40: 4 (2008), pp. 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
22 Dicken, Peter, Global Shift: Reshaping the Global Economic Map in the 21st Century (London: Sage, 2004)Google Scholar.
23 Guillén, Mauro, ‘Groups in Emerging Economies: A Resource-Based View’, Academy of Management Journal, 43: 3 (2000), pp. 363–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
24 Casaus Arzú, Marta Elena, Guatemala: lineaje y racismo (San José, Costa Rica: FLACSO, 1992), p. 8Google Scholar.
25 Schneider, ‘Hierarchical Market Economies’.
26 Sánchez-Ancochea, Diego, ‘State, Firms and the Process of Industrial Upgrading: Latin America's Variety of Capitalism and the Costa Rican Experience’, Economy and Society, 38: 1 (2009), p. 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
27 Wilson, Everett Alan, ‘La crisis de integración nacional en El Salvador’, in Menjívar, Rafael and Véjar, Guidos (eds.), El Salvador de 1840 a 1935 (San Salvador: UCA Editores, 1978), pp. 151–241Google Scholar.
28 Paige, Jeffery M., Coffee and Power: Revolution and the Rise of Democracy in Central America (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997), p. 14Google Scholar.
29 Wilson, ‘La crisis de la integración nacional’; Paige, Coffee and Power, p. 19.
30 Colindres, Eduardo, Fundamentos económicos de la burguesía salvadoreña (San Salvador: UCA Editores, 1977)Google Scholar.
31 Baloyra, Enrique, El Salvador en transición (San Salvador: UCA Editores, 1989)Google Scholar.
32 Ibid.
33 Segovia, Alexander, Transformación estructural y reforma económica en El Salvador (Guatemala City: F&G Editores, 2002)Google Scholar.
34 Ibid.
35 Pelupessy, Wim and Uggen, John F., ‘Adjustment Policies in El Salvador during the 1980s’, Latin American Perspectives, 18: 4 (1991), pp. 48–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
36 Rosa, Herman, Trayectorías de cambio económico de El Salvador: una perspectiva desde las fuentes de divisas (San Salvador: Prisma, 2010)Google Scholar.
37 Gammage, Sarah, ‘Exporting People and Recruiting Remittances: A Development Strategy for El Salvador?’, Latin American Perspectives, 33: 6 (2006), pp. 75–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rosa, Trayectorías de cambio económico.
38 Paige, Coffee and Power, chap. 6.
39 Rivera, Francisco Robles, ‘Nuevos espacios de acumulación: modelo de ajuste estructural en El Salvador y Costa Rica (1980–1991)’, Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 128–9 (2010), pp. 97–117Google Scholar.
40 Peñate, Salvador Arias, Atlas de la pobreza y la opulencia en El Salvador (San Salvador: Talleres Gráficos UCA, 2010)Google Scholar.
41 Serrano, Carlos Rodolfo Paniagua, ‘El bloque empresarial hegemónico salvadoreño’, Estudios Centroamericanos, 645–6 (2002), pp. 609–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
42 Alfonso Goitia, ‘El otoño del neoliberalismo en El Salvador’, unpubl. manuscript, 2005.
43 Segovia, Integración real y grupos de poder.
44 Ibid., p. 82.
45 Colburn and Sánchez, Empresarios centroamericanos.
46 The amounts included here are from the Secretaría Ejecutiva del Consejo Monetario Centroamericano (Executive Secretariat of the Central American Monetary Council), referred to in Rosa, Trayectorías del cambio económico.
47 The literature on multilatinas shows that most of them also expanded first into neighbouring countries: see Casanova, ‘El ascenso de las multilatinas’.
48 Richard Aitkenhead, ‘Tendencias y características de las estrategias empresariales en el contexto del proceso de integración económica Centroamericana’ (2002), available at www.sica.int/benecosto/inf/ra.pdf.
49 ‘Grupo Poma regionaliza su imagen corporativa’, Elsalvador.com, 7 Dec. 2005.
50 Interview with Fernando Poma, president of Real Hotels & Resorts, San Salvador, 8 March 2011.
51 ‘Dos nuevos Simán abren en noviembre’, La Prensa, 4 Sep. 2004.
52 Interview with regional marketing manager, Grupo Unicomer, San Salvador, 10 March 2011.
53 For more information, see the Unicomer website at www.unicomer.com.
54 ‘Samuel Quirós: Ganador de la Palma de Oro’, Elsalvador.com, 17 Feb. 2006.
55 For Grupo de Sola, see Estrategia & Negocios, July–Aug. 2008.
56 See www.agrisal.com
57 In 1998 Mesoamérica entered into a partnership with Telefónica de España to develop cellular networks in El Salvador and Guatemala. The two groups interchanged shares in 2001, and Mesoamérica sold its stock to Telefónica in 2003. A similar process occurred with respect to the development of broadband internet, which was done in conjunction between Mesoamérica and Millicom, and sold to the latter in 2008: see www.mesoamerica.com/telecom.html.
58 Grupo de Sola here refers to the companies belonging to Francisco R. R. de Sola and his son, Francisco de Sola Herbard.
59 ‘Monsanto controlará 70% mercado semillas’, Elsalvador.com, 11 July 2008.
60 Interview with Francisco de Sola, 12 March 2011.
61 This is based on a combination of data found in the Registro Comercial (Commercial Registry) in El Salvador, at the company website of the Peruvian group (www.alicorp.com.pe/english/home.html) and in various articles on Elsalvador.com.
62 ‘Zablah, visionario de la economía’, Elsalvador.com, 15 April 2004; ‘Palma de Oro es del Grupo Zablah’, Elsalvador.com, 4 Feb. 2004; see also www.asiplastic.org/detalle_empresa.php?&empr=54.
63 Interview with Eduardo Zablah-Touché, San Salvador, 9 March 2011.
64 Data from the Registro Comercial and various newspaper reports.
65 ‘Los súper se unen para competir con Wal-Mart’, El Periódico (Guatemala), 12 May 2008.
66 US Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Services, Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN), ‘Report: El Salvador’ (Washington, DC: GAIN Report ES1012, 2010), available at http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Retail%20Foods_San%20Salvador_El%20Salvador_11-29-2010.pdf.
67 See www.aviancataca.com/Lang/es/ri/gobierno/composicionJuntaDirectiva.html and Registro Comercial.
68 ‘Chronology: A Story in 10 Chapters’, available at centennial.holcim.com/fileadmin/templates/CENTENNIAL/doc/History_brochure_english_final_web.pdf.
69 Registro Comercial and interview with Tomás Regalado Papini, 15 Nov. 2012.
70 This was, for example, of key importance for the decision by Grupo Poma to build a shopping mall (Multiplaza Pacific) in Panama City: interview with Stanley Motta (Inversiones Bahía), 27 May 2011, conducted by Yuri Kasahara.
71 See Kasahara, Yuri, ‘Should I Stay or Should I Go? The Impact of Banking Sector Policies on the Strategies of Central American Business Groups’, Business and Politics, 14: 4 (2012), pp. 1–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Central American countries normally perform badly in international shareholders' rights indexes. In the Protecting Investors index published by the World Bank in 2012, the best-placed Central American country was Panama, ranked at 82 out of 185 countries; this was followed by Nicaragua, ranked at 100, and Guatemala, ranked at 158. The worst were Costa Rica, Honduras and El Salvador, all ranked 169. Available online at www.doingbusiness.org/data/exploretopics/protecting-investors.
72 Guillén, ‘Groups in Emerging Economies’.
73 Casanova, Global Latinas.
- 11
- Cited by