Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:32:14.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical morphology. (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 17.) The Hague: Mouton, 1980. Pp. xiv + 476.

Review products

Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical morphology. (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 17.) The Hague: Mouton, 1980. Pp. xiv + 476.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Andrew Carstairs
Andrew Carstairs
Affiliation:
Department of EnglishUniversity of Canterbury, Christchurch I, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , September 1982 , pp. 486 - 492
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Best, K.-H. (1973). Probleme der Analogie-Forschung. Munich: Hueber.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1978). Genitive-accusatives in Slavic: the rules and their motivation. In Comrie, B. (ed.), Classfication of grammatical categories. Edmonton: Linguistic Research Inc. 27–42.Google Scholar
Corbett, G. G. (1981). Syntactic features. JL 17. 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U. (1977). Grundfragen der Morphonologie. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Fisiak, J. (ed.)(1978). Recent developments in historical phonology. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. (1971). Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: an archaeologist's field-trip. Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 394–415.Google Scholar
Hale, K. (1973). Deep-surface canonical disparities in relation to analysis and change: an Australian example. In Sebeok, T. A. (ed), Current trends in linguistics. vol. II. The Hague: Mouton. 401–458.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1974). Morphologization of phonological rules: an example from Chicano Spanish. In Campbell, R. J., Goldin, M. G. & Wang, M. C. (eds.), Linguistic studies in romance languages. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 8–27.Google Scholar
Hooper, J. B. (1976). Introduction to natural generative phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Robins, R. H. (1958). The Yurok language. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rycroft, D. & Ngcobo, A. B. (1979). Say it in Zulu. Unpublished teaching material available from the School of Oriental and African Studies, London. To be published by the University of Natal.Google Scholar