Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:06:44.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructure characteristics of spray-formed high speed steel and its evolution during subsequent hot deformation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2016

Lin Lu
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
Long-gang Hou*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
Jin-xiang Zhang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
He-bin Wang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
Hua Cui
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
Jin-feng Huang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
Yong-an Zhang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Non-Ferrous Metals and Process, General Research Institute for Non-Ferrous Metals, Beijing 100088, China
Ji-Shan Zhang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: lghou@skl.ustb.edu.cn
Get access

Abstract

The microstructural evolution of spray-formed high speed steel during hot deformation was investigated as well as the effects of spray forming parameters on the porosity formation. Four distinct zones are identified in the as-deposited material, and interstitial porosity is present in the bottom and peripheral zones, while gas-related porosity is mainly found in the central zone. It can keep the porosity at a minimum value by using the optimum parameters, e.g., the average porosity of central zone is 3.7% for a superheat of 170 °C and a gas-to-metal flow rate of 0.7. During hot deformation at 1150 °C, the amount of porosity can be obviously decreased by increasing the height reduction which also plays a key role in breaking up eutectic carbides. The critical height reduction for the breakdown of the eutectic carbides is 50%, the dominant mechanism being mechanical fragmentation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ernst, I.C. and Duh, D.: ESP4 and TSP4, a comparison of spray formed with powdermetallurgically produced cobalt free high-speed steel of type 6W-5Mo-4V-4Cr. J. Mater. Sci. 39, 6831 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, I.C. and Duh, D.: Properties of cold-work tool steel X155CrVMo12-1 produced via spray forming and conventional ingot casting. J. Mater. Sci. 39, 6835 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanlon, D.N., Rainforth, W.M., Sellars, C.M., Price, R., Gisborne, H.T., and Forrest, J.: The structure and properties of spray formed cold rolling mill work roll steels. J. Mater. Sci. 33, 3233 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavernia, E.J. and Grant, N.J.: Spray deposition of metals: A review. Mater. Sci. Eng. 98, 381 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, A., Matthaei-Schulz, E., Spangel, S., Vetters, H., and Mayr, P.: Analysis of spray formed tool steels. Materialwiss. Werkstofftech. 34, 478 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Igharo, M. and Wood, J.V.: Investigation of M2 high speed steel produced by Osprey process. Powder Metall. 32, 124 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, F., Zhou, X., Shi, H.S., and Fan, J.F.: Microstructure of the spray formed Vanadis 4 steel and its ultrafine structure. Mater. Charact. 59, 592 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, P.S.: Solidification in spray forming. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 38, 1520 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewlay, B.P. and Cantor, B.: The relationship between thermal history and microstructure in spray-deposited tin-lead alloys. J. Mater. Res. 6, 1433 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, W.D. and Lavernia, E.J.: Modeling of porosity during spray forming. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 226–228, 8 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavernia, E.J. and Wu, Y.: Spray Atomization and Deposition (John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1996).Google Scholar
Müller, H.R., Ohla, K., Zauter, R., and Ebner, M.: Effect of reactive elements on porosity in spray-formed copper-alloy Billets. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 383, 78 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, W.D. and Lavernia, E.J.: Modeling of porosity during spray forming: Part I. Effects of processing parameters. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 29, 1085 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, W.D. and Lavernia, E.J.: Modeling of porosity during spray forming: Part II. Effects of atomization gas chemistry and alloy compositions. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 29, 1097 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellendt, N., Stelling, O., Uhlenwinkel, V., von Hehl, A., and Krug, P.: Influence of spray forming process parameters on the microstructure and porosity of Mg2Si rich aluminum alloys. Materialwiss. Werkstofftech. 41, 532 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bricknell, R.H.: The structure and properties of a nickel-base superalloy produced by osprey atomization-deposition. Metall. Trans. A 17, 583 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathur, P., Apelian, D., and Lawley, A.: Analysis of the spray deposition process. Acta Metall. 37, 429 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, P.S., Kim, W.T., and Cantor, B.: Spray forming of aluminium-copper alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 134, 1111 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesquita, R.A. and Barbosa, C.A.: Spray forming high speed steel—properties and processing. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 383, 87 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodenburg, C., Krzyzanowski, M., Brynon, J.H., and Rainforth, W.M.: Hot workability of spray-formed AISI M3:2 high-speed steel. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 386, 420 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, H.M., Lee, Z.H., White, D.R., and Lavernia, E.J.: On the evolution of porosity in spray-deposited tool steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 31, 725 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spangel, S., Matthaei-Schulz, E., Schulz, A., Vetters, H., and Mayr, P.: Influence of carbon and chromium content and preform shape on the microstructure of spray formed steel deposits. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 326, 26 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, L., Huang, J.F., Hou, L.G., Zhang, J.X., Wang, H.B., Cui, H., and Zhang, J.S.: Effect Of niobium on the microstructure and properties of spray formed M3:2 high speed steel. J. Univ. Sci. Technol. Beijing 36, 1292 (2014).Google Scholar
Pryds, N.H., Hattel, J.H., Pedersen, T.B., and Thorborg, J.: An integrated numerical model of the spray forming process. Acta Mater. 50, 4075 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghomashchi, M.R. and Sellars, C.M.: Microstructural changes in as-cast M2 grade high speed steel during hot forging. Metall. Trans. A 24, 2171 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghomashchi, M.R. and Sellars, C.M.: Microstructural changes in as-cast M2 grade high speed steel during high temperature treatment. Met. Sci. 18, 44 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar