Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T05:17:30.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improving wettability of polycarbonate and adhesion with aluminum by Ar+ ion irradiation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Seok-Keun Koh ,
Seok-Kyun Song ,
Won-Kook Choi ,
Hyung-Jin Jung  and
Sung-Nam Han
Seok-Keun Koh
Affiliation:
Ceramics Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 131, Cheongryang, Seoul 130-650, Korea
Seok-Kyun Song
Affiliation:
Ceramics Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 131, Cheongryang, Seoul 130-650, Korea
Won-Kook Choi
Affiliation:
Ceramics Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 131, Cheongryang, Seoul 130-650, Korea
Hyung-Jin Jung
Affiliation:
Ceramics Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 131, Cheongryang, Seoul 130-650, Korea
Sung-Nam Han
Affiliation:
Aju Engineering, Dalsung-Keun, Kyungbuk, Korea
Get access

Abstract

Improving wettability of the polycarbonate (PC) surface to triple distilled water has been carried out by Ar+ ion irradiation with blowing oxygen gas. The amount of Ar+ was changed from 1014 to 5 × 1016 ions/cm2 at 1 keV energy by a Kaufman-type ion source. Contact angle of the water to PC has been reduced from 78°to 50°with Ar+ irradiation, and to 12°with Ar+ irradiation in various vacuum pressures adjusted by oxygen gas flow rate (0-4 sccm). Strong O-H stretching vibration peaks at about 3370 cm−1 on FT-IR spectra of the polymer appeared after the surface treatments, and the wetting angle of the treated PC was returned to its value (78°) when the PC was exposed in air environment. The minimum contact angles were maintained with the same value when the irradiated polymers were kept in dilute HCl solution. The improved wettability and surface chemical reaction by Ar+ ion irradiation with oxygen was explained by the formation of a hydrophilic functional group. Enhanced adhesion between aluminum and PC was confirmed by the scotch tape test, and was discussed with relation between the hydrophilic group on the polymer surface and the deposited metal.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 10 , Issue 9 , September 1995 , pp. 2390 - 2394
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Bachraan, B.J. and Vasile, M.J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 7 (4), 2709 (1989).Google Scholar
2Pae, K.D., Bhateja, S.K., and Gilbert, J.R., J. Polym. Sci. B25, 717 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Bhateja, S. K., Andrews, E. H., and Young, R. J., J. Polym. Sci. 21, 523 (1983).Google Scholar
4Bhateja, S.K., J. Macromol. Sci. Phys. B 22 (1), 159 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Forrest, S.R., Kaplan, M. L., Schmidt, P. H., Venkatesan, T., and Lovinger, A.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 41 (8), 708 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Venkatesan, T., Dynes, R. C., Wilkens, B., White, A.E., Gibson, J. M., and Hamm, R., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Bl, 599 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Wang, G.H., Li, X.J., Zhu, Y.Z., Liu, Q.S., Hu, N.X., Gu, X.S., and Wang, Q., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B7/8, 497 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Wang, G. H., Pan, G. Q., and Dou, L., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B27, 410 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Puglisi, O., Licciardello, A., Calcagno, L., and Foti, G., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B19/20, 865 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Fakes, D.W., Newton, J.M., Watts, J.F., and Edgell, M.J., Surf. Interface Analysis 10, 416 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Schalek, R., Hlavacek, M., and Grummon, D.S., in Photons and Low Energy Particles in Surface Processing, edited by Ashby, C. I. H., Brannon, J. H., and Pang, S.W. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 236, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992), p. 335.Google Scholar
12Wintersgill, M.C., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Bl, 595 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Loh, I.H., Klausner, M., Baddour, R.F., and Cohen, R.E., Polym. Eng. Sci. 27 (11), 861 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Briggs, D., Ranee, D. G., Kendall, C. R., and Blythe, A. R., Polymer 21, 895 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Wrobel, A.M., Kryszewski, M., Rakowski, W., Okoniewski, M., and Kubacki, Z., Polymer 19, 908 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Clark, D.T. and Dilks, A., J. Polym. Sci. 15, 2321 (1977).Google Scholar
17Leclercq, B., Sotton, M., Baszkin, A., and Saraga, T. M., Polymer 18, 675 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Amouroux, J., Goldman, M., and Revoil, M. F., J. Polym. Sci. 19, 1373 (1982).Google Scholar
19Koh, S.K., Pae, K.D., Stoffel, N.G., and Hart, D.L., Polym. Eng. Sci. 30, (3), 137 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Chou, N. J., Dong, D. W., Kim, J., and Liu, A. C., J. Electrochem. Soc: Solid State Sci. Technol. 131 (10), 2335 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Flitsch, R. and Shih, D. Y., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 8 (3), 2376 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Mitchell, I.V., Williams, J.S., Smith, P., and Elliman, R.G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 44 (2), 193 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Kellock, A.J., Nyberg, G. L., and Williams, J.S., Vacuum 35 (12), 625 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Mazzoldi, P. and Arnold, G. W., Ion Beam Modification of Insulators (Elsevier Science, New York, 1987), p. 585.Google Scholar
25Koh, S-K., Han, S-N., and Jung, H-J., Applied U.S. Patent.Google Scholar
26lacona, F., Garilli, M., Marietta, G., Puglisi, O., and Pignataro, S., J. Mater. Res. 6, 861 (1991).Google Scholar
27Baglin, J.E.E., Schrott, A. G., Thompson, R. D., Tu, K.N., and Segmüller, A., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B19/20, 782 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Baglin, J.E.E., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B65, 119 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Gerenser, L.J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 6 (5), 2897 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30Ho, P. S., Hahn, P. O., Bartha, J. W., Rubloff, G. W., FLeGoues, . K., and Silverman, B.D., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 3 (3), 739 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Tombrello, T.A., Nucl. Instrum. Methods 218, 679 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Griffith, J. E., Qiu, Y., and Tombrello, T. A., Nucl. Instrum. Methods 198, 607 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Livi, R.P., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B10/11, 545 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Jacobson, S., Jonsson, B., and Sundqvist, B., Thin Solid Films 107, 89 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35Wie, C. R., Shi, C. R., Mendenhall, M. H., Livi, R. P., Vreeland, T. Jr., and Tombrello, T.A., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B9, 20 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36Koh, S. K., Pae, K. D., and Caracciolo, R., Polym. Eng. Sci. 32 (8), 558 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar