Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:20:31.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Embedded clause reduction and Scandinavian gender agreement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Jan Terje Faarlund
Jan Terje Faarlund
Affiliation:
Nordisk Institutt, University of Trondheim
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The impetus for this paper is a curious case of gender disagreement in Scandinavian, whereby the rule assigning gender agreement to predicate adjectives is apparently violated. An analysis of the facts is provided, and it is shown that other semantico-syntactic phenomena of Scandinavian can be handled within the same explanatory framework.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , September 1977 , pp. 239 - 257
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beckman, N. (1904). Svensk språklära. Stockholm: Bonnier.Google Scholar
Diderichsen, P. (1957). Elementær Dansk Grammatikk. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Faarlund, J. T. (1974). Preposisjonsuttrykk innledet av med i moderne norsk. Norwegian Journal of Linguistics 28. 45–62.Google Scholar
Faarlund, J. T. (1976). Sentential subject and adjectival predicate in Norwegian. Norwegian Journal of Linguistics 30. 13–24.Google Scholar
Hansen, E. (1971). Jensen er nede i postkassen med et brev. Konstruktioner med consubjectum i moderne dansk. DS 5–36.Google Scholar
Hiilos, H. (1967). Ǎrter är gott. SNoF 56. 9–22.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1976). Semantic representations and the linguistic relativity hypothesis. FL 14. 307–357.Google Scholar
Mikkelsen, K. (1911). Dansk Ordfejningslære. Copenhagen: Lehman og Stages Forlag.Google Scholar
Teleman, U. (1965). Svenskans genus-morfem. Arkiv 80 217–230.Google Scholar
Wellander, E. (1948). Riktig svenska. Stockholm: Norstedt.Google Scholar
Wellander, E. (1955). Ärter är gott och liknande inkongruenta satstyper. NsvS 35. 1–47.Google Scholar
Western, A. (1920). Norsk riksmålsgrammatikk. Kristiania: Aschehaug.Google Scholar
Widmark, G. (1966a). Den inkongruenta neutrala predikatsfyllnaden och dess plats i svenskans genussystem. NsvS 46. 91–134.Google Scholar
Widmark, G. (1966b). Är färsk sill god eller gott? Språkvård, 2. 3–6.Google Scholar