Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T21:52:53.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anisotropic compressive properties and energy absorption of metal–resin interpenetrating phase composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2018

Bibo Yao Open the ORCID record for Bibo Yao [Opens in a new window] ,
Zhaoyao Zhou  and
Liuyang Duan
Bibo Yao
Affiliation:
National Engineering Research Center of Near-Net-Shape Forming for Metallic Materials, School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, People’s Republic of China; and Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
Zhaoyao Zhou*
Affiliation:
National Engineering Research Center of Near-Net-Shape Forming for Metallic Materials, School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, People’s Republic of China
Liuyang Duan
Affiliation:
National Engineering Research Center of Near-Net-Shape Forming for Metallic Materials, School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, People’s Republic of China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: zhyzhou@scut.edu.cn
Get access

Abstract

Metal–resin interpenetrating phase composites (IPCs) have been produced by spontaneously infiltrating unsaturated polyester resin into porous stainless steel fibrous preforms under vacuum conditions. The compressive behaviors of the IPCs were investigated and the fractures were examined. The compressive strength and elastic modulus increase with increasing fiber fraction. The structures, compressive behaviors, and energy absorption capacities of the IPCs exhibit anisotropy. A higher compressive strength, lower elastic modulus, and lower energy absorption efficiency are observed in the through-thickness direction. The energy absorption efficiency slightly decreases with increasing fiber fraction in a certain range rather than monotonically increasing or decreasing. The energy absorption efficiency in the in-plane direction is superior to that in the through-thickness direction. Finer fibers improve the strength and elastic modulus but have little influence on the energy absorption efficiency. Resin collapse, fiber necking, and debonding are the main failure types observed in the composites.

Keywords

metal–resin interpenetrating phase compositecompressive behaviorenergy absorption
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 33 , Issue 17 , 14 September 2018 , pp. 2477 - 2485
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Yi, P., Peng, L., Liu, N., Lai, X., and Ni, J.: A micromechanics elastic-plastic constitutive model for sintered stainless steel fiber felt. Mater. Des. 51, 876 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, W., Tang, Y., Yang, X., and Wan, Z.: Porous metal materials for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells—A review. Appl. Energy 94, 309 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, D., Scarpa, F., Ma, Y., Hong, J., and Mahadik, Y.: Dynamic mechanical behavior of nickel-based superalloy metal rubber. Mater. Des. 56, 69 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J., Yu, S., Zhu, X., Wei, M., Luo, Y., and Liu, Y.: The compressive properties of closed-cell Zn–22Al foams. Mater. Lett. 62, 683 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, F., Zhou, Z., Yao, B., and Xiao, Z.: Anisotropic compressive properties and energy absorption efficiency of porous twisted short fiber materials. Steel Res. Int. 87, 1534 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, P., Tan, Q., Wu, L., and He, G.: Compressive and pseudo-elastic hysteresis behavior of entangled titanium wire materials. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 527, 3301 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiao, J., Xi, Z., Tang, H., Wang, J., and Zhu, J.: Influence of porosity on quasi-static compressive properties of porous metal media fabricated by stainless steel fiber. Mater. Des. 30, 2737 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jhaver, R. and Tippur, H.: Processing, compression response and finite element modeling of syntactic foam based interpenetrating phase composite (IPC). Mater. Sci. Eng., A 499, 507 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiao, Y., Fan, N., Yu, Y., and Guo, P.: Experimental investigation on turning of double metal composite with network interpenetrating structure. Mater. Manuf. Processes 31, 653 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegner, L.D. and Gibson, L.J.: The mechanical behaviour of interpenetrating phase composites—III: Resin-impregnated porous stainless steel. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 43, 1061 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, F., Kim, S-M., Reddy, J.N., and Abu Al-Rub, R.K.: Modeling of elastoplastic behavior of stainless-steel/bronze interpenetrating phase composites with damage evolution. Int. J. Plast. 61, 94 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegner, L.D. and Gibson, L.J.: The fracture toughness behaviour of interpenetrating phase composites. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 43, 1771 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kishimoto, S., Wang, Q., Tanaka, Y., and Kagawa, Y.: Compressive mechanical properties of closed-cell aluminum foam–polymer composites. Composites, Part B 64, 43 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Periasamy, C., Jhaver, R., and Tippur, H.V.: Quasi-static and dynamic compression response of a lightweight interpenetrating phase composite foam. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 527, 2845 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cree, D. and Pugh, M.: Production and characterization of a three-dimensional cellular metal-filled ceramic composite. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 210, 1905 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinfried, M., Stephani, G., Luthardt, F., Adler, J., John, M., and Krombholz, A.: Hybrid foams—A new approach for multifunctional applications. Adv. Eng. Mater. 13, 1031 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Y., Zhang, H., Wang, A., Fu, H., Hu, Z., Wen, C., and Hodgson, P.: Compressive deformation and damage of Mg-based metallic glass interpenetrating phase composite containing 30–70 vol% titanium. J. Mater. Res. 25, 2192 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegner, L.D. and Gibson, L.J.: The mechanical behaviour of interpenetrating phase composites—II: A case study of a three-dimensionally printed material. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 42, 943 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, S., Liu, J., Luo, Y., and Liu, Y.: Compressive behavior and damping property of ZA22/SiCp composite foams. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 457, 325 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meneghetti, P. and Qutubuddin, S.: Synthesis, thermal properties and applications of polymer–clay nanocomposites. Thermochim. Acta 442, 74 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rout, A.K. and Satapathy, A.: Study on mechanical and tribo-performance of rice-husk filled glass–epoxy hybrid composites. Mater. Des. 41, 131 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kishimoto, S. and Shinya, N.: Development of metallic closed cellular materials containing polymers. Mater. Des. 21, 575 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y. and Gong, X-l.: Compressive behavior and energy absorption of metal porous polymer composite with interpenetrating network structure. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 16, s439 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Z., Yao, B., Duan, L., and Qin, J.: Production and anisotropic tensile behavior of resin–metal interpenetrating phase composites. Adv. Eng. Mater. 20, 1700669 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, K.H., Tsai, J.S., and Chang, K.W.: Interpenetrating polymer network of polyurethane and unsaturated polyester: Mechanical properties. J. Mater. Sci. 26, 5877 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daehn, G.S., Starck, B., Xu, L., Elfishawy, K.F., Ringnalda, J., and Fraser, H.L.: Elastic and plastic behavior of a co-continuous alumina/aluminum composite. Acta Mater. 44, 249 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherm, F., Völkl, R., Neubrand, A., Bosbach, F., and Glatzel, U.: Mechanical characterisation of interpenetrating network metal–ceramic composites. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 527, 1260 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Z., Yao, B., Duan, L., and Qin, J.: Production and anisotropic compressibility of 304 stainless steel fiber/ZA8 zinc alloy interpenetrating phase composites. J. Alloys Compd. 727, 146 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez de Salazar, J.M., Barrena, M.I., Morales, G., Matesanz, L., and Merino, N.: Compression strength and wear resistance of ceramic foams–polymer composites. Mater. Lett. 60, 1687 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, Q., Liu, P., Du, C., Wu, L., and He, G.: Mechanical behaviors of quasi-ordered entangled aluminum alloy wire material. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 527, 38 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liua, J., Yua, S., Zhu, X., Wei, M., Luo, Y., and Liu, Y.: Correlation between ceramic additions and compressive properties of Zn–22Al matrix composite foams. J. Alloys Compd. 476, 220 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stöbener, K. and Rausch, G.: Aluminium foam–polymer composites: Processing and characteristics. J. Mater. Res. 44, 1506 (2009).Google Scholar