Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:45:10.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comprehension and production in language acquisition1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Ruth Clark ,
Sandy Hutcheson  and
Paul Van Buren
Ruth Clark
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Edinburgh
Sandy Hutcheson
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Edinburgh
Paul Van Buren
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Susan Ervin-Tripp has remarked that she ‘would like to see more done on the comprehension side of development,’ and that ‘this is something that we are still in very serions ignorance about’ (1971). Despite this ignorance it seems to be a widely held view that comprehension develops in advance of production, but the authors feel that this whole question is in need of close analysis.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , March 1974 , pp. 39 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Annett, J. (1969). Feedback and human behaviour. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1970). Langnage development, form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1971). Why not pivot grammar? JSHD 36. 40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. (1970). The acquisition of language in infant and child. In Reed, C. E. (ed.), Learning of language. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Brown, R. & Bellugi, U. (1964). Three processes in the child's acquisition of syntax. Harvard Educational Review 34. 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cazden, C. (1965). Environmental assistance to the child's acquisition of grammar. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Harvard.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1971). On the acquisition of the meaning of before and after. JVLVB 10. 266–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. (forthcoming). Adult theories, child strategies and their implications for the language teacher. In Allen, J. P. B. & Corder, S. P. (eds), Papers in applied lingiiistics: Edinburgh course in applied lingitistics. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, M. (1966). Discussion of The creation of language by children. In levons, J. & Wales, R. (eds), Psycholinguistic papers. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, M. & Balfour, G. (1968). Less is more: a study of language comprehension in children. BJPsych 59. 461–471.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of a theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ervin, S. (1964). Imitation and structural change in children's language. In Lenneberg, E. (ed.), New directions in the stndy of language. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1971). Discussion. In Huxley, R. & Ingram, E. (eds), Language acquisition, models and methods. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. T. (eds), Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1966). How to learn to talk: some simple ways. In Smith, F. & Miller, G. A. (eds), The genesis of language. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, C., Bellugi, U. & Brown, R. (1963). Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension and production. JVLVB 2. 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, H. & Opper, S. (1969). Piaget's theory of intellectual development: an introduction. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gruber, J. S. (1967). Topicalization in child language. FL 3. 37–65.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Eisenberg, K. & Strauss, S. (1968). Comprehension: relation between perceived actor and logical subject. JVLVB 7. 527–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, J. & Strauss, S. (1968). Comprehension and a statement's relation to the situation it describes. JVLVB 7. 300–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, J. & Hutcheson, S. (eds) (1972). Communication in face to face interaction. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Leopold, W. (1939–1949). Speech development of a bilingual child. Grammar and general problems in the first two years. Northwestern University Studies in the Humanities.Google Scholar
Maccoby, E. E. & Bee, H. L. (1965). Some speculations concerning the lag between perceiving and performing. Child Development 36. 367–377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A. (1966). Psychology, the science of mental life. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Sinclair, H. (1971). Sensorimotor action patterns as a condition for the acquisition of syntax. In Huxley, R. & Ingram, E. (eds), Language acquisition, models and methods. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. & Welsh, C. A. (1968). Elicited imitation as a research tool in developmental psycholinguistics. Language Behaviour Research Laboratory, Working Paper 10. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Weir, R. H. (1962). Language in the crib. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Williams, F. & Naremore, R. C. (1969). Social class differences in children's syntactic performance: a quantitative analysis of field study data. JSHR 12. 778–793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed