Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:16:35.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cognitive linguistics and word meaning: Taylor on linguistic categorization1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

D. A. Cruse
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Manchester,Manchester M13 gPLUK

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bickerton, D. (1981). Roots of language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Chaffin, R. (forthcoming). The concept of a semantic relation. In Kittay, E. & Lehrer, A. J. (eds) Frames, fields and contexts, to be published by Lawrence Erlbaum, New York.Google Scholar
Coleman, L. & Kay, P. (1981). Prototype semantics: the English word lie. Lg 57. 2644.Google Scholar
Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cruse, D. A. (1990). Prototype theory and lexical semantics. In Tsohatzidis, S. L. (ed.) Meanings and prototypes: studies in linguistic categorization. London: Routledge. 382402.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D. (1989). Introduction: prospects and problems of prototype theory. Linguistics 27. 587612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1973). The boundaries of words and their meanings. In Bailey, C.-J. N. & Shuy, R. W. (eds) New ways of analysing variation in English. Washington: Georgetown University Press. 340373.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. CLS 8. 183228.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1963). Structural semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLaury, R. E. (1987). Coextensive semantic ranges: different names for distinct vantages of one category. CLS 23. 268282.Google Scholar
Mel'čuk, I. & Zholkovsky, A. (1988). The explanatory combinatorial dictionary. In Evens, M. W. (ed.) Relational models of the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 4174.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976). Language and perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osherson, D. N. & Smith, E. E. (1981). On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts. Cognition 9. 3558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pulman, S. G. (1983). Word meaning and belief. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 7. 328350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104. 192233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E. & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7. 573605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (1989). Prototypes, schemas and cross-category correspondences: the case of ask. Linguistics 27. 613662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandeloise, C. (1990). Representation, prototypes and centrality. In Tsohatzidis, S. L. (ed.) Meanings and prototypes. London: Routledge. 403437.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1985). Lexicography and conceptual analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar