Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:01:11.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructural characterization and crystallization kinetics of (1-x)TeO2-0.10CdF2-xPbF2 (x = 0.05, 0.10, and 0.15 mol) glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Demet Tatar*
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak 34469 Istanbul, Turkey
M. Lutfi Öveçoğlu
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak 34469 Istanbul, Turkey
Gonul Özen
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Letters, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak 34469 Istanbul, Turkey
Scott A. Speakman
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: demettatar@yahoo.com
Get access

Abstract

Microstructural characterization and crystallization kinetics of (1-x)TeO2-0.10CdF2-xPbF2 (x = 0.05, 0.10, and 0.15 in molar ratio) glasses were investigated using differential thermal analysis (DTA), x-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive spectrometer (SEM/EDS), and absorbance spectroscopy techniques. For all of the glass compositions only one exothermic peak was observed on the DTA plots, and on the basis of the XRD and Raman spectrophotometry investigations it was understood that they refer to the formation of the α-TeO2 phase. SEM/EDS investigations revealed the presence of oriented needle-like α-TeO2 crystals in the 0.85TeO2-0.10CdF2-0.05PbF2 glass, rectangle-shaped α-TeO2 crystals in the 0.80TeO2-0.10CdF2-0.10PbF2 glass, and disoriented needle-like crystals in the 0.75TeO2-0.10CdF2-0.15PbF2 glass. DTA analyses were carried out at different heating rates, and the Avrami constants for all of the glasses were approximately 1. The activation energy calculations and SEM investigations demonstrated that the formation of the crystalline phases occurred via surface crystallization mechanism for all of the glasses. Activation energies for crystallization in these glasses were determined from the modified Kissinger plots and were found to vary between 67 and 183 kJ/mol. The addition of PbF2 as a network modifier into the glass structure contributes to the intensity of the Raman peaks change and forced the transition of the glass network from TeO4 trigonal bipyramid units to the TeO3 trigonal pyramid structural units.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.El-Mallawany, A.H.: Tellurite Glasses Handbook (CRS Press, London, 2002).Google Scholar
2.Pedlikova, J., Lezal, D., Kostka, P., and Zavadil, J.: Glasses based on TeO2 and Pb+2: Preparation and characterization. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 326327, 42 (2003).Google Scholar
3.O'Donnell, M.: Tellurite and fluorotellurite glasses for active and passive fibreoptic waveguides. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Nottingham, UK, 2004.Google Scholar
4.Öz, B., Kabalci, I., Öveçoğlu, M.L., and Özen, G.: Thermal properties and crystallization behavior of some TeO2-K2O glasses. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 27, 1823 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Rivero, C., Stegeman, R., Richardson, K., Stegeman, G., Turri, G., Bass, M., Thomas, P., Udovic, M., Cardinal, T., Fargin, E., Couz, M., Jain, H., and Miller, A.: Influence of modifier oxides on the structural and optical properties of binary TeO2 glasses. J. Appl. Phys. 101, 023526 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Udovica, M., Thomasa, P., A.Mirgorodskya, Duranda, O., Soulisa, M., Massona, O., Merle-Mejeana, T., and Champarnaud-Mesjarda, J.C.: Thermal characteristics, Raman spectra and structural properties of new tellurite glasses within the Bi2O3–TiO2–TeO2 system. J. Solid State Chem. 179, 3252 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Silva, M.A.P., Messaddeq, Y., Briois, V., Poulain, M., Villian, F., and Ribeiro, S.J.L.: Synthesis and structural investigations on TeO2-CdF2-PbF2 glasses and transparent glass-ceramics. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 63, 605 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Powder Diffraction Files: Card No. 42–1365, Database Edition, The International Centre for Diffraction Data (ICDD).Google Scholar
9.Öveçoğlu, M.L., Özen, G., Demirata, B., and Genç, A.: Microstructural characterization and crystallization kinetics of (1-x)TeO2-xLiCl (x=0.6–0.4 mol) glasses. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 27, 1823 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Eşin, C., Kabalci, I., Öveçoğlu, M.L., and Özen, G.: Crystallization behavior of (1-x) TeO2-xBaO (x=0.10, 0.15 and 0.25 in molar ratio) glasses. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 27, 1797 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Sokolov, V.O., Plotnichenko, V.G., and Dianov, E.M.: Structure of WO3–TeO2 glasses. Inorg. Mater. 43(2), 194 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Charton, P. and Armand, P.: X-ray absorption and Raman characterizations of TeO2-Ga2O3 glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 333, 307 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Komatsu, T., Kim, H.G., and Mohri, H.: Raman scattering study on local structures of Te4+ and Nb5+ in LiNbO3-TeO2 glasses. J. Mater. Sci. 15, 2026 (1996).Google Scholar
14.Öz, B., Öveçoğlu, M.L., Kabalci, I., and Özen, G.: Microstructural characterization and crystallization kinetics of (1-x) TeO2-xK2O (x = 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20 mol) glasses. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 27, 3239 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Komatsu, T. and Mohri, H.: Raman scattering spectra and optical properties of tellurite glasses and crystalline phases containing PbO and CdO. J. Phys. Chem. Glasses 40(5), 257 (1999).Google Scholar
16.Silva, M.A.P., Messaddeq, Y., Ribeiro, S.J.L., Poulain, M., Villain, F., and Briois, V.: Structural studies on TeO2-PbO glasses. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 62, 1055 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Kissenger, H.E.: Variation of peak temperature with heating rate in differential thermal analysis. J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 57(4), 217 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Matusita, K. and Sakka, S.: Kinetic study on crystallization of the glass by DTA-criterion on application of Kissinger plot. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 3839, 741 (1980).Google Scholar
19.Yukimitu, K., Oliveria, R.C., Araujo, E.B., Moraes, J.C.S., and Avanci, L.H.: DSC studies on crystallization mechanisms of tellurite glasses. Thermochim. Acta 426, 157 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Marotta, A., Saiello, S., and Buri, A.: Remarks on determination of the Avrami exponent by non-isothermal analysis. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 57, 473 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Jeonga, E.D., Baea, J.S., Honga, T.E., Leeb, K.T., Ryub, B.K., Komatsuc, T., and Kima, H.G.: Thermal properties and crystallization kinetics of tellurium oxide based glasses. J. Ceram. Process. Res. 8(6), 417 (2007).Google Scholar
22.Kabalci, I., Özen, G., Öveçoğlu, M.L., and Sennaroğlu, A.: Thermal study and linear optical properties of (1-x)TeO2-(x)PbF2 (x=0.10,0.15 and 0.25 mol) glasses. J. Alloys Compd. 419, 294 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar