Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T00:18:32.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Killing and Allowing to Die: Another Look

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Daniel P. Sulmasy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the most important questions in the debate over the morality of euthanasia and assisted suicide is whether an important distinction between killing patients and allowing them to die exists. The U.S. Supreme Court, in rejecting challenges to the constitutionality of laws prohibiting physician-assisted suicide (PAS), explicitly invoked this distinction, but did not explicate or defend it. The Second Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals had previously asserted, also without argument, that no meaningful distinction exists between killing and allowing to die. That court had reasoned that if this were so, it would be discriminatory to allow persons on life support to end their lives by removing such treatment, while those who are not connected to life support would be denied similar access to death.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , Spring 1998 , pp. 55 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Washington v. Glucksberg, 117 S. Ct. 2258 (1997); and Vacco v. Quill, 117 S. Ct. 2293 (1997).Google Scholar
Quill v. Vacco, 80 F.3d. 716 (2d Cir. 1996).Google Scholar
Dworkin, R., “Assisted Suicide: The Philosopher's Brief,” New York Review of Books, Mar. 27, 1997, at 41–47.Google Scholar
See, for example, Rachels, J., The End of Life: Euthanasia and Morality (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986); Brock, D., “Voluntary Active Euthanasia,” Hastings Center Report, 22, no. 2 (1992): 10–22; Kuhse, H., The Sanctity of Life Principle in Medicine: A Critique (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987); Brody, H., “Assisted Death—A Compassionate Response to Medical Failure,” N. Engl. J. Med., 327 (1992): 1384–88; Lowey, E.H., “Healing and Killing, Harming and Not Harming,” Journal of Clinical Ethics, 3 (1992): 29-34; and Meier, D., “Physician-Assisted Dying: Theory and Reality,” Journal of Clinical Ethics, 3 (1992): 35-37.Google Scholar
See Brock, , supra note 4, at 12.Google Scholar
See, for example, Quill, T.E. Dresser, R. Brock, D.W., “The Rule of Double Effect—A Critique of Its Role in End-of-Life Decision Making,” N. Engl. J. Med., 337 (1997): 1768-71; Quill, T.E. Lo, B. Brock, D.W., “Palliative Options of Last Resort: A Comparison of Voluntarily Stopping Eating and Drinking, Terminal Sedation, Physician-Assisted Suicide, and Voluntary Active Euthanasia,” JAMA, 278 (1997): 2099-104; Orentlicher, D., “The Supreme Court and Physician-Assisted Suicide: Rejecting Assisted Suicide but Embracing Euthanasia,” N. Engl. J. Med., 337 (1997): 1236-40; and Lee, M.A., “Legalizing Physician-Assisted Suicide—Views of Physicians in Oregon,” N. Engl. J. Med., 334 (1996): 310–15.Google Scholar
See Cohen, J.S., “Attitudes Towards Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia Among Physicians in Washington State,” N. Engl. J. Med., 331 (1994): 89-94; Shapiro, R.S., “Willingness to Perform Euthanasia: A Survey of Physician Attitudes,” Archives of Internal Medicine, 154 (1994): 575-84; and Bachman, J.G., “Attitudes of Michigan Physicians and the Public Toward Legalized Physician-Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Euthanasia,” N. Engl. J. Med., 334 (1996): 303–09.Google Scholar
See Hippocrates, , “The Hippocratic Oath: Text, Translation, and Interpretation,” in Temkin, O. Temkin, C.L., eds., and Edelstein, L., trans., Ancient Medicine: Selected Papers of Ludwig Edelstein (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1967): 3–63.Google Scholar
See Hippocrates, , “The Art,” in Jones, W.H.S., trans., Hippocrates II (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1972): 193.Google Scholar
See Waxman, S., “The Dutch Way of Death,” Washington Post, Jan. 31, 1995, at B1, B3.Google Scholar
See van der Maas, P.J., “Euthanasia and Other Medical Decisions Concerning the End of Life,” Lancet, 338 (1991): 669–74.Google Scholar
See van der Maas, P.J., “Euthanasia, Physician-Assisted Suicide, and Other Medical Practices Involving the End of Life in the Netherlands: 1990–1995,” N. Engl. J. Med., 335 (1996): 1699–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See “Departing Prosecutor Charges Dr. Kevorkian in 10 Deaths,” American Medical News, Nov. 18, 1996, at 71.Google Scholar
See Gianelli, D., “Euthanasia Measures Fail, But Backers Vow Renewed Push,” American Medical News, Nov. 20/30, 1992, at 42–43.Google Scholar
See Eagan, T., “In Oregon, Opening a New Front in the World of Medicine,” New York Times, Nov. 6, 1997, at A26.Google Scholar
Lee v. Oregon, No. 95-35804, 1997 WL 80783 (9th Cir. Feb. 27, 1997).Google Scholar
See Steinbock, B. Norcross, A., eds., Killing and Letting Die (New York: Fordham University Press, 2nd ed., 1994); and Sulmasy, D.P., Killing and Allowing to Die (1995) Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University (on file with UMI Dissertation Services No. 9608827).Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T.L., “Introduction,” in Intending Death: The Ethics of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia (Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1996): At 7.Google Scholar
Rachels, , supra note 4, at 112.Google Scholar
See Brock, , supra note 4.Google Scholar
See Gaylin, W., “Doctors Must Not Kill,” JAMA, 259 (1988): 2139–40.Google Scholar
See Beauchamp, , supra note 18, at 7.Google Scholar
See Bennett, J., “Whatever the Consequences,” Analysis, 26 (1966): 83–102.Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
Some suggest that the patient in physician-assisted suicide is acting in self-defense, but this is a specious argument. In claiming self-defense, one is justified in killing another person only if that person threatens one's existence. Cancer or AIDS may be threats to my existence, and I am justified in defending my existence against these illnesses. But it is at best awkward to claim that I can justify killing myself because I am a threat to myself.Google Scholar
See Sapira, J.D., The Art and Science of Bedside Diagnosis (Baltimore: Urban and Schwartzenberg, 1990): At 130.Google Scholar
See Sulmasy, D.P., “Managed Care and Managed Death,” Archives of Internal Medicine, 155 (1995): 133–36.Google Scholar
See, for example, Quill, T.E., “The Ambiguity of Clinical Intentions,” N. Engl. J. Med., 329 (1993): 1039–40; and Brody, H., “Causing, Intending, and Assisting Death,” Journal of Clinical Ethics, 4 (1993): 112–17.Google Scholar
See, for example, Donagan, A., Choice: The Essential Element in Human Action (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1989): At 40–41, 51; Brand, M., Intending and Acting (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1984): At 94–97, 122–26; Bratman, M., Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987): At 1–22, 37, 60, 141; Searle, J., Intentionally: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983): At 7–10, 35–36, 103–05; and Gustafsen, D., Intention and Agency (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1986): At 44, 68.Google Scholar
See Bratman, , id. at 4–5, 110.Google Scholar
See Steinbock, B., “The Intentional Termination of Life,” in Steinbock, Norcross, , supra note 17, at 120–30.Google Scholar
See Gert, B. Bernat, J.L. Mogielnicki, R.P., “Distinguishing Between Patients' Refusals and Requests,” Hastings Center Report, 24, no. 4 (1994): 13–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Kaveny, M.C., “Assisted Suicide, Euthanasia, and the Law,” Theological Studies, 58 (1997): 124–48.Google Scholar
See Dworkin, , supra note 3; and Quill, Dresser, Brock, , supra note 6.Google Scholar
This was the view of Peter Abelard, but few others have based their evaluation of the morality of actions solely on intentions.Google Scholar
See Callahan, D., “When Self-Determination Runs Amok,” Hastings Center Report, 22, no. 2 (1992): 52–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Sulmasy, D.P., “Death and Human Dignity,” Linacre Quarterly, 61 (Dec. 1994): 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I., “The Metaphysics of Morals, Part II: The Metaphysical Principles of Virtue,” in Ellington, J.W., trans., Kant: Ethical Philosophy (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1983): At 127, Ak 462.Google Scholar
See Singer, P.A. Siegler, M., “Euthanasia: A Critique,” N. Engl. J. Med., 322 (1990): 1881–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Lonergan, B.J.F., “Common Sense as Intellectual,” in Insight: A Study of Human Understanding (San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1958): 173–81.Google Scholar