Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T07:25:27.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Law and Politics in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights

A New Database on Judicial Behavior and Compliance in the IACtHR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Øyvind Stiansen ,
Daniel Naurin  and
Live Standal Bøyum
Øyvind Stiansen
Affiliation:
PluriCourts, University of Oslo
Daniel Naurin*
Affiliation:
PluriCourts, University of Oslo
Live Standal Bøyum
Affiliation:
PluriCourts, University of Oslo
*
Contact the corresponding author, Daniel Naurin, at daniel.naurin@jus.uio.no.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

International courts are increasingly affecting domestic and international politics and are receiving increased attention in political science research. In addition to their political importance, international courts provide new opportunities for testing theories of judicial politics, yet further progress requires access to data, particularly on the courts that have so far received less scrutiny. This article introduces a new database on Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) judgments. The database contains information on case proceedings, judicial behavior, judgment content, the actors involved, and compliance with remedial orders. The current version of the database contains data on 201 IACtHR cases. We illustrate how the database can be used to address important questions in judicial politics by analyzing whether the propensity of the IACtHR to rule against a responding state correlates with the positions taken by the same state early in the proceedings before the court. We find evidence of such a relationship.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Law and Courts , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , Fall 2020 , pp. 359 - 379
Copyright
© 2020 by the Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This work was supported by the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme, project 223274 (PluriCourts). We are grateful to Cesare Romano for making available the case summaries prepared by the The Inter-American Court of Human Rights Project, Los Angeles, and for helpful feedback on our coding procedures. We also thank the editor and three anonymous reviewers, Cecilia Baillet, Theresa Squatrito, Andreas Føllesdal, Matthew Saul, and Leiry Cornejo Chavez for providing helpful suggestions on our codebook. Stein Arne Brekke and Ellen Emilie Henriksen provided research assistance.

