Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T11:13:02.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Challenging Themes in American Health Information Privacy and the Public’s Health: Historical and Modern Assessments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

James G. Hodge Jr.  and
Kieran G. Gostin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Protecting the privacy of individually-identifiable health data is a dominant health policy objective in the new millennium. Technological, economic, and health-related reasons substantiate the development of a national electronic health information infrastructure. Through this emerging infrastructure, billions of pieces of health data of varying sensitivities are exchanged annually to provide health care services and service transactions, conduct health research, and promote the public’s health. These multi-purpose, rapid exchanges of electronic health data, far removed from the typical disclosure of health information through the doctor/patient relationship of yesteryear, contribute to heightened individual concerns about identifiable health data. Responding to American fears and perceptions of actual and potential privacy abuses, policymakers have recently developed new, modern privacy protections through legislative and regulatory laws, as well as ethical and industry codes.

Modern health information privacy protections are reflected in federal regulations developed by the federal Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA).

Type
Symposium
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , Winter 2004 , pp. 670 - 679
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hodge, J. G. Jr., Gostin, L., and Jacobson, P., “Legal Issues Concerning Electronic Health Information,” JAMA 282 (1999): 1466–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gostin, L., Hodge, J. G. Jr., “Personal Privacy and Common Goods: A Framework for Balancing Under the National Health Information Privacy Rule,” Minnesota Law Review 86 (2002): 1439–1480.Google Scholar
Pub. L. No. 104-191, 110 Stat. 1936 (1996).Google Scholar
Gregory, J., John Gregory’s Writings, McCullough, L.B., ed., “Observations on the Duties and Offices of a Physician,” (Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998): at 105.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Code of Medical Ethics of the American Medical Association (1847): chapter 1, art. 1, § 2, at <http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/upload/mm/369/1847code.pdf> (last visited October 7, 2004).+(last+visited+October+7,+2004).>Google Scholar
Breckenridge, A.C., The Right to Privacy, from appendix, Warren, S.D. and Brandeis, L.D., “The Right to Privacy” (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1970): at 131–152.Google Scholar
Westin, Alan F., “Privacy Rights and Responsibilities in the Next Era of the Information Age” in Firestone, C.M. and Schement, J.R., eds., Toward an Information Bill of Rights and Responsibilities. (Washington D.C.: The Aspen Institute, 1995): At 79.Google Scholar
Dublin, L.I., The Reporting of Disease, The Next Step in Life Conservation, Addresses Presented to Association of Life Insurance Presidents (5 June 1914), From appendix: “A Model State Law for Morbidity Reports” (16 June 1913).Google Scholar
Dublin, L.I., The Reporting of Disease, The Next Step in Life Conservation, Addresses Presented to Association of Life Insurance Presidents (5 June 1914), From appendix: “A Model State Law for Morbidity Reports” (16 June 1913) § 3.Google Scholar
Dublin, L.I., The Reporting of Disease, The Next Step in Life Conservation, Addresses Presented to Association of Life Insurance Presidents (5 June 1914), From appendix: “A Model State Law for Morbidity Reports” (16 June 1913) § 13.Google Scholar
Dublin, L.I., The Reporting of Disease, The Next Step in Life Conservation, Addresses Presented to Association of Life Insurance Presidents (5 June 1914): at 3–5.Google Scholar
Hanson, W.C., Manual Relating to The Powers and Duties of The State Inspectors of Health of Massachusetts (Boston: Wright and Potter Printing Co., State printers, 1908); Iowa State Board of Health, Code of Rules and Regulations for the Protection of the Public Health and for the Restriction and Prevention of Contagious and Infectious Diseases (1907); Iowa State Board of Health, Rules and Regulations of the Iowa State Department of Health Relating to Reportable Diseases (Des Moines: The State of Iowa, 1926).Google Scholar
Hanson, W.C., Manual Relating to The Powers and Duties of The State Inspectors of Health of Massachusetts (Boston: Wright and Potter Printing Co., State printers, 1908): at 9; Iowa State Board of Health, Code of Rules and Regulations for the Protection of the Public Health and for the Restriction and Prevention of Contagious and Infectious Diseases (1907): Rule 2; Iowa State Board of Health, Rules and Regulations of the Iowa State Department of Health Relating to Reportable Diseases (Des Moines: The State of Iowa, 1926): § IV, 1, C.Google Scholar
Rohrer, C.W.G., On the Reporting of Communicable Diseases (Baltimore: Maryland State Department of Health, 1913): at 1.Google Scholar
Rohrer, C.W.G., On the Reporting of Communicable Diseases (Baltimore: Maryland State Department of Health, 1913): at 8.Google Scholar
Rohrer, C.W.G., On the Reporting of Communicable Diseases (Baltimore: Maryland State Department of Health, 1913): at 1–6.Google Scholar
Rosen, G., From Medical Police to Social Medicine: Essays on the History of Health Care (New York: Science History Publications, 1974): at 248.Google Scholar
Hanson, W.C., Manual Relating to The Powers and Duties of The State Inspectors of Health of Massachusetts (Boston: Wright and Potter Printing Co., State printers, 1908): at 6.Google Scholar
Georgia, , Georgia Health Laws and Rules and Regulations of State Board of Health (Atlanta: State of Georgia, Dept. of Public Health, 1946): § 11.Google Scholar
Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Vol. 2, pp. 181–182. (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949): article 1.Google Scholar
Department of Health, Education and Welfare, “Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research: Report of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research,” at <http://www.med.umich.edu/irbmed/ethics/belmont/BELMONTR.HTM#respect> (last visited October 7, 2004).+(last+visited+October+7,+2004).>Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Faden, R.R., Beauchamp, T.L., in collaboration with King, N.M.P., A History and Theory of Informed Consent (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986): at 86.Google Scholar
Faden, R.R., Beauchamp, T.L., in collaboration with King, N.M.P., A History and Theory of Informed Consent (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986): at 9.Google Scholar
As quoted in R.R. Faden, T.L. Beauchamp, in collaboration with King, N.M.P., A History and Theory of Informed Consent (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986): at 40.Google Scholar
Westin, Alan F., “Privacy Rights and Responsibilities in the Next Era of the Information Age,” in Firestone, C.M. and Schement, J.R., eds. Toward and Information Bill of Rights and Responsibilities (Washington D.C.: The Aspen Institute, 1995): at 91.Google Scholar
Westin, Alan F., “Privacy Rights and Responsibilities in the Next Era of the Information Age,” in Firestone, C.M. and Schement, J.R., eds. Toward and Information Bill of Rights and Responsibilities (Washington D.C.: The Aspen Institute, 1995): at 92.Google Scholar
10 CFR §745.116 (5) (1991).Google Scholar
National Social Welfare Assembly, Committee on Confidentiality, Confidentiality in Social Services to Individuals; An Examination of Basic Concepts and Everyday Practices, with Suggestions for Overcoming Current Problems (New York, 1958): 29.Google Scholar
Faden, R.R., Beauchamp, T.L., in collaboration with King, N.M.P., A History and Theory of Informed Consent (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986): at 41.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “HIPAA Privacy Rule and Public Health: Guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and the Department of Health and Human Services,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 52 (Supp.) (2003): 1–20.Google Scholar
Hodge, J. G. Jr., “Health Information Privacy and Public Health,” Journal of Law, Medicine, & Ethics 31, no. 4 (2004): 663–671.Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. § 160.103.Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. § 164.501.Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. § 164.514(a)(b).Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. § 164.501.Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. § 164.514(a)(b).Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. § 164.520.Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. §164.530.Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. § 164.530(b)(1).Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. § 164.530(a)(1).Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. § 164.528.Google Scholar
Hodge, , supra note 33.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, supra note 32.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Hodge, , supra note 33.Google Scholar
Hanson, , supra note 13; Iowa State Board of Health, supra note 13.Google Scholar
64 Fed Reg. 59929, Nov. 3, 1999.Google Scholar
Hodge, , supra note 33.Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. §§ 164.524, 164.526.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, supra note 32.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Gostin, & Hodge, , supra note 2.Google Scholar
Hodge, , supra note 33.Google Scholar
Gostin, & Hodge, , supra note 2.Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. § 164.508(c).Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. § 164.502(a)(2).Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. § 164.506.Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. § 164.512(f).Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. § 164.512(e).Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. § 164.502(g)(3).Google Scholar
45 C.F.R. § 164.510.Google Scholar
Hodge, Gostin, & Jacobson, , supra note 1.Google Scholar