Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:51:36.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Paul M. Postal, Aspects of phonological theory. New York: Harper & Row, 1968. Pp. xv + 326.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

E. C. Fudge
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Cambridge.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bierwisch, M. (1968). Two critical problems in accent rules. JL 4. 173178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. (Janua Linguarum, 4). The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1964). Current issues in linguistic theory. (Janua Linguarum, 38). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Fudge, E. C. (1967). The nature of phonological primes. JL 3. 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fudge, E. C. (1969a). Mutation rules and ordering in phonology. JL 5. 2338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FudKe, E. C. (1969b). Syllables. JL 5. 253286.Google Scholar
Fudge, E. C. (1970). Phonological structure and ‘expressiveness’. JL 6. 161188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, M. (1959). The sound pattern of Russian. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1969). Spanish phonology. (MIT Research Monographs, 54). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, E. J. A. (1966). Towards a prosodie statement of Vietnamese syllable structure. In Bazell, C. E. et al. (eds.). In memory of J. R. Firth. 163197. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, L. (1961) (trs. Whitfield, F. J.). Prolegomena to a theory of language. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1965). Sound change. Lg 41. 185205.Google Scholar
Householder, F. W. (1969). Review of R. E. Langacker, Language and its structure. Lg 45. 886897.Google Scholar
Jones, D. (1950). The phoneme. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
Kisseberth, C. W. (1970). On the functional unity of phonological rules. Linguistic inquiry 1. 291306.Google Scholar
Kohler, K. J. (1967). Modern English phonology. Lingua 19. 145176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, S. M. (1964a). The sememic approach to structural semantics. In Romney, A. K. & D'Andrade, R. G. (eds.), Transcultural studies in cognition (AmA 66.3, Part 2) 5778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, S. M. (1964b). On alternation, transformation, realization, and stratification. MSLL 17. 105122.Google Scholar
Lamb, S. M. (1966). Prolegomena to a theory of phonology. Lg, 42. 536573.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1967). Sapir's phonological representation. IJAL 33. 106111Google Scholar
Navarro Tomás, T. (1965). Manual de pronunciación española. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Postal, P. M. (1964a). Boas and the development of phonology. IJAL 30. 269280.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1949). Selected writings of Edward Sapir (ed. Mandelbaum, D. G.). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Šaumjan, S. K. (1967). Phonology and generative grammars. In To honor Roman Jakobson, Vol. 3. 17341744. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Trager, G. L. & Smith, H. L. (1951). Outline of English structure. (Studies in linguistics, Occasional Papers, 3).Google Scholar
Wang, W. S.-Y. (1968). Vowel features, paired variables, and the English vowel shift. Lg 44. 695708.Google Scholar
Zimmer, K. E. (1969). Markedness and the problem of indeterminacy of lexical representations. IJAL 35. 264266.Google Scholar