Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:26:38.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Philip Lieberman, Intonation, Perception, and Language. (Research Monograph No. 38.) Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1967. Pp. xiii + 210.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Ralph Vanderslice
Ralph Vanderslice
Affiliation:
Department of Communication Arts and Sciences, Queens College of the City University of New York, Flushing NY 11367
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 1970 , pp. 138 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bolinger, D. L. (1958). A theory of pitch accent in English. Word 14. 109–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Gunter, R. (1966). On the placement of accent in dialogue: a feature of context grammar. JL 2. 159–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadding-Koch, K. & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1964). An experimental study of some intonation contours. Phonetica 11. 175–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1962). Subglottal activity during speech. Proc. IVth Intern. Congr, Phonetic Sciences, 247–265. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lieberman, P. (1965). On the acoustic basis of the perception of intonation by linguists. Word 21. 40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, P. (1968). Phonologic features and muscular commands, – with particular reference to the larynx. Read at Speech Symposium, Kyoto, August.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. & Hirano, M. (1967). Studies of pitch change in speech. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 7. Pp. 80–84.Google Scholar
Öhman, S. & Lindqvist, J. (1966). Analysis-by-synthesis of prosodic pitch contours. KTH Q Progress & Status Report 4/1965. Pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Trager, G. L. & Smith, H. L. Jr. (1951). An Outline of English Structure. (SIL Occasional Paper 3.) Reprinted Washington, D.C.: ACLS, 1957.Google Scholar
Vanderslice, R. (1967). Larynx vs. lungs: cricothyrometer data refuting some recent claims concerning intonation and ‘archetypality’. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 7. Pp. 69–79.Google Scholar
Vanderslice, R. (1968). Synthetic Elocution: Considerations in Automatic Orthographic-to-Phonetic Conversion of English with Special Reference to Prosodic Features. (UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 8.) University Microfilms Order No. 68–11 887.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1967). On arguing with Mr. Katz: a brief rejoinder. FL 3. 284–287.Google Scholar