Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:31:07.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Drug Advertising, Continuing Medical Education, and Physician Prescribing: A Historical Review and Reform Proposal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Marc A. Rodwin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Public policy tries to promote appropriate drug use by allowing firms to market drugs in interstate commerce only for uses that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has found to be safe and effective. Because of their medical knowledge, physicians are authorized to prescribe drugs even for uses unapproved by the FDA. Nevertheless, physicians have relied on drug firms for information on appropriate prescribing despite the inherent tension between drug firm dissemination of information to promote sales and rational prescribing. In the past, physicians often relied particularly on drug firm advertising for information on drug use. Today, physicians rely on drug firms to finance continuing medical education (CME). A historical review reveals connections between these two different ways commercial interests have influenced the information that physicians receive and points the way to needed reforms.

Type
Independent
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , Winter 2010 , pp. 807 - 815
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

I develop the themes in this article, along with analysis of other financial conflicts of interest, in Rodwin, M. A., Conflicts of Interest and the Future of Medicine: The United States, France and Japan (New York: Oxford University Press, forthcoming February, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, G. H., “The Abbott Alkaloidal Company - High Finance and Methods of Working the Medical Profession,” JAMA 50, no. 11 (1908): 897.Google Scholar
U.S. Federal Trade Commission, Economic Report on Antibiotics Manufacturers (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1958): At 128. Ferber, R. and Wales, H. G., “The Effectiveness of Pharmaceutical Promotion,” in University of Illinois Bureau of Economic and Business Research Bulletin (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Leake, C. D., “The Pharmacologic Evaluation of New Drugs,” JAMA 93, no. 21 (1909): 1632–1634. See also Irons, E. E., “The Clinical Evaluation of Drugs,” JAMA 93, no. 20 (1929): 1523–1524; Puckner, W. A. and Leech, P. N., “The Introduction of New Drugs,” JAMA 93, no. 21 (1929): 1627–1630.Google Scholar
Study of Administered Prices in the Drug Industry, Report No. 448, Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly, Committee on the Judiciary, 87th Congress (1961) (statement of Warner); see id., at 210. Study of Administered Prices in the Drug Industry, Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly, Committee on the Judiciary, 87th Congress, at 210 (1961) (statement of Smith).Google Scholar
May, C. D., “Selling Drugs by Educating Physicians,” Journal of Medical Education 36, no. 1 (1961): 1–23.Google Scholar
Study of Administered Prices in the Drug Industry, Report No. 448, Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly, Committee on the Judiciary, 87th Congress (1961) (testimony of Dr.May, Charles D. at hearings, citing Wagner, T, in Ethical Pharmaceutical Promotion: The Workings and Philosophies of the Pharmaceuticals Industry (New York: National Pharmaceutical Council, Inc., 1959).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly, Committee on the Judiciary, 87th Congress (1961).Google Scholar
Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly, Committee on the Judiciary, Administered Prices Drugs, U.S. Senate Hearings, vol. 18, 10, 338 (1960) (testimony of Bean, William B., Chair of the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Medical School).Google Scholar
Podolsky, S. H. and Greene, J. A., “A Historical Perspectives of Pharmaceutical Promotion and Physician Education,” JAMA 300, no. 9 (2008): 1071–1073; Greene, J. A. and Podolsky, S. H., “Keeping Modern in Medicine: Pharmaceutical Promotion and Physician Education in Postwar America,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 83, no. 2 (2009): 331–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaffin Report, reprinted in U.S. Senate Hearings, at 505 (1961–1962).Google Scholar
Committee on Ways and Means (1969) (statement from Hirsh, Bernard D. before U.S. Senate, cited in Silverman, M. and Lee, P., Pills, Profits & Politics [Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974]: at 53–54); Mintz, M., “JAMA Pleads Case for Tax Exemption,” Washington Post, March 20, 1969, at 24.Google Scholar
Mintz, M., “Not-Guilty Plea Entered in False Drug Ad Case,” Washington Post, December 7, 1965, at 12.Google Scholar
Villanueva, P., “Accuracy of Pharmaceutical Advertisements in Medical Journals,” The Lancet 361, no. 4 (2003): 26–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sevringhaus, E., “Interdependence of the Medical Profession and the Pharmaceutical Industry,” JAMA 152, no. 16 (1953): 1525.Google Scholar
Task Force on Prescription Drugs, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, The Drug Makers and the Drug Distributors (1968), at 6.Google Scholar
Subcommittee on Monopoly, Select Committee on Small Business, Present Status of Competition in the Pharmaceutical Industry, 91st Congress 4056 (1969), at 10 (testimony of Faulkner, James M.); Select Committee on Small Business, Present Status of Competition in the Pharmaceutical Industry, Subcommittee on Monopoly, 91st Congress, 5727 (1969), at 14, (testimony of Pinkney, Edward); Subcommittee on Monopoly, Select Committee on Small Business, Effect of Promotion and Advertising of Over-the-counter Drugs on Competition, Small Business, and the Health and Welfare of the Public, 92nd Congress 541 (1971), at 2.Google Scholar
Ludmerer, K. M., Time to Heal: American Medical Education from the Turn of the Century to the Era of Managed Care (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999): Chap. 4, the “Rise of Graduate Medical Education,” at 79–101.Google Scholar
Petit, D. W., “The Physician Recognition Award,” JAMA 213, no. 10 (1970): 1668–1670; Stearns, N. S., Getchell, M. E., and Gold, R. A., Continuing Medical Education in Community Hospitals: A Manual for Program Development (Boston: Massachusetts Medical Society, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute of Medicine, Committee on Planning a Continuing Health Professional Education Institute, Redesigning Continuing Education in the Health Professions (Washington, D.C: National Academies Press, 2010), available at <http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12704.html> (last visited September 30, 2010).+(last+visited+September+30,+2010).>Google Scholar
Subcommittee on Monopoly of Select Committee on Small Business, Competitive Problems in the Drug Industry, Part 30, 94th Congress, 2nd Session (1976).Google Scholar
Id., at 13919.Google Scholar
Id., at 13920.Google Scholar
Id., at 13913.Google Scholar
Id., at 13914.Google Scholar
Id., at 14015.Google Scholar
The organizations that founded and govern Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) are the following: American Board of Medical Specialties; American Hospital Association; American Medical Association; Association of American Medical Colleges; Association for Hospital Medical Education; Council for Medical Specialty Societies; and Federation of State Medical Boards of the U.S.Google Scholar
American Medical Association, U.S. Medical Licensure Statistics 1985 and Licensure Requirements 1986 (Chicago: American Medical Association, 1987): At Table 14, 30; American Medical Association, Continuing Medical Education for Licensure Reregistration, State Medical Licensure Requirements and Statistics, 2009 (Chicago: American Medical Association, 2008).Google Scholar
Data supplied by ACCME for 2000 and 2006, Data for 1990 from personal communication from Murray Kopelow, President, ACCME to author (November, 2007); see also, Peterson, E. D., Overstreet, K. M., Parochka, J. N., and Lemon, M. R., “Medical Education and Communication Companies in CME: An Updated Profile,” Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 24, no. 8 (2008): 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statement from the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical education (ACCME) to the Institute of Medicine Committee on Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice, June 2008, at 5, available at <http://www.arrs.org/uploadedFiles/ARRS/Life_Long_Learning_Center/Educators_ToolKit/ToIOMConflictOfInterest.pdf> (last visited September 30, 2010).+(last+visited+September+30,+2010).>Google Scholar
Senate Committee of Labor and Human Resources, Advertising, Marketing and Promotion, 101st Congress (1990), at 174–175.Google Scholar
Witt, A., “Drug Company Supported Activities in Scientific or Education Contexts: Draft Concept Paper,” Federal Register 57, no. 229 (1991): 56412 (obtained under the Freedom of Information Act).Google Scholar
“Final Guidance on Industry-Supported Scientific and Educational Activities,” Federal Register 62, no. 232 (December 3, 1997): 64074–64100.Google Scholar
Joseph, J. N., Deaton, D., Ehsan, H., and Bonanno, M. A., “Enforcement Related to Off-Label Marketing and Use of Drugs and Devices: Where Have We Been and Where are We Going?” Journal of Health & Life Sciences Law 2, no. 2 (2009): 73–108.Google Scholar
Civil Settlement Agreement between the United States and Serono, Inc., available at <http://www.corporatecrimereporter.com/documents/Serono-CivilSettlementAgreemnt.pdf> (last visited September 30, 2010); Craft, G. Jr., “Promoting Off-Label In Pursuit Of Profit: An Examination of a Fraudulent Business Model,” Houston Journal of Health Law & Policy 8, no. 1 (2007): 103–131.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D., “Drug Firm's Cash Sways Debate Over Test for Pregnant Women,” Wall Street Journal, December 13, 2006, at A1.Google Scholar
Personal communication from Anonymous to author (September 2007).Google Scholar
Personal communication from Mark Schaffer to author (October 2007).Google Scholar
Physicians World, available at <http://www.pwcg.com/whoweare/html> (last visited December 3, 2001).+(last+visited+December+3,+2001).>Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine, Redesigning Continuing Education in the Health Professions, supra note 21.Google Scholar
Steinbrook, R., “Financial Support of Continuing Education in the Health Professions,” in Continuing Education in the Health Professions: Improving Healthcare Through Lifelong Lessons, at 104–126, available at <http://www.josiahmacyfoundation.org/documents/pub_ContEd_inHealthProf.pdf> (last visited September 30, 2010).+(last+visited+September+30,+2010).>Google Scholar
The ACCME distinguishes between commercial support (grants to CME providers) and income from advertising and exhibits at CME meetings. I included both under commercial support. Most funding comes from the grants. See ACCME, Annual Report Data 2004, available at <http://www.accme.org/dir_docs/doc_upload/2130a818–1c9f-400b-9d54–56b3f8f9a2f6_uploaddocument.pdf> (last visited September 30, 2010); ACCME, Annual Report Data 1998, available at <http://www.accme.org/dir_docs/doc_upload/dc316660–2a48–46d4–916f-60334f7527ba_uploaddocument.pdf> (last visited September 30, 2010); ACCME, Annual Report Data 2008, available at <http://www.accme.org/dir_docs/doc_upload/1f8dc476–246a-4e8e-91d3-d24ff2f5bfec_uploaddocument.pdf> (last visited September 30, 2010).+(last+visited+September+30,+2010);+ACCME,+Annual+Report+Data+1998,+available+at++(last+visited+September+30,+2010);+ACCME,+Annual+Report+Data+2008,+available+at++(last+visited+September+30,+2010).>Google Scholar
See Steinman, M. A., Bero, L. A., and Chren, M. et al., “Narrative Review: The Promotion of Gabapentin: An Analysis of Internal Industry Documents,” Annals of Internal Medicine 145, no. 4 (2006): 284–293. See, also United States of America ex. Rel David Franklin vs. Pfizer, Inc, and Parke-Davis, available through <http://dida.library.ucsf.edu/> (last visited August 16, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, E., Gruen, R., and Mountford, J. et al., “A National Survey of Physician-Industry Relationships,” New England Journal of Medicine 356, no. 17 (2007): 1742–1750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, M. A., “The Impact of Drug Company Funding on the Content of Continuing Medical Education,” Mobius 6, no. 1 (1986): 66–69; Bowman, M. A. and Pearle, D. L., “Changes in Drug Prescribing Patterns Related to Commercial Company Funding of Continuing Medical Education,” Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 8, no. 1 (1988): 13–20; Spingarn, R. W., Berlin, J. A., and Strom, B. L., “When Pharmaceutical Manufacturers' Employees Present Grand Rounds, What do Residents Remember?” Academic Medicine 71, no. 1 (1996): 86–88. However, in 2008, the ACCME commissioned a report to review published studies on the effect of commercial support on CME in terms of bias. The authors reviewed ten empirical studies and concluded the evidence was inconclusive. See Cervero, R. M. and He, J., The Relationship between Commercial Support and Bias in Continuing Medical Education Activities: A Review of the Literature, 2008, available at <http://www.accme.org/dir_docs/doc_upload/aae6ecc3-ae64–40c0–99c6–4c4c0c3b23ec_uploaddocument.pdf> (last visited September 30, 2010).Google Scholar
Witt, A., “AMA Guidelines: ‘We'll Stay the Course. Here's Why,’” Medical Marketing & Media 26 (1991): 82–88.Google Scholar
The FDA said CME programs are unlikely to be independent if: It focuses on a single product; a commercial firm owns the CME provider or employs it for marketing or sales, or recommends individuals who promote its products as faculty, or arranges program invitations or disseminates program materials through its marketing department; a provider is not financially viable without a single commercial firm's support, has significant contacts with FDA-regulated firms, or previously organized programs that did not meet standards for independence.Google Scholar
ACCME, Standards for Commercial Support, 1992, available through <www.accme.org> (last visited September 30, 2010); Relman, A. S., “Separating Continuing Medical Education from Pharmaceutical Marketing,” JAMA 28, no. 15 (2001): 2009–2012; Relman, A. S., “Defending Professional Independence: ACCME's Proposed New Guidelines for Commercial Support of CME,” JAMA 289, no. 18 (2003): 2418–2420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See id. (Relman, , 2001).Google Scholar
“Final Guidance on Industry-Supported Scientific and Educational Activities,” Federal Register 62, no. 232 (1997) (the FDA issued new guidelines on dissemination of articles in 2009); “Guidance for Industry Good Reprint Practices for the Distribution of Medical Journal Articles and Medical or Scientific Reference Publications on Unapproved New Uses of Approved Drugs and Approved or Cleared Medical Devices,” Federal Register 74, no. 8 (2009): 1694–1695.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General, Draft OLG Compliance Program (2002), at 62057–62067; Chimonas, S. and Rothman, D. J., “New Federal Guidelines for Physician-Pharmaceutical Industry Relations: The Politics of Policy Formation,” Health Affairs 24, no. 4 (2005): 949–960 (AMA comments on the draft, submitted by Maves, Michael, Executive Vice President, obtained via FOIA).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See, for example, American Association of Electro-diagnostic Medicine, Comment No. 55, American College of Rheumatology, American College of Chest Physicians, Comment No. 87, the Endocrine Society, Comment No. 106.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General, “Compliance Program Guidance for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers,” Federal Register 68, no. 86 (2003).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General, “Compliance Program Guidance,” Federal Register 68, no. 86 (2003).Google Scholar
Standard 3.2.Google Scholar
Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education, Updated Standards for Commercial Support: With Bach-ground Rationale and Answers to Questions about Compliance, Chicago, 2004); Steinbrook, R., “Commercial Support and Continuing Medical Education,” New England Journal of Medicine 352, no. 6 (2005): 534–535.Google Scholar
Letter from Max Baucus, Chair, Senate Finance Committee, to Murray Kopelow, ACCME, April 27, 2007, available at <http://www.accme.org/dir_docs/doc_upload/ac633f55-2802-4fc5-a7cb-a55dcdlce4b7_uploaddocument.pdf> (last visted October 8, 20010; Senate Committee on Finance, 110th Cong., 1st Sess, Use of Educational Grants by Pharmaceutical Manufacturers, Washington, D.C., April 2007, at Prt. 110–21, available at <http://www.arbo.org/cope/SCF%20report%20june%202005.pdf> (last visited October 8, 2010).+(last+visted+October+8,+20010;+Senate+Committee+on+Finance,+110th+Cong.,+1st+Sess,+Use+of+Educational+Grants+by+Pharmaceutical+Manufacturers,+Washington,+D.C.,+April+2007,+at+Prt.+110–21,+available+at++(last+visited+October+8,+2010).>Google Scholar
Letter from Murray Kopelow, Chief Executive of ACCME to Max Bucus and Charles Grassley, Senate Committee on Finance, August 3, 2007, available at <http://www.accme.org/dir_docs/doc_upload/ff745720-2080-496a-bece-2c50b09d4c7c_uploaddocument.pdf> (last visited September 30, 2010); see also, ACCME “Announcements,” August 24, 2007, available at <http://accme.org/index.cfm/fa/news.detail/news_id/3605f21a-302a-40d1-ab4d-3ceb88087b1a.cfm> (last visited September 30, 2010).+(last+visited+September+30,+2010);+see+also,+ACCME+“Announcements,”+August+24,+2007,+available+at++(last+visited+September+30,+2010).>Google Scholar
The ACCME made this clear in its response to frequently asked questions on line, see, ACCME response to frequently asked questions regarding commercial support and independence, available at <http://www.accme.org/index.cfm/fa/faq.detail/category_id/667b72cf-6277-4317-99f9–1e476b621e76.cfm> (last visited September 30, 2010). However, the ACCME did not change its standards for commercial support, Standard 3.3., which states only that providers “cannot be required by a commercial interest to accept advice.”+(last+visited+September+30,+2010).+However,+the+ACCME+did+not+change+its+standards+for+commercial+support,+Standard+3.3.,+which+states+only+that+providers+“cannot+be+required+by+a+commercial+interest+to+accept+advice.”>Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine, Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice (Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2009).Google Scholar
AMA, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, CEJA Report–A-09 “Financial Relationships with Industry in Continuing Medical Education” 2009, available at <http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/475/ceja0109.pdf> (last visited September 30, 2010).+(last+visited+September+30,+2010).>Google Scholar
Relman, A. S., “Industry Support of Medical Education,” JAMA 300, no. 9 (2008): 1071–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, L. and Taitsman, J. K., “The Agenda for Continuing Medical Education - Limiting Industry's Influence,” New England Journal of Medicine 361, no. 25 (2009): 2478–2482; Steinbrook, R., “Financial Support of Continuing Medical Education,” JAMA 299, no. 9 (2008): 1060–1062; Institute of Medicine, Redesigning Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 2010, at Chap. 3, “Regulation and Financing,” at 55.78; Association of American Medical Colleges, Industry Funding of Medical Education: Report of an AAMC Task Force, Washington, D.C., 2008, available at <http://www.aamc.org/news-room/pressrel/2008/080619.htm> (last visited September 30, 2010); Campbell, E. G. and Rosenthal, M., “Reform of Continuing Medical Education: Investments in Physician Human Capital,” JAMA 302, no. 16 (2009): 1807–1808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodwin, M. A., “Physicians' Conflicts of Interest: The Limitations of Disclosure,” New England Journal of Medicine 321, no. 20 (1989): 1405–1408; Association of American Medical Colleges, The Scientific Basis of Influence and Reciprocity: A Symposium, Washington, D.C., 2007, at 22–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of American Medical Colleges, Industry Funding of Medical Education, 2008, at viii.Google Scholar
See Relman, (2001), supra note 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassirer, J. P., “Professional Societies and Industry Support: What Is the Quid Pro Quo?” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 50, no. 1 (2007): 7–17; Kassirer, J. P., On the Take: How Medicine's Complicity with Big Business Can Endanger Your Health (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Morris, and Taitsman, , supra note 64, at 280.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. A., Rothman, D. J., and Blank, L. et al., “Health Industry Practices That Create Conflicts of Interest: A Policy Proposal for Academic Medical Centers,” JAMA 295, no. 4 (2006): 429–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education, Accredited CME Is Education That Matters to Patient Care, June 2008, available at <http://www.accme.org/dir_docs/doc_upload/d6b96a50–084c-485b-b71a-6b405b9c07d8_uploaddocument.pdf> (last visited September 30, 2010).+(last+visited+September+30,+2010).>Google Scholar
Morris, L. and Taitsman, J. K., “The Agenda for Continuing Medical Education - Limiting Industry's Influence,” New England Journal of Medicine 361, no. 25 (2009) 2478–2482; Brody, H., Hooked: Ethics, the Medical Profession, and the Pharmaceutical Industry (Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefiled Publishers, Inc., 2007): At 328–330; Angel, M., The Truth About the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What to Do About It (New York: Random House, 2004): At 250–252; Institute of Medicine, Redesigning Continuing Education in the Health Professions, supra note 21, at 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxton, M., “A View from Industry: The Foundations of Future Commercial Support and a Call for Action,” Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 29, no. 1 (2009): 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute of Medicine, Redesigning Continuing Education in the Health Professions, supra note 21, at 73.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Brook, R. H., “Continuing Medical Education: Let the Guessing Begin,” JAMA 303, no. 4 (2010): 359–360; Mazmanian, P. E. and Davis, D. A. “Continuing Medical Education and the Physician as Learners Guide to the Evidence,” JAMA 288, no. 9 (2002): 1057–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Rodwin, , supra note 1.Google Scholar
Senate investigations found that pharmaceutical industry net profits after taxes from 1958–1959 were 21 percent. U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly, 1965, 278. Peter Temin analyzed the data from the FTC, SEC, and other studies and concluded that profits after taxes were between 17 percent and 19 percent from 1948 through 1973; see Temin, P., Taking Your Medicine, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980): at 80–82. For other analysis of pharmaceutical industry profits, see Angel, M., The Truth About Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What To Do About It (New York: Random House, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National health spending for 2008 was estimated at $2.4 billion, or about $7,900 per person, based on a July 2008 U.S. population estimate of 303,824,640. See Keehan, S., Sisko, A., and Truffer, C. et al., “Health Spending Projections through 2017: The Baby-Boom Generation Is Coming to Medicare,” Health Affairs 27 (2008): W145–W155, available at <http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/abstract/26/2/w242> (last visited September 30, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar