Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-8cpv7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-08T07:23:44.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The implications of CEO power on the relationship between firm resources and innovation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2020

Fariss-Terry Mousa Open the ORCID record for Fariss-Terry Mousa [Opens in a new window] ,
Jaideep Chowdhury  and
Scott R. Gallagher
Fariss-Terry Mousa*
Affiliation:
Department of Management, College of Business, MSC 0205, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA
Jaideep Chowdhury
Affiliation:
Department of Finance and Business Law, College of Business, MSC 0203, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA
Scott R. Gallagher
Affiliation:
Department of Management, College of Business, MSC 0205, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: mousafx@jmu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examine the link between firm resources and firm innovation intensity, especially the drivers of innovation and organizational slack. We extend the organizational slack and innovation literature by examining its interplay with CEO power and industry level constraints on that power. We examine the influence of human resource slack, CEO power, and industry concentration on R&D intensity. Our study examines all publicly traded US firms over a 10-year period, giving us over 13,400 firm years to look at. Our results indicate that organizations with excess human capacity do on average show higher investments in R&D. However, we also find that in concentrated industries, where CEOs are less constrained by competitive pressure, powerful CEOs do interfere in this strategic choice and weaken the slack–innovation relationship. Even though CEO's in these situations may have sufficient slack resources, they appear inclined to reallocate such resources to purposes other than innovation.

Keywords

CEO powerinnovationexcess resourceshuman-resource slackindustry concentration

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , January 2023 , pp. 14 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abdel-Khalik, A. R. (2007). An empirical analysis of CEO risk aversion and the propensity to smooth earnings volatility. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 22(2), 201–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afuah, A. (2003). Innovation management: Strategies, implementation and profits. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, 99, 116–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Innovation, growth and survival. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13(4), 441–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigley, G. A., & Wiersema, M. F. (2002). New CEOs and corporate strategic refocusing: How experience as heir apparent influences the use of power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 707–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohn, R. (July–Aug 2000). Stop fighting fires. Harvard Business Review, 78(4), 83–91.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, L. J. (1981). On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6(1), 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (Eds.). (1988). The nature of expertise. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, W. M., & Klepper, S. (1996). Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(2), 232–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Core, J., & Guay, W. (1999). The use of equity grants to manage optimal equity incentive levels. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28(2), 151–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963/1992). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Daily, C. M., & Johnson, J. L. (1997). Sources of CEO power and firm financial performance: A longitudinal assessment. Journal of Management, 23(2), 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, F., Lohrke, F. T., Fornaciari, C. J., & Turner, R. A. (2004). Slack resources and firm performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 565–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review, 75(2), 332–337.Google Scholar
Demb, A., & Neubauer, F. (1992). The corporate board: Confronting the paradoxes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, J., & Smith, A. (1995). Agency costs and innovation some empirical evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(2), 383–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganuza, J., Llobet, G., & Dominguex, B. (2009). R&D in the pharmaceutical industry: A world of small innovations. Management Science, 55, 539–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greve, H. R. (2003). A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from Shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 685–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greve, H. R., & Mitsuhashi, H. (2007). Power and glory: Concentrated power in top management Teams. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1197–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, J. (1992). Innovation, firm size and firm age. Small Business Economics, 4, 37–44.Google Scholar
Haynes, K. T., & Hillman, A. (2010). The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 31(11), 1145–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herold, D. M., Jayaraman, N., & Narayanaswamy, C. R. (2006). What is the relationship between organizational slack and innovation?. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18, 372–392.Google Scholar
Hoffman, E. (2019). IBISWorld Industry Report 51721. ‘The proliferation of mobile phones has spurred demand for wireless services'. Retrieved July 25, 2019 from IBISWorld database.Google Scholar
Hu, H. W., Tam, O. K., & Tan, M. G. S. (2010). Internal governance mechanisms and firm performance in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(4), 727–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyer, B., & Davenport, T. H. (2008). Reverse engineering Google's innovation machine (cover story). Harvard Business Review, 86(4), 58–68.Google Scholar
Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110(2), 265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How scientists make sense. Chicago: Indiana.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecuona, J. R., & Reitzig, M. (2014). Knowledge worth having in ‘Excess’: The value of tacit and firm-specific human resource slack. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 954–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorsch, J. W., & Maclver, E. (1989). Pawns or potentates: The reality of America's corporate boards. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. (1981). Footnotes to organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 563–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzucato, M., & Tancioni, M. (2013). R&D. Patents and stock returns volatility. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 22(4), 811–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellahi, K., & Wilkinson, A. (2010). A study of the association between level of slack reduction following downsizing and innovation output. Journal of Management Studies, 47(3), 483–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishina, Y., Pollock, T. G., & Porac, J. F. (2004). Are more resources always better for growth? Resource stickiness in market and product expansion. Strategic Management Journal, 25(12), 1179–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moses, J. (2019). IBISWorld Industry Report 51711b. ‘Interrupted signal: the growing availability of online content will continue to threaten satellite providers'. Retrieved July 26, 2019 from IBISWorld database.Google Scholar
Mousa, F. T., & Chowdhury, J. (2014). The relationship between organizational slack and firm innovation: Revisited. American Journal of Business, 29(1), 26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1245–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1997). What is the optimum amount of organizational slack?: A study of the relationship between slack and innovation in multinational firms. European Management Journal, 15(6), 603–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the firm. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rechner, P. L., & Dalton, D. R. (1991). CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1977). Who gets power – and how they hold on to it: A strategic-contingency model of power. Organizational Dynamics, 5(3), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, F., & Ross, D. (1990). Industrial market structure and economic performance. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Singh, M., & Faircloth, S. (2005). The impact of corporate debt on long term investment and firm Performance. Applied Economics, 37(8), 875–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A., Houghton, S. M., Hood, J. N., & Ryman, J. A. (2006). Power relationships among top managers: Does top management team power distribution matter for organizational performance?. Journal of Business Research, 59(5), 622–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szewczyk, S. H., Tsetsekos, G. P., & Zantout, Z. (1996). The valuation of corporate R&D expenditures: Evidence from investment opportunities and free cash flow. Financial Management, 25(1), 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szulanski, G., & Cappetta, R. (2003). Stickiness: Conceptualizing, measuring, and predicting difficulties in the transfer of knowledge within organizations. In The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (pp. 513–534). Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tan, J. (2003). Curvilinear relationship between organizational slack and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese state enterprises. European Management Journal, 21(6), 740–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utterback, J. (1994). Mastering the dynamics of innovation: How companies can seize opportunities in the face of technological change. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.Google Scholar
Vanacker, T., Collewaert, V., & Paeleman, I. (2013). The relationship between slack resources and the performance of entrepreneurial firms: The role of venture capital and angel investors. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1070–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Hippel, E., Thomke, S., & Sonnack, M. (1999). Creating breakthroughs at 3M. Harvard Business Review, 77, 47–57.Google ScholarPubMed
Voss, G. B., Sirdeshmukh, D., & Voss, D. (2008). The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldman, D. E., & Jensen, E.J. (2001). Industrial organization: Theory and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar