Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:13:52.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Postnominal adjectives in Spanish DPs1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Ignacio Bosque
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense, Madrid and Universitat Autònoma, Barcelona
Carme Picallo
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense, Madrid and Universitat Autònoma, Barcelona

Extract

Starting from the traditional distinction between R(elational) and Q(ualifying) adjectives, we divide the former into two major subclasses: Th(ematic) and C(lassificatory) adjectives. This distinction has effects on semantic interpretation and word order. Th-adjectives obey the thematic hierarchy and C-adjectives follow patterns of subclassification of objects in different domains. R-adjectives are maximal projections mapped into specifier positions. Spanish, contrary to English, has overt raising for gender and number checking on the noun and the adjectives. R-adjectives are argued to form syntactic clusters by a series of adjunctions that satisfy antisymmetric c-command requirements and minimality constraints on movement.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bally, Ch. (1932). Linguistique générate et linguistique française (4th edn. 1965). Berne: Francke.Google Scholar
Bartning, I. (1980). Remarkes sur la syntaxe et la sémantique dé spseudo-adjectifs denominaux en français. Stockholm: Almkvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Beard, R. (1991). Decompositional composition: the semantics of scope ambiguities and ‘bracketing paradoxes’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2 195229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, J. (1993). Topics on the syntax of nominal structures across Romance. PhD.dissertation, City University of New York.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1967). Adjectives in English: attribution and predication. Lingua 18. 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosque, I. (1993). Sobre las diferencias entre los adjetivos relacionales y los calificativos. Revista Argentina de Lingiiistica 9. 948.Google Scholar
Bosque, I. (1994). Degree quantification and modal operators in Spanish. Paper presented at the 1993 Going Romance Meeting, Utrecht, and the 24th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Los Angeles, 1994.Google Scholar
Breslin, M. S. (1975). The process of adjectival attribution in French. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Brinker, J. H. (1974). L'aggetivo di relazione nell'italiano moderno. In Medici, M. & Sangregorio, A. (eds.) Fenomeni morfologici e sintattici nelFitaliano contemporaneo. (Vol. 1.) Roma: Bulzoni. 519.Google Scholar
Brucart, J. M. (1987). La elisión sintdctica en español. (Sèrie Lingüística.) Barcelona: Universitat Autonoma.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, A. & Giusti, G. (1991). Partitive ne and the QP-hypothesis. A case study. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 1.4. 119.Google Scholar
Chao, W. (1988). On ellipsis. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1993). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In Hale, K. & Keyser, S. (eds.) View from building 20. Essays in linguistics in honor of Syhain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 152.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (1980). On extraction from NP in Italian. Journal of Italian Linguistics 5. 4799.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (1994). On the evidence of partial movement in the Romance DP. In Cinque, G., Roster, J., Pollock, J.-Y., Rizzi, L. & Zanuttini, R. (eds.) Paths towards universal grammar: studies in honor of R. Kayne. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 85110.Google Scholar
Coates, J. (1971). Denominal adjectives: a study in syntactic relationships between modifier and head. Lingua 27. 160169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisma, P. (1990). Functional categories inside the NP: a study on the distribution of nominal modifiers. Ph.D. dissertation, Universita di Venezia.Google Scholar
Dirven, R. (1978). Defining semantic roles in deriving adjectives. In Abraham, W. (ed.) Valence, semantic case and grammatical relations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 339353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, A. & Longobardi, G. (1991). The syntax of noun phrases: configuration, parameters and empty categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giusti, G. (1992). La sintassi dei sintagma quantificali. Ph.D. dissertation, Università di Venezia.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hale, K. & Keyser, J. (1991). On the syntax of argument structure. Lexicon Project Working Papers 34. MIT.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. A. (1989). Gapping and grammatical relations. Journal of Linguistics 25. 5794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1987). The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 18. 369411.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. (1984). Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lago, J. (1984). La acumulación de adjetivos en la frase nominal del franés contemporáneo. Santiago: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
Larson, R. (1985). Bare NP adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry 16. 595621.Google Scholar
Lebeaux, D. (1986). The interpretation of derived nominals. Papers from the 22 Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 231247.Google Scholar
Levi, J. (1974). On the alleged idiosyncrasy of nonpredicate NPs. Papers from the 10th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 402415.Google Scholar
Levi, J. (1978). The syntax and semantics of complex nominals. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ljung, M. (1970). English denominal adjectives. (Gothenburg Studies in English 21.) Lund: University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Martí, N. (1993). Adverbial Modifiers in DP. Paper presented at the Second Workshop on the Syntax of Central Romance Languages, Barcelona.Google Scholar
Martí, N. (1994). Análisi de la construcció DE + SA en català. M. A. thesis, Universitat Autónoma, Barcelona.Google Scholar
Milner, J.-C. (1972). De la sintaxe à I'interprétation. Paris: Editions de Seuil.Google Scholar
Picallo, M. C. (1991). Nominals and nominalizations in Catalan. Probus 3. 279316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picallo, M. C. (1994). A mark on specificity in indefinite nominals. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 4. 143167.Google Scholar
Postal, P. (1969). Anaphoric islands. Papers from the 5th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 205239.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1990). Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ronat, M. (1974). Échelles de base et mutations en syntaxe française. These de troisiéme cycle, Universite de Paris VIIIGoogle Scholar
Rooryck, J. (1985). Gapping-zeugma in French and English: a non deletion analysis. Linguistic Analysis 15. 187229.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1972). Vadjectif de relation en français, italien, anglais et allemand. Etude comparée. Goppingen: Verlag Alfred Kümmerle.Google Scholar
Sola, Pujols J. (1994). Morphology and word order in Germanic languages. In Zwart, J. W. (ed.) Groningen Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 37. 209225.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1968). Adjectives and nominalization. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Vergnaud, J. R. & Zubizarreta, M. L. (1992). The definite determiner and the inalienable construction in French and in English. Linguistic Inquiry 23. 595652.Google Scholar
Warren, B. (1984a). Classifying adjectives. (Gothenburg Studies in English 56.) Lund: University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Warren, B. (1984b). The functions of modifiers of nouns. Quaderni di Semantica 5. 111122.Google Scholar
Warren, B. (1988). Ambiguity and vagueness in adjectives. Studia Linguistica 42. 122172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamparelli, R. (1993). Aspects of a ADJP = DP = CP hypothesis. Ms., University of Rochester.Google Scholar