Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:41:21.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What is Really at Stake in Baby K? A Response to Ellen Flannery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Ellen Wright Clayton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentary
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , Spring 1995 , pp. 13 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Smith, S., “The Critical Condition of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act: A Proposed Amendment to the Act after In the Matter of Baby K,” Vanderbilt Law Review, 48 (1995): In press.Google Scholar
442 U.S. 584, 99 S. Ct. 1493 (1979).Google Scholar
Id., at 602, 99 S. Ct. at 2504.Google Scholar
“Hospital Fights Parents’ Wishes to Keep Life Support for a ‘Brain Dead’ Child,” New York Times, Feb. 12, 1994, at 6.Google Scholar