Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:27:38.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Polydefinites in Greek: Ellipsis, close apposition and expletive determiners1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2011

MARIKA LEKAKOU  and
KRISZTA SZENDRŐI
MARIKA LEKAKOU*
Affiliation:
Goethe University of Frankfurt
KRISZTA SZENDRŐI*
Affiliation:
University College London
*
Authors' addresses: (Lekakou) Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main, Institüt für Linguistik, Grüneburgplatz 1, D-60629 Frankfurt am Main, Germanylekakou@em.uni-frankfurt.de
(Szendrői) Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University College London, Chandler House, 2 Wakefield Street, London WC1N 1PF, UKk.szendroi@ucl.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greek polydefinites are cases of adjectival modification where the adjective features its own definite determiner. We propose an account of the phenomenon that treats it as an instance of close apposition. Like close appositives, polydefinites in Greek instantiate multiple definite determiners, display a freedom in word order, and involve a restrictive interpretation. We propose that close apposition in Greek forms a complex DP out of two DPs which are in a sisterhood relationship through identification of the Referential roles within the DPs. This operation, semantically tantamount to set intersection, is constrained to apply only when the resulting set is not co-extensive with either initial set. This ensures the restrictive interpretation of one DP over the other. The fact that in polydefinites, it is always the DP containing the adjective that obligatorily satisfies the constraint has to do with the presence of noun ellipsis within that DP: (noun) ellipsis is known to come with a disanaphora requirement. We show that noun ellipsis is also responsible for the distribution of adjectives and adjective interpretations, as well as those discourse effects of polydefinites that have been thought of as the result of a DP-internal Focus projection. Finally, we make a proposal for the encoding of definiteness in Greek, consonant both with the existence of polydefinites in the language and with the prerequisite for set intersection among DPs: the overtly realized Greek definite determiner does not itself contribute an iota operator but preserves the <e,t>denotation at the DP level. Our proposal thus deals not only with the multiple occurrence of definite determiners in a construction that picks out a single discourse referent, but also with the compositionality problem that such a situation gives rise to. In the final part we tie the cross-linguistic (un)availability of expletive determiners of the Greek type to the (un)availability of morphologically realized case.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 107 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[1]

We are grateful to the audiences of the MIT Workshop on Greek Syntax and Semantics, the workshop Atoms and Laws of the Noun Phrase, the 40th Meeting of the North East Linguistics Society, and the participants of the Egg school 2010 in Constanta. We are particularly indebted to Artemis Alexiadou, Hector Campos, Marcel den Dikken, Sabine Iatridou, Alexia Ioannidou, Olaf Koeneman, Luisa Marti, Ad Neeleman, Øystein Nilsen, Melita Stavrou, Jeroen van Craenenbroeck, Hans van de Koot, Reiko Vermeulen, Edwin Williams and Hedde Zeijlstra. The paper has also benefited from the scrutiny of three anonymous JL referees. All errors remain our own. The first author would like to acknowledge that a major part of this work was carried out with the financial support of the European Science Foundation (EURYI grant for the project European Dialect Syntax to Sjef Barbiers).

