Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:37:40.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of anodization time on the surface modifications on α-Fe2O3 photoanode upon anodization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2016

Kelebogile Maabong ,
Yelin Hu ,
Artur Braun ,
Augusto G.J. Machatine  and
Mmantsae Diale
Kelebogile Maabong*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0028, South Africa; Laboratory of High Ceramics, Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, CH-8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland; and Department of Physics, University of Botswana, UB 0022 Gaborone, Botswana
Yelin Hu
Affiliation:
Laboratory of High Ceramics, Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, CH-8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland; and Laboratory for Photonics and Interfaces, EPFL, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
Artur Braun
Affiliation:
Laboratory of High Ceramics, Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, CH-8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
Augusto G.J. Machatine
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0028, South Africa
Mmantsae Diale*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0028, South Africa; and Laboratory of High Ceramics, Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, CH-8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
*
a)Address all correspondence to these authors. e-mail: kelemaabong@gmail.com
b)e-mail: mmantsaediale@up.ac.za
Get access

Abstract

In searching for a suitable semiconductor material for hydrogen production via photoelectrochemical water splitting, α-Fe2O3 received significant attention as a promising photoanode due to its band gap (∼2.1 eV), good stability, low cost, and natural occurrence. α-Fe2O3 thin films were prepared by economic and facile dip coating method and subsequently subjected to an anodic potential of 700 mV versus Ag/AgCl in 1M KOH for different anodization times (1, 10, and 900 min) under illumination. X-ray diffractometry revealed increase in crystallites size from ∼31 nm for nanoparticles in pristine state to ∼38 and 44 nm after anodization for 1 and 900 min, respectively. A clear positive correlation between anodization time and grain (particle) size was observed from field emission gun scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy (AFM); longer exposure time to anodizing conditions resulted in larger grains. Grain size increased from ∼57.9 nm in pristine state to ∼153.5 nm after anodization for 900 min. A significant smoothening of the surface with increase in anodization time was evident from AFM analysis.