References

Allee, Todd L., and Huth, Paul K. 2006. “Legitimizing Dispute Settlement: International Legal Rulings as Domestic Political Cover.” American Political Science Review 100 (2): 219–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J. 2014. The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J., Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., and Helfer, Laurence R. 2019. “Theorizing the Judicialization of International Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 63 (3): 449–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altwicker-Hàmori, Szilvia, Altwicker, Tilmann, and Peters, Anne. 2016. “Measuring Violations of Human Rights: An Empirical Analysis of Awards in Respect of Non-pecuniary Damage under the European Convention on Human Rights.” Heidelberg Journal of International Law 76:1–51.Google Scholar
Bricker, Benjamin. 2017. “Breaking the Principle of Secrecy: An Examination of Judicial Dissent in the European Constitutional Courts.” Law and Policy 39 (2): 170–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, Marc L., and Reinhardt, Eric. 2003. “Developing Countries and General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement.” Journal of World Trade 37 (4): 719–35.Google Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford J., Gabel, Matthew, and Hankla, Charles. 2008. “Judicial Behavior under Political Constraints: Evidence from the European Court of Justice.” American Political Science Review 102 (4): 435–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavallaro, James L., and Erin Brewer, Stephanie. 2008. “Reevaluating Regional Human Rights Litigation in the Twenty-First Century: The Case of the Inter-American Court.” American Journal of International Law 102 (4): 768–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudoin, Stephen, Kucik, Jeffrey, and Pelc, Krzysztof. 2016. “Do WTO Disputes Actually Increase Trade?” International Studies Quarterly 60 (2): 294–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cichowski, Rachel A. 2013. “Mobilisation, Litigation and Democratic Governance.” Representation 49 (3): 321–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cichowski, Rachel A. 2016. “The European Court of Human Rights, Amicus Curiae, and Violence against Women.” Law and Society Review 50 (4): 890–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Tom S. 2011. The Limits of Judicial Independence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fariss, Christopher J. 2014. “Respect for Human Rights Has Improved over Time: Modeling the Changing Standard of Accountability.” American Political Science Review 108 (2): 297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Judith, Kahler, Miles, Keohane, Robert O., and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2000. “Introduction: Legalization and World Politics.” International Organization 54 (3): 385–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grewal, Sharanbir, and Voeten, Erik. 2015. “Are New Democracies Better Human Rights Compliers?” International Organization 69 (2): 497–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanretty, Chris. 2012. “Dissent in Iberia: The Ideal Points of Justices on the Spanish and Portuguese Constitutional Tribunals.” European Journal of Political Research 51 (5): 671–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Darren, and Jacoby, Wade. 2010. “Partial Compliance: A Comparison of the European and Inter-American Courts of Human Rights.” Journal of International Law and International Relations 6 (1): 35–85.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R., and Voeten, Erik. 2014. “International Courts as Agents of Legal Change: Evidence from LGBT Rights in Europe.” International Organization 68 (1): 77–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillebrecht, Courtney. 2014a. Domestic Politics and International Human Rights Tribunals: The Problem of Compliance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillebrecht, Courtney. 2014b. “The Power of Human Rights Tribunals: Compliance with the European Court of Human Rights and Domestic Policy Change.” European Journal of International Relations 20 (4): 1100–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huneeus, Alexandra. 2011. “Courts Resisting Courts: Lessons from the Inter-American Court’s Struggle to Enforce Human Rights.” Cornell International Law Journal 44 (3): 493–533.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Jay N. 2016. “The Politics of Judicial Procedures: The Role of Public Oral Hearings in the German Constitutional Court.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (4): 990–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, Olof, and Naurin, Daniel. 2016. “Judicial Independence and Political Uncertainty: How the Risk of Override Impacts on the Court of Justice of the EU.” International Organization 70 (2): 377–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, Olof, Naurin, Daniel, Derlén, Mattias, and Lindholm, Johan. 2017. “Speaking Law to Power: The Strategic Use of Precedent of the Court of Justice of the European Union.” Comparative Political Studies 50:870–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Meredith Kolsky. 2006. “The Lack of Dissent in WTO Dispute Settlement.” Journal of International Economic Law 9 (4): 895–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupu, Yonatan, and Voeten, Erik. 2012. “Precedent in International Courts: A Network Analysis of Case Citations by the European Court of Human Rights.” British Journal of Political Science 42 (2): 413–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naurin, Daniel, and Stiansen, Øyvind. 2020. “The Dilemma of Dissent: Split Judicial Decisions and Compliance with Judgments from the International Human Rights Judiciary.” Comparative Political Studies 53 (6): 959–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuman, Gerald L. 2008. “Import, Export, and Regional Consent in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.” European Journal of International Law 19 (1): 101–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasqualucci, Jo M. 1999. “Preliminary Objections before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Legitimate Issues and Illegitimate Tactics.” Virginia Journal of International Law 40 (1): 1–114.Google Scholar
Pasqualucci, Jo M. 2012. The Practice and Procedure of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Eric A., and Yoo, John C. 2005. “Judicial Independence in International Tribunals.” California Law Review 93 (1): 1–74.Google Scholar
Sandholtz, Wayne. 2017. “Expanding Rights: Norm Innovation in the European and Inter-American Courts.” In Expanding Human Rights: 21st Century Norms and Governance, ed. Brysk, Alison and Stohl, Michael, 156–76. Cheltenham: Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandholtz, Wayne, and Rangel Padilla, Mariana. 2016. “Law and Politics in the Inter American System: The Amnesty Cases.” Unpublished manuscript prepared for presentation at the World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Poznan, Poland, July 23–28.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. David, and Small, Melvin. 1994. Correlates of War Project: International and Civil War Data, 1816–1992. ICPSR 9905. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
Squatrito, Theresa. 2018. “Amicus Curiae Briefs in the WTO DSM: Good or Bad News for Non-state Actor Involvement?” World Trade Review 17 (1): 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K., and Moore, Will H. 2011. “Judicial Power in Domestic and International Politics.” International Organization 65 (3): 553–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K., and Romero, Alexia. 2019. “Rational Remedies: The Role of Opinion Clarity in the Inter-American Human Rights System.” International Studies Quarterly 63 (3): 477–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiansen, Øyvind. 2019a. “Delayed but Not Derailed: Legislative Compliance with European Court of Human Rights judgments.” International Journal of Human Rights 23:1221–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiansen, Øyvind. 2019b. “Directing Compliance? Remedial Approach and Compliance with European Court of Human Rights Judgments.” British Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiansen, Øyvind, and Voeten, Erik. 2017. “The Georgetown/PluriCourts European Court of Human Rights Database.” On file with authors.Google Scholar
Stiansen, Øyvind, and Voeten, Erik. 2018. “Backlash and Judicial Restraint: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights.” Working paper, Social Science Research Network. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3166110.Google Scholar
Vanberg, Georg. 2001. “Legislative-Judicial Relations: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Constitutional Review.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 346–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanberg, Georg. 2005. The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vanberg, Georg. 2015. “Constitutional Courts in Comparative Perspective: A Theoretical Assessment.” Annual Review of Political Science 18:167–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voeten, Erik. 2007. “The Politics of International Judicial Appointments: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights.” International Organization 61 (4): 669–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voeten, Erik. 2008. “The Impartiality of International Judges: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights.” American Political Science Review 102 (4): 417–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voeten, Erik. 2014. “Domestic Implementation of European Court of Human Rights Judgments: Legal Infrastructure and Government Effectiveness Matter; A Reply to Dia Anagnostou and Alina Mungiu-Pippidi.” European Journal of International Law 25 (1): 229–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Stiansen et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 470.7 KB