Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T13:22:52.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Syllables and redundancy rules in generative phonology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Gillian Brown
Gillian Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Phonetics and Linguistics, University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper is concerned with two topics, the status of the syllable and the scope of redundancy rules, in generative phonology. We begin the discussion by examining material from Lugisu, a Bantu language of eastern Uganda, which will be used as the main language of exemplification. The simple noun in Lugisu is formed by the sequence: determiner, classifier, stem. The determiner is deleted before consonant-initial stems in some syntactic environments (and in isolation; examples 1 and 3, for example, show the sequence: classifier, stem). The first examples are from Meinhof's noun class 3 (Meinhof, 1932) where the determiner is /gu/ 3 and the classifier /mu/.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 1970 , pp. 1 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bazell, C. E., Catford, J. C., Halliday, M. A. K. & Robins, R. H. (eds.) (1966). In Memory of J. R. Firth. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1935). Language. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Cheng, R. L. (1966). Mandarin phonological structure. JL 2. 137–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1964). Current issues in linguistic theory. In Fodor, J. A. & Katz, J. L. (eds.) The Structure of Language. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, pp. 50–119.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968), The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., Halle, M. & Lukoff, F. (1956). On accent and juncture in English. In Halle, M., Lunt, H. & MacLean, H. (eds.) For Roman Jacobson. The Hague: Mouton & Co., pp. 65–81.Google Scholar
Fudge, E. C. (1967). The nature of phonological primes. JL 3. 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fudge, E. C. (1969). Mutation rules and ordering in phonology. JL 5. 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fudge, E. C. (forthcoming). Syllables. JL.Google Scholar
Halle, M. (1959). The Sound Pattern of Russian. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Halle, M. (1964). Phonology in generative grammar. In Fodor, J. A. & Katz, J. L. (eds.) The Structure of Language. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, pp. 334–353.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1958). A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jesperson, O. (1909). A Modern English Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1964). A phonetic study of West African Languages. (West African Language Monographs, I.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meinhof, C. (1932). (translated by van Warmelo, N. J.), Introduction to the Phonology of the Bantu Languages. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer, Ernst Vohsen.Google Scholar
Postal, P. M. (1968). Aspects of Phonological Theory. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Schachter, P. & Fromkin, V. (1968). A phonology of Akan: Akuapem, Asante and Fante. (Working Papers in Phonetics, 9.) Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
Stanely, R. (1967). Redundancy rules in phonology. Lg. 43. 393–436.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Linguistics as an exact science. In Language, Thought and Reality: Selected Papers. (Edited by Carroll, J. B..) Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 220–232.Google Scholar