References

REFERENCES

Ackema, Peter & Neeleman, Ad. 2004. Beyond morphology: Interface conditions on word formation (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acuña-Fariña, Carlos. 2009. Aspects of the grammar of close apposition and the structure of the noun phrase. English Language and Linguistics 13, 453–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2001. Adjective syntax and noun raising: Word order asymmetries in the DP as the result of adjective distribution. Studia Linguistica 55, 217–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2006. On the cross-linguistic distribution of (in)definiteness spreading. Presented at the University of Klagenfurt, December 2006. http://ifla.uni-stuttgart.de/institut/mitarbeiter/artemis/handouts/On%20the%20crosslinguistic%20distribution%20of.pdf (retrieved 10 April 2008).Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Haegeman, Liliane & Melita, Stavrou 2007. Noun phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Wilder, Chris. 1998. Adjectival modification and multiple determiners. In Alexiadou, Artemis & Wilder, Chris (eds.), Possessors, predicates and movement in the DP, 303–332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexopoulou, Dora & Folli, Raffaela. 2010. Indefinite topics and the syntax of nominals in Italian and Greek. In Washburn, Mary Byram, Ouwayda, Sarah, Ouyang, Chuoying, Yin, Bin, Ipek, Canan, Marston, Lisa & Walker, Aaron (eds.), The 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 28) online proceedings, 12 pages. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California. https://sites.google.com/site/wccfl28pro/alexopoulou-folli (retrieved 20 October 2011).Google Scholar
Androutsopoulou, Antonia. 1995. The licensing of adjectival modification. In Camacho, Jose, Choueiri, Lina & Watanabe, Maki (eds.), The 14th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 14), 17–31. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 2005. Lexical categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark & Stewart, Osamuyimen T.. 1999. On double-headedness and the anatomy of the clause. Ms., Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Bittner, Maria & Hale, Ken. 1996. The structural determination of case and agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 27, 1–68.Google Scholar
Branco, Antonio & Costa, Francisco. 2006. Noun ellipsis without empty categories. In Müller, Stefan (ed.), HPSG '06. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel. 2003. On D-trees, beans, and B-accents. Linguistics and Philosophy 26, 511–545.Google Scholar
Campos, Hector & Stavrou, Melita. 2004. Polydefinites in Greek and Aromanian. In Tomic, Olga (ed.), Balkan syntax and semantics, 137–173. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Dehé, Nicole & Kavalova, Yordanka. 2007. Parentheticals: An introduction. In Dehé, Nicole & Kavalova, Yordanka (eds.), Parentheticals, 1–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doron, Edit. 1992. Appositive predicates. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 7, 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doron, Edit. 1994. The discourse function of appositives. Israeli Association of Theoretical Linguistics (IATL) 1, 53–65. Beersheba & Jerusalem: Ben Gurion University of the Negev & Hebrew University of Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Elbourne, Paul. 2005. Situations and individuals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Féry, Caroline & Samek-Lodovici, Vieri. 2006. Discussion notes: Focus projection and prosodic prominence in nested foci. Language 82, 131–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia & Etxeberria, Urtzi. 2010. Definiteness, contextual domain restriction, and quantifier structure: A crosslinguistic perspective. Ms., The University of Chicago & IKER Research Centre for the Basque language and Basque texts/CNRS.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia & Stavrou, Melita. 1999. Nominalization and ellipsis in the Greek DP. The Linguistic Review 16, 295–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana. 1995. A unified structural representation of (abstract) case and articles: Evidence from Germanic. In Haider, Olsen & Vikner, Sten (eds.), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax, 77–93. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew, Gil, David & Comrie, Bernard (eds.). 2005. The world atlas of language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline & Zamparelli, Roberto. 2000. Friends and colleagues: Plurality and NP-coordination. In Hirotani, Masako, Coetzee, Andries W., Hall, Nigel & Kim, Ji-Yung (eds.), The Northeast Linguistics Society (NELS) 30, 341–352. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association (GLSA).Google Scholar
Higginbotham, James. 1985. On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547–593.Google Scholar
Hiraiwa, Ken & Bodomo, Adams. 2008. Object-sharing as symmetric sharing: Evidence from Dàgáárè. In Chang, Charles B. & Haynie, Hannah J. (eds.), The 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 26), 243–251. Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, Payne, John & Peterson, Peter. 2002. Coordination and supplementation. In Huddleston, & Pullum, et al. , 1273–1362.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. et al. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioannidou, Alexia & Dikken, Marcel den. 2009. P-drop, D-drop, D-spread. In Halpert, Claire Danielle, Hartmann, Jeremy & Hill, David (eds.), The 2007 Worskhop in Greek Syntax and Semantics at MIT (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 57), 393–408. Cambridge, MA: Department of Linguistics, MIT.Google Scholar
Karanassios, Georgios. 1992. Syntaxe comparé du groupe nominal en grec moderne et dans d'autres langues [Comparative syntax of the nominal phrase in Modern Greek and other languages]. Ph.D. dissertation, Université Paris VIII, Vincennes.Google Scholar
Kariaeva, Natalia. 2004. Determiner spreading in Modern Greek: Split-DP hypothesis. Ms., Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Kolliakou, Dimitra. 2004. Monadic definites and polydefinites: Their form, meanning and use. Journal of Linguistics 40, 263–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2006. Can focus accenting be eliminated in favor of deaccenting Given constituents? The 9th Symposium on Logic and Language (Besenyőtelek, Hungary), 107–119.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul. 1980. Naming and necessity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1969. On pronominalization and the chain of command. In Reibel, Daniel & Schane, Sanford (eds.), Modern studies in English: Readings in transformational grammar, 160–200. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Lekakou, Marika & Szendrői, Kriszta. 2007. Eliding the noun in close apposition, or Greek polydefinites revisited. UCL Working Papers 19, 129–154.Google Scholar