Keywords

crystallographic structuregrain sizemorphology
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 31 , Issue 11: Focus Issue: Advanced Materials and Structures for Solar Fuels , 14 June 2016 , pp. 1580 - 1587
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Klahr, B., Gimenez, S., Fabregat-Santiago, F., Bisquert, J., and Hamann, T.W.: Electrochemical and photoelectrochemical investigation of water oxidation with hematite electrodes. Energy Environ. Sci. 5(6), 7626 (2012).Google Scholar
Grätzel, M.: Photoelectrochemical cells. Nature 414(15), 338 (2001).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sivula, K., Le Formal, F., and Gratzel, M.: Solar water splitting: Progress using hematite (alpha-Fe2O3) photoelectrodes. ChemSusChem 4(4), 432 (2011).Google Scholar
Katz, M.J., Riha, S.C., Jeong, N.C., Martinson, A.B.F., Farha, O.K., and Hupp, J.T.: Toward solar fuels: Water splitting with sunlight and “rust”? Coord. Chem. Rev. 256(21–22), 2521 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cesar, I., Sivula, K., Kay, A., Zboril, R., and Grätzel, M.: Influence of feature size film thickness and silicon doping on the perfomance of nanostructured hematite photoanodes for solar water splitting. J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 772 (2009).Google Scholar
Fujishima, A. and Honda, K.: Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 238(5358), 37 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duret, A. and Grätzel, M.: Visible light-induced water oxidation on mesoscopic α-Fe2O3 films made by ultrasonic spray pyrolysis. J. Phys. Chem. B 109(36), 17184 (2005).Google Scholar
Bora, D.K., Braun, A., and Constable, E.C.: “In rust we trust”. Hematite—The prospective inorganic backbone for artificial photosynthesis. Energy Environ. Sci. 6(2), 407 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, A., Sivula, K., Bora, D.K., Zhu, J., Zhang, L., Grätzel, M., Guo, J., and Constable, E.C.: Direct observation of two electron holes in a hematite photoanode during photoelectrochemical water splitting. J. Phys. Chem. B 116(32), 16870 (2012).Google Scholar
Dotan, H., Sivula, K., Grätzel, M., Rothschild, A., and Warren, S.C.: Probing the photoelectrochemical properties of hematite (α-Fe2O3) electrodes using hydrogen peroxide as a hole scavenger. Energy Environ. Sci. 4(3), 958 (2011).Google Scholar
Boudoire, F., Toth, R., Heier, J., Braun, A., and Constable, E.C.: Hematite nanostructuring using electrohydrodynamic lithography. Appl. Surf. Sci. 305, 62 (2014).Google Scholar
Le Formal, F., Tétreault, N., Cornuz, M., Moehl, T., Grätzel, M., and Sivula, K.: Passivating surface states on water splitting hematite photoanodes with alumina overlayers. Chem. Sci. 2(4), 737 (2011).Google Scholar
Morrisons, S.R.: The Chemical Physics of Surface (Plenum Press, New York, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rangaraju, R.R., Panday, A., Raja, K.S., and Misra, M.: Nanostructured anodic iron oxide film as photoanode for water oxidation. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42(13), 135303 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bora, D.K., Braun, A., Erat, S., Ariffin, A.K., Löhnert, R., Sivula, K., Töpfer, J., Grätzel, M., Manzke, R., Graule, T., and Constable, E.C.: Evolution of an oxygen near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure transition in the upper hubbard band in α-Fe2O3 upon electrochemical oxidation. J. Phys. Chem. C 115(13), 5619 (2011).Google Scholar
Rangaraju, R.R., Raja, K.S., Panday, A., and Misra, M.: An investigation on room temperature synthesis of vertically oriented arrays of iron oxide nanotubes by anodization of iron. Electrochim. Acta 55(3), 785 (2010).Google Scholar
Garcla, E.A.: Dynamical diffusion model to simulate the oxide crystallization and grain growth during oxidation of zirconium at 573 and 623 K. J. Nucl. Mater. 224, 299 (1995).Google Scholar
Wei, X-w. and Chen, C-y.: Influence of oxidation heat on hard anodic film of aluminum alloy. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 22(11), 2707 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graeve, D., Terryn, H., and Thompson, G.E.: Influence of heat transfer on anodic oxidation of aluminium. J. Appl. Electrochem. 32, 73 (2002).Google Scholar
Abd-Elnaiem, A.M., Mebed, A.M., Gaber, A., and Abdel-Rahim, M.A.: Effect of the anodization parameters on the volume expansion of anodized aluminum films. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 8, 10515 (2013).Google Scholar
Saijo, A., Murakami, K., Hino, M., and Kanadani, T.: Effect of environmentally friendly anodization on the mechanical properties and microstructure of AZ91D magnesium alloy. Mater. Trans. 49(5), 903 (2008).Google Scholar
