Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T20:51:45.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Passive se in Romanian and Spanish: A subject cycle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2017

JONATHAN E. MACDONALD  and
MATTHEW L. MADDOX
JONATHAN E. MACDONALD*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
MATTHEW L. MADDOX*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign & Southeast Community College – Nebraska
*
Author’s address: Department of Linguistics/Spanish & Portuguese, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 4080 Foreign Language Building, 707 S Mathews Avenue, MC-168, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
Author’s address: Department of Linguistics/Spanish & Portuguese, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 4080 Foreign Language Building, 707 S Mathews Avenue, MC-168, Urbana, IL 61801, USAmmaddox2@illinois.edu & Division of Arts & SciencesSoutheast Community College-Nebraska, 1111 O Street, Suite 112, Lincoln, NE 68508, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, we discuss passive se constructions in Romanian and Spanish. We argue that there is a projected implicit external argument in passive se constructions in both languages based on an available inalienable possession interpretation of body parts. These constructions, however, differ from each other in one important way: Romanian passive se allows a ‘by’-phrase, while Spanish passive se shows severe restrictions. Moreover, we illustrate that in Old Spanish, passive se freely allowed ‘by’-phrases. Thus, Modern Romanian reflects an earlier stage of Spanish. We propose a linguistic cycle to explain these differences, where Spanish and Romanian are at different stages of that cycle. The approach offers an explanation for a general pattern within Romance, where ‘by’-phrases are initially grammatical with passive se, but then become ungrammatical over time, a pattern to date that has not yet been explained. It also offers a thereotical account for why some languages do not develop passive se constructions.

Keywords

body parts‘by’-phraseslinguistic cyclesModern Spanishpassive seOld SpanishRomanian
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , 01 April 2018 , pp. 389 - 427
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[1]

We would like to thank Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin, José Ignacio Hualde, Javier Irigoyen, Monica-Alexandrina Irimia, Catherine Johnson, Iván Ortega-Santos, Charlotte Prieu, Oana Savescu, Florian Schäfer, Jessica Serrano, Laura Spinu, as well as audiences at the 45th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL) and the 2016 Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (HLS) for data and discussion. We would also like to thank the three Journal of Linguistics anonymous referees for their insightful feedback on several parts of this article. All errors, of course, are our own.

References

PRIMARY SOURCES

Anonymous. 1207. Poema de Mio Cid. Colin Smith (ed.), 1972. Ediciones Cátedra. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1215. Vida de Santa María Egipcíaca. R. Foulché-Delbosc (ed.), 1907. Vida de Santa María Egipciaqua. Edición conforme al códice Escorial. Barcelona, L’Avenç.Google Scholar
Anonymous. Fuero General de Navarra. 1238. Pabo Ilarregui & D. Segundo LaPuerta (eds.), 1869. Pamplona: Imprenta Provincial.Google Scholar
Anonymous. Libro de Alexandre. 1240–1250. http://www.cervantesvirtual.com/servlet/SirveObras/06927218700692762979079/index.htm.Google Scholar
Vidal de Canellas. 1247–1252. Vidal Mayor. Antonio Ubieto Arteta (ed.), 1989. Estudios Huesca: Instituto de Estudios Altoaragoneses.Google Scholar
Abū al-Wafā al-Mubashshir ibn Fatik. 1250. Bocados de Oro. Mechthild Crombach (ed.), 1971. Bonn: Romanisches Seminar der Universität Bonn.Google Scholar
Anonymous. Libro de Apolonio. 1250. http://www.cervantesvirtual.com/servlet/SirveObras/02472796434025507976613/p0000001.htm#I_0_.Google Scholar
Anonymous. Poema de Fernán Gonzelez. 1250–1266. C. Caroll Marden (ed.), 1904. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1251. Calila e Dimna. http://www.ciudadseva.com/textos/cuentos/otras/calila/calila-i.htm.Google Scholar
Alfonso X. Setenario. 1252–1270. Kenneth H. Vanderford (ed.), 1945. Buenos Aires: Instituto de filología.Google Scholar
Aly ben Ragel. 1254. Libro complido de los judizios de las estrellas. P. Sánchez-Prieto Borja, Rocío Díaz Moreno & Elena Trujillo Belso, Edición de textos alfonsíes en REAL ACADEMIA ESPAÑOLA: Banco de datos (CORDE) [en línea]. http://www.rae.es.Google Scholar
Alfonso X. 1260. Espéculo. In Joaquín Francisco Pacheco, Fermín de la Puente y Apezechea, Pedro Gómez de la Sema, Francesco de Paul Díaz y Mendoza & Gregorio López (eds.), Los codigos españoles concordados y anotados. Madrid: M. Rivadeneyra.Google Scholar
Gonzalo de Berceo. 1260. Los Milagros de Nuestra Señora. Michael Gerli (ed.), 2010. Ediciones Cátedra. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alfonso X. 1260–1274. La estória de los siete infantes de Lara: Aus der Crónica general de España. Wilhelm Holland (ed.), 1860. Tübingen: Gedruckt bei H. Laupp.Google Scholar
Alfonso X. 1270. General Estoria. Antonio G. Solalinde (ed.), 1930. Madrid: J. Molina.Google Scholar
Juan Manuel. 1335. El Conde Lucanor. Eduardo Juliá (ed.), 1933. Madrid: Librería General de V. Suárez.Google Scholar
Juan Fernández de Heredia. 1370. Rams de Flores o Libro de Actoridades. Conrado Guardiola Alcover (ed.), 1998. Zaragoza: Institución Fernando el Católico.Google Scholar
Enrique de Villena. 1423. Arte Cisoria. Biblioteca Universal. http://www.biblioteca.org.ar/libros/130282.pdf.Google Scholar
Cristóbal de Castillejo. 1490–1550. Obra de Amores. In Adolfo Castro (ed.), Poetas Líricos de los siglos XVI y XVII, 1903. Madrid: M. Rivadeneyra.Google Scholar
Garci Rodríguez de Montalvo. 1510. Las Sergas de Esplandián. Salvardor Bernabeu Albert (ed.), 1998. Aranjuez (Madrid): Doce Calles.Google Scholar
Garci Rodríguez de Montalvo. 1533. Amadís de Gaula. Rodríguez de Montalvo, Garci Place, Edwin Bray. (1962–71; v. 2, 1962). Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Instituto ‘Miguel de Cervantes’.Google Scholar

REFERENCES

Adams, J. N. 2013. Social variation and the Latin language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Adger, David. 2003. Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Schäfer, Florian. 2006. The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. In Frascarelli, Mara (ed.), Phases of interpretation, 187–212. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Schäfer, Florian. 2015. External arguments in transitivity alternations: A layering approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Grant. 2013. Agentive reflexive clitics and transitive seconstructions in Spanish. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 2(2), 81–128.Google Scholar
Authier, J.-Marc & Reed, Lisa. 1996. On the Canadian French middle. Linguistic Inquiry 27.3, 513–523.Google Scholar
Barbosa, Pilar. 1993. Clitic placement in Old Romance and Euopean Portuguese. Chicago Linguistics Society (CLS) 29.1, 33–59.Google Scholar
Barbosa, Pilar. 1996. Clitic placement in European Portuguese and the position of subjects. In Halpern, Aaron L. & Zwicky, Arnold M. (eds.), Second position clitics and related phenomena, 1–40. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Basilico, David. 2010. The seclitic and its relationship to paths. Probus 22, 271–302.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 1982. ‘Morphological’ passive and pro-drop: The impersonal construction in Italian. Journal of Linguistic Research 2, 1–34.Google Scholar
Benito Moreno, Carlota. 2015. Pero se escondíamos como las ratas: Syncretism in the reflexive paradigm in Spanish and Catalan. Isoglosas 1.1, 95–127.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa, Holmberg, Anders, Roberts, Ian & Sheehan, Michelle (eds.). 2010. Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bogard, Sergio. 2006. El Clítico se. Valores y evolución [The seclitic: Values and evolution]. In Concepción Company Company (ed.), Sintáxis histórica de la lengua espanõla [Historical syntax of the Spanish language], vol. 1, 755–874. México: UNA de México.Google Scholar
Börjars, Kersti, Harries, Pauline & Vincent, Nigel. 2016. Growing syntax: The development of a DP in North Germanic. Language 92.2, e1–e37. doi:10.1353/lan.2016.0002.Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio & Demonte, Violeta (eds.). 1999. Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española [Descriptive grammar of the Spanish language], 3 vols. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin. 2013. By-phrases in passives and nominals. Syntax 16.1, 1–41.Google Scholar
Cennamo, Michela. 1993. The reanalysis of reflexives: A diachronic perspective. Napoli: Liguori Editore.Google Scholar
Cennamo, Michela. 1999. Late Latin pleonastic reflexives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Transactions of the Philological Society 97, 103–150.Google Scholar
Cennamo, Michela, Eythórsson, Thórhallur & Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2015. Semantic and (morpho)syntactic constraints on anticausativization: Evidence from Latin and Old Norse-Icelandic. Linguistics 53, 677–729.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Martin, Roger & Michaels, David (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honer of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra & Ladusaw, William A.. 2004. Restriction and saturation. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1988. On siconstructions and the theory of arb . Linguistic Inquiry 19.4, 521–581.Google Scholar
Cornilescu, Alexandra & Nicolae, Alexandru. 2015. The grammaticalization of passive reflexive constructions in Romanian. In Pană Dindelegan, Gabriela, Zafiu, Rodica, Dragomirescu, Adina, Nicula, Irina, Nicolae, Alexandru & Esher, Louise (eds.), Diachronic variation in Romanian, 309–362. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Cuervo, María C.2003. Datives at large. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Cuervo, María C. 2014. Alternating unaccusatives and distribution of roots. Lingua 141, 48–70.Google Scholar
D’Alessandro, Roberta. 2007. Impersonal si constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
De Miguel Aparicio, Elena. 1992. El aspecto en la sintaxis del español: perfectividad e impersonalidad[Aspect in Spanish syntax: Perfectivity and impersonality]. Ph.D. dissertation, Autonomous University of Madrid.Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 1998. Impersonal seconstructions in Romance and the passivization of unergatives. Linguistic Inquiry 29.3, 399–437.Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 2006. The seanaphor and its role in argument realization. In Everaert, Martin & van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. 4, 118–179. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dragomirescu, Adina. 2013. Passive and impersonal constructions: ‘By’-phrases. In Pană Dindelegan, Gabriela (ed.), The grammar of Romanian, 169–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Faltz, Leonard M.1977. Reflexivization: A study in universal syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Faltz, Leonard M.2008. A reflexive cycle? Presented at Linguistic Cycles Workshop, Tempe, AZ.Google Scholar
Folli, Raffaella & Harley, Heidi. 2005. Consuming results in Italian and English: Flavors of v. In Kempchinsky, Paula & Slabakova, Roumyana (eds.), Syntax, semantics, and acquisition of aspect, 95–120. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Fontana, Josep. 1993. Phrase structure and the syntax of clitics in the history of Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, University Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Fontana, Josep. 1997. On the integration of second position phenomena. In van Kemenade & Vincent(eds.), 207–249.Google Scholar
Fornaciari, Raffaello. 1884. Sintassi Italiano dell’uso Moderno [Italian syntax of modern usage]. Florence: G.C. Sansani.Google Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van. 2001. The Force of ForceP in English. South West Journal of Linguistics 20, 107–120.Google Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van. 2004. Grammaticalization as economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van. 2011. The linguistic cycle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geniušienė, Emma. 1987. Typology of reflexives. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Guéron, Jacqueline. 1985. Inalienable possession, PRO-inclusion and lexical chains. In Guéron, Jacqueline, Obenauer, Hans-Georg & Pollock, Jean-Yves (eds.), Grammatical representation, 43–86. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Guéron, Jacqueline. 2006. Inalienable possession. In Everaert, Martin, van Riemsdijk, Henk, Goedemans, Rob & Hollebrandse, Bart (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. 2, 589–638. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Halpern, Aaron. 1995. On the placement and morphology of clitics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Halpern, Aaron & Fontana, Josep. 1994. X $^{0}$ clitics and X $^{\text{max}}$ clitics. West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 12, 255–266.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2013. External arguments and the mirror principle: On the distinctness of Voice and v. Lingua 125, 34–57.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1990. The grammaticization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14, 25–71.Google Scholar
Heidinger, Steffen & Schäfer, Florian. 2010. The French reflexive passive and anticausative: A diachronic view from the par phrase. In Fagard, Benjamin, Prevost, Sophie, Combettes, Bernard & Bertrand, Olivier (eds.), Etudes de linguistique diachronique, 135–152. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2010. The null generic subject pronoun in Finnish: A case of incorporation in T. In Biberauer et al. (eds.), 88–124.Google Scholar
Kärde, Sven. 1943. Quelque Manières D’Exprimer L’Idée d’un Sujet Indéterminé ou Général en Espagnol. Uppsala: Appelbergs Boktryckeriaktiebolag.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 2000. Parameters and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne. 1988. The middle voice: A typological and diachronic study. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Kempchinsky, Paula. 2004. Romance SE as an aspectual element. In J. Clancy Clements, Julie Auger & Vance, Barbara (eds.), Contemporary approaches to Romance linguistics, 239–256. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Koontz-Garboden, Andrew. 2009. Anticausativization. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27.1, 77–138.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2010. The explicit syntax of implicit arguments. Linguistic Inquiry 41.3, 357–388.Google Scholar
Legate, Julie A. 2014. Voice and v: Lessons from Acehnese. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax–lexical semantics interface (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 26), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 25.4, 609–665.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Jonathan E.An implicit projected argument in Spanish impersonal and passive se constructions. Syntax, doi:10.1111/synt.12146. Published online 23 October 2017.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Jonathan E., Maddox, Matthew L. & Moran, Grace. 2017. Null subjects and se constructions. Ms., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Maddox, Matthew L.2016. The grammaticalization of se from Latin to Spanish and the Object Agreement cycle. Presented at the Workshop on Romance SE/SI at the University of Wisconsin–Madison.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Matushanksy, Ora. 2006. Head Movement in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 37, 69–109.Google Scholar
McGinnis, Martha. 2004. Lethal ambiguity. Linguistic Inquiry 35.1, 47–95.Google Scholar
Manoliu-Manea, Mari. 1996. Inalienability and topicality in Romanian: Pragmasemantics of syntax. In Chappell, Hillary & McGregor, William (eds.), The grammar of inalienability: A typological perspective on body part terms and the body–whole relation, 711–743. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mendeloff, Henry. 1964. The passive voice in Old Spanish. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 15, 269–287.Google Scholar
Mendikoetxea, Amaya. 1992. On the nature of agreement: The syntax of Arbse in Spanish. Ph.D. thesis, University of York.Google Scholar
Mendikoetxea, Amaya. 1999a. Construcciones inacusativas y pasivas [Unaccusative and passive constructions]. In Bosque & Demonte(eds.), vol. 2, 1575–1630.Google Scholar
Mendikoetxea, Amaya. 1999b. Construcciones con se: Medias, Pasivas e Impersonales [Seconstructions: Middle, passive and impersonal]. In Bosque & Demonte (eds.), vol. 2, 1631–1722.Google Scholar
Mendikoetxea, Amaya. 2008. Clitic impersonal constructions in Romance: Syntactic features and semantic interpretation. In Siewierska, Aanna (ed.), Impersonal constructions in grammatical theory, 290–336. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mendikoetxea, Amaya & Battye, Adrian. 2002. Arb se/si in transitive contexts: A comparative study. Rivista di grammatica generativa 15, 161–195.Google Scholar
Monge, Félix. 1954. Las frases pronominales de sentido impersonal en español [Pronominal phrases with impersonal interpretation in Spanish]. Archivo de Filología Aragonesa 7, 7–102.Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon. 2010. On deriving CED effects from the PIC. Linguistic Inquiry 41.1, 35–82.Google Scholar
Muller, Henri. 1924. The Passive Voice in Vulgar Latin. Romanic Review 15, 68–93.Google Scholar
Nakamoto, Takeshi. 2010. Inalienable possession constructions in French. Lingua 120, 74–102.Google Scholar
Naro, Anthony. 1976. The genesis of the reflexive impersonal in Portuguese: A study in syntactic change as a surface phenomenon. Language 52.4, 779–810.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew. 2007. The representation of third person and its consequences for person–case effects. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25, 273–313.Google Scholar
Nunes, Jairo. 2001. Sideward movment. Linguistic Inquiry 32, 303–344.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco & Treviño, Esthela. 2011. Impersonals with passive morphology. In Ortiz-López, Luis A. (ed.), Hispanic Linguistics Symposium 13, 314–324. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Otero, Carlos P. 1986. Arbitrary subjects in finite clauses. In Bordelois, Ivonne, Contreras, Helen & Zagona, Karen (eds.), Generative studies in Spanish syntax, 81–109. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero syntax: Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pieroni, Silva. 2000. Agents in Latin impersonal passives. Mnemosyne 53, 288–301.Google Scholar
Portilla, Mario. 2007. Diacronía de las construcciones con pronombres reflexivos en español [Diachrony of pronominal reflexive constructions in Spanish]. Filología y Lingüística 33, 131–149.Google Scholar
Pountain, Christopher J. 2000. Pragmatic factors in the evolution of the Romance reflexive (with special reference to Spanish). Hispanic Research Journal 1, 5–25.Google Scholar
Pujalte, Mercedes & Saab, Andres. 2012. Syncretism as PF-repair: The case of se-insertion in Spanish. In Cuervo, María Cristina & Roberge, Yves (eds.), The end of argument structure? (Syntax and Semantics 38), 229–260. Bingley: Emerald Group.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rivero, M. Luisa. 1986. La tipología de los pronombres átonos en el español medieval y en el español actual [The typology of atonic pronouns in Medieval Spanish and Modern Spanish]. Anuario de la Lingüística Hispánica 2, 197–220.Google Scholar
Rivero, M. Luisa. 1991. Clitic and NP climbing in Old Spanish. In Campos, Héctor & Martínez-Gil, Fernando (eds.), Current studies in Spanish linguistics, 241–282. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Rivero, M. Luisa. 1997. On two locations for complement clitic pronouns: Serbo-Croatian, Bulgarian, and Old Spanish. In van Kemenade & Vincent(eds.), 170–206.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2010. A deletion analysis of null subjects. In Biberauer et al. (eds.), 58–87.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna. 2003. Syntactic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saab, Andres. 2014. Syntax or nothing: Some theoretical and empirical remarks on implicit arguments. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 3.2, 125–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-López, Cristina. 2002. Las construcciones con se [Se consructions]. Madrid: Visor Libros.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Florian. 2008. The syntax of (anti-)causatives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Vincent, Nigel (eds.). 1997. Parameters of morphosyntactic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Werner, Abraham & Leiss, Elisabeth. 2006. Personal and impersonal passives: Definite vs. indefinite diatheses. Transactions of the Philological Society 104, 259–296.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Max, Yates, Alan & Dols, Nicolau. 1999. Catalan: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Woodcock, Eric C. 1959. A new Latin syntax. Oak Park, IL: Bolchazy-Carducci.Google Scholar