Lekakou, Marika & Szendrői, Kriszta. 2009. Close apposition with and without noun ellipsis: An analysis of Greek polydefinites. Studies in Greek Linguistics 29, 151–166. Thessaloniki: Institute of Modern Greek Studies.Google Scholar
Lekakou, Marika & Szendrői, Kriszta (in press). The cross-linguistic distribution of polydefinites: Case and expletive determiners. The North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 40.Google Scholar
Leu, Tom. 2007. From Greek to Germanic: Poly(*in)definiteness and weak/strong adjectival inflection. Ms., New York University.Google Scholar
Löbel, Elisabeth. 1994. KP/DP-syntax: Interaction of case-marking with referential and nominal features. Theoretical Linguistics 20, 38–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 25, 609–665.Google Scholar
Manolessou, Io. 2000. Greek noun phrase structure: A study in syntactic evolution. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Marinis, Theodore. 2001. Feature Specification in the Modern Greek DP: Acquiring Reference, Case and Agreement. The 4th International Conference on Greek Linguistics (Nicosia, September 1999), 512–519. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press.Google Scholar
Matushansky, Ora. 2009. On the linguistic complexity of proper names. Linguistics and Philosophy 31, 573–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Szendrői, Kriszta. 2004. Superman sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 35, 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Koot, Hans van der. 2002. The configurational matrix. Linguistic Inquiry 33, 529–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Weerman, Fred. 1998. Flexible syntax: A theory of case and arguments. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Ntelitheos, Dimitrios. 2004. Syntax of elliptical and discontinuous nominals. MA thesis, UCLA.Google Scholar
Öztürk, Balkiz. 2005. Case, referentiality and phrase structure. Amsterdam & New York: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panagiotidis, Phoevos. 2003. Empty nouns. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21, 381–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panagiotidis, Phoevos & Marinis, Thodoris. 2011. Determiner spreading as DP-predication. To appear in Studia Linguistica.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara H. 1986. Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In Groenendijk, Jeroen, Jongh, Dick de & Stockhof, Martin (eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, 115–143. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, John & Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Nouns and noun phrases. In Huddleston, & Pullum, et al. , 323–523.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Torrego, Esther. 2001. T-to-C movement: Causes and consequences. In Kenstowicz, Michael (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 355–426. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2005. The logic of conventional implicature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ralli, Angela. 1992. Compounds in Modern Greek. Rivista di Linguistica 4, 143–174.Google Scholar
Ralli, Angela & Stavrou, Melita. 1998. Morphology–syntax interface: A–N compounds vs. A–N constructs in Modern Greek. In Booij, Geert & Marle, Jaap van (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1997, 243–264. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 2006. Interface strategies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Craige. 1996. Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. In Jae-HakYoon, & Kathol, Andreas (eds.), Papers in semantics (OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 49), 91–136. Columbus, OH: Department of Linguistics, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Schwarzchild, Roger. 1999. GIVENness, Avoid F, and other constraints on the placement of accent. Natural Language Semantics 7, 141–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stavrou, Melita. 1995. Epexegesis vs. apposition. Scientific yearbook of the Classics Department, 217–250. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Stavrou, Melita. 1996. Adjectives in Modern Greek: An instance of predication, or an old issue revisited. Journal of Linguistics 32, 79–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stavrou, Melita. 2009. Postnominal adjectives in Greek indefinite noun phrases. Ms., Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. [To appear In Brugè, Laura, Cardinaletti, Anna, Giusti, Giuliana, Munaro, Nicola & Poletto, Cecilia (eds.), Functional heads: Papers in honour of Guglielmo Cinque for his 60th anniversary, Oxford University Press.]Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1994. The noun phrase. In Kiefer, Ferenc & Kiss, Katalin. E. (eds.), The syntactic structure of Hungarian (Syntax & Semantics 27), 179–275. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szendrői, Kriszta. 2010. A flexible approach to discourse-related word order variations in the DP. Lingua 120, 864–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, Ianthi Maria & Stavrakaki, Stavroula. 1999. The effects of a morphosyntactic deficit in the determiner system: The case of a Greek SLI child. Lingua 108, 31–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velegrakis, Nikolaos. 2011. The syntax of Greek polydefinites. Ph.D. thesis, University College London.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1981. Argument structure and morphology. The Linguistic Review 1, 81–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1989. The anaphoric nature of theta-roles. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 425–256.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1994. Thematic structure in syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1997. Blocking and anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 28, 577–628.Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2004. Sentential negation and negative concord. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Zwarts, Joost. 1993. X-bar syntax, X-bar semantics. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar