Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:48:17.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of simultaneous B+ and N+2 implantation on microhardness, fatigue life, and microstructure in Fe–13Cr–15Ni base alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

E. H. Lee  and
L. K. Mansur
E. H. Lee
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Metals and Ceramics Division. P.O. Box 2008. Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
L. K. Mansur
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Metals and Ceramics Division. P.O. Box 2008. Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
Get access

Abstract

Microhardness and cantilever beam fatigue measurements were conducted on Fe–13Cr–15Ni base austenitic alloys that were implanted with boron and nitrogen ions either singly or simultaneously. The microstructure of the modified surface layer and dislocation slip modes after fatigue tests were investigated by optical and transmission electron microscopy. Both hardness and fatigue life were improved by ion implantation, but the greatest improvement was achieved when boron and nitrogen were implanted simultaneously. The degree of fatigue life improvement also varied with minor changes in the base alloying compositions: nitrogen was detrimental or ineffective in the presence of titanium, and boron was much more effective in the presence of molybdenum. Comparison of slip band morphology between the compression and tension cycles indicated that implantation improved the reversibility of surface slip and delayed crack initiation.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 4 , Issue 6 , December 1989 , pp. 1371 - 1378
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Destefani, James D.Adv. Mater. Prog. 134 (4), 39 (1988).Google Scholar
2Kujore, A.Chakrabortty, S.B. and Starke, E. A. Jr. , Nucl. Instrum. Methods 182/183, 949 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Dimigen, H. and Kobs, K.Mater. Sci. Engr. 69, 181 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Mendez, J.Violan, P. and Denanot, M. F.Nucl. Instrum. Methods in Phys. Res. B19/20, 232 (1987).Google Scholar
5Welsch, G. and Wang, J. J.Thin Solid Films 107, 305 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Jata, Kumar V. and Starke, Edgar A. Jr. , J. of Metals August, 23 (1983).Google Scholar
7Lewis, M.B.Allen, W.R.Buhl, R.A.Packan, N.H.Cook, S. W. and Mansur, L.K. Triple Ion Beam Facility, ORNL/TM-10867 (1988).Google Scholar
8Oliver, W.C.MRS Bulletin, Sept./Oct., 15 (1986).Google Scholar
9Wong, Ray Hwa, “Bending Fatigue of Steels for Fusion Applications,” Master of Science Thesis, Auburn University, AL, August 1986.Google Scholar
10Spitznagel, J. A.Hall, B.O.Doyle, N.J.Jayram, Raman, Wallace, R. W.Townsend, J. R. and Miller, M.Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 27, 597 (1984).Google Scholar
11Bakhru, H.Gibson, W. and Burr, C.Nucl. Instrum. Methods 182/183, 959 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Hu, Weu-Wei, Clayton, C.R. and Herman, H.Scripta Metall. 12, 697 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Jata, Kumar V.Han, J.Starke, E. A. Jr. , and Legg, K. O.Scripta Metall. 17, 479 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Hohmuth, K.Richter, E. and Rauschenbach, B.Mater. Sci. Engr. 69, 191 (1985).Google Scholar
15Vardiman, R. G. and Cox, J. E.Acta Metall. 33 (11), 2033 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Herman, Herbert, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 182/183, 887 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Fayeulle, S. and Treheux, D.Nucl. Instrum. Methods in Phys. Res. B19/20, 216 (1987).Google Scholar
18Vardiman, R.G. and Kant, R.A.J. Appl. Phys. 53 (1), 690 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Madakson, Peter B.Mater. Sci. Engr. 69, 167 (1985).Google Scholar
20Knystautus, Emile J.Amarjit Singh, and Michel Fiset, Nucl. Instrum. Methods in Phys. Res. B19/20, 213 (1987).Google Scholar