Chatman, S., Pearce, C.I., and Rosso, K.M.: Charge transport at Ti-doped hematite (001)/aqueous interfaces. Chem. Mater. 27(5), 1665 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yogi, A. and Varshney, D.: Cu doping effect of hematite (α-Fe2−x Cu x O3): Effect on the structural and magnetic properties. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 21, 38 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Y., Bora, D.K., Boudoire, F., Häussler, F., Grätzel, M., Constable, E.C., and Braun, A.: A dip coating process for large area silicon-doped high performance hematite photoanodes. J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 5(4), 043109 (2013).Google Scholar
Aroutiounian, V.M., Arakelyan, V.M., Shahnazaryan, G.E., Hovhannisyan, H.R., Wang, H., and Turner, J.A.: Photoelectrochemistry of tin-doped iron oxide electrodes. Solar Energy 81(11), 1369 (2007).Google Scholar
Ahn, H-J., Kwak, M-J., Lee, J-S., Yoon, K-Y., and Jang, J-H.: Nanoporous hematite structures to overcome short diffusion lengths in water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 19999 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z., Wang, K., Xiao, L., Chen, X., Ren, X., Lu, J., and Zhuang, L.: A morphology effect of hematite photoanode for photoelectrochemical water oxidation. RSC Adv. 4, 37701 (2014).Google Scholar
Schrebler, R., Ballesteros, L.A., Gomez, H., Grez, P., Cordova, R., Munoz, E., Schrebler, R., Ramos-Barrado, J.R., and Dalchiele, E.A.: Electrochemically grown self-organized hematite nanotube arrays for photoelectrochemical water splitting. J. Electrochem. Soc. 161(14), H903 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, H., Zhang, S., Ma, Q., Qin, S., Wan, L., Xu, J., and Miao, S.: Dye-sensitized solar cells based on flower-shaped α-Fe2O3 as a photoanode and reduced graphene oxide–polyaniline composite as a counter electrode. RSC Adv. 3(38), 17228 (2013).Google Scholar
Gajda-Schrantz, K., Tymen, S., Boudoire, F., Toth, R., Bora, D.K., Calvet, W., Gratzel, M., Constable, E.C., and Braun, A.: Formation of an electron hole doped film in the alpha-Fe2O3 photoanode upon electrochemical oxidation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15(5), 1443 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braun, A., Chen, Q., Flak, D., Fortunato, G., Gajda-Schrantz, K., Gratzel, M., Graule, T., Guo, J., Huang, T.W., Liu, Z., Popelo, A.V., Sivula, K., Wadati, H., Wyss, P.P., Zhang, L., and Zhu, J.: Iron resonant photoemission spectroscopy on anodized hematite points to electron hole doping during anodization. ChemPhysChem 13(12), 2937 (2012).Google Scholar
Maabong, K., Machatine, A.G., Hu, Y., Braun, A., Nambala, F.J., and Diale, M.: Morphology, structural and optical properties of iron oxide thin film photoanodes in photoelectrochemical cell: Effect of electrochemical oxidation. Phys. B 480, 91 (2016).Google Scholar
Heiroth, S., Frison, R., Rupp, J.L.M., Lippert, T., Barthazy Meier, E.J., Müller Gubler, E., Döbeli, M., Conder, K., Wokaun, A., and Gauckler, L.J.: Crystallization and grain growth characteristics of yttria-stabilized zirconia thin films grown by pulsed laser deposition. Solid State Ionics 191(1), 12 (2011).Google Scholar
Mote, V.D., Purushotham, Y., and Dole, B.N.: Williamson-Hall analysis in estimation of lattice strain in nanometer-sized ZnO particles. J. Theor. Appl. Phys. 6(6), 1 (2012).Google Scholar
Caglar, Y., Ilican, S., Caglar, M., Yakuphanoglu, F., Wu, J., Gao, K., Lu, P., and Xue, D.: Influence of heat treatment on the nanocrystalline structure of ZnO film deposited on p-Si. J. Alloys Compd. 481(1–2), 885 (2009).Google Scholar
Jackson, M.J. and Ahmed, W.: Anodization: A promising nano-modification technique of titanium-based implants for orthopedic applications. In Surface Engineered Surgical Tools and Medical Devices, Jackson, M. and Ahmed, W. eds.; Springer: 2007; p. 21.Google Scholar
Shei, S-C., Chang, S-J., and Lee, P-Y.: Rinsing effects on successive ionic layer adsorption and reaction method for deposition of ZnO thin films. J. Electrochem. Soc. 158(3), H208 (2011).Google Scholar
Cornell, R.M. and Schwertmann, U.: The Iron Oxides: Structure, Properties, Occurrences, and Uses (Wiley-VCH, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, F., Zhang, L., and Metzger, R.M.: On the growth of highly ordered pores in anodized aluminum oxide. Chem. Mater. 10, 2470 (1998).Google Scholar
Belkhedkar, M.R. and Ubale, A.U.: Preparation and characterization of nanocrystalline α-Fe2O3 thin films grown by successive ionic layer adsorption and reaction method. Int. J. Mater. Chem. 5(4), 109 (2014).Google Scholar
Tamboli, S.H., Rahman, G., and Joo, O-S.: Influence of potential, deposition time and annealing temperature on photoelectrochemical properties of electrodeposited iron oxide thin films. J. Alloys Compd. 520, 232 (2012).Google Scholar
Arutyunyan, V.M.: Physical properties of the semiconductor-electrolyte interface. Sov. Phys. Usp. 32(6), 521 (1989).Google Scholar