Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:23:42.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphology and growth mechanism of alumina whiskers in aluminum-based metal matrix composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Y-F. Li ,
C-D. Qin  and
D. H. L. Ng
Y-F. Li
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
C-D. Qin
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
D. H. L. Ng
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
Get access

Abstract

A process has been invented for growing alumina (Al2O3) whiskers in the matrix of the aluminum-based metal matrix composite by the internal oxidation reaction between aluminum (Al) and molybdenum oxide (MoO3) at 850 °C. The whiskers were formed during the firing stage and distributed uniformly throughout the metal matrix. The fractional volume of the whiskers was about 30%, and their average size was 1 μm in diameter and 10 μm in length. The growth mechanism of the Al2O3 whiskers was studied. It was found that the nutrient for the growth of the whiskers was supplied from the molten Al at the base of the whiskers where they reacted with MoO3 forming the Al2O3 whiskers and the Al–Mo intermetallic phases.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 14 , Issue 7 , July 1999 , pp. 2997 - 3000
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Hanabe, M.R. and Aswath, P.B., J. Mater. Res. 11, 1562 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Gonzalez-Doncel, G. and Sherby, O. D., Acta. Metall. Mater. 41, 2797 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Nukami, T., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 17, 267 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Taheri-Nassaj, E., Kobashi, M., and Choh, T., Scripta Mater. 34, 1257 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Taya, M. and Arsenault, R.J., Metal Matrix Composites (Pergamon Press, 1989), pp. 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Mortensen, A. and Jin, I., Inter. Mater. Rev. 37, 101 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Urquhart, A.W., Mater. Sci. Eng. A144, 75 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Mitra, R., Chiou, W.A., Fine, M.E., and Weertman, J.R., J. Mater. Res. 8, 2380 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Choi, Y., Mullins, M.E., Wijayatilleke, K., and Lee, J.K., Metall. Trans. A 23A, 2387 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Wagner, R.S. and Ellis, W.C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 4, 89 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Milewski, J.V., Gac, F.D., Petrovic, J.J., and Skaggs, S.R., J. Mater. Sci. 20, 1160 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Seitz, F., Phys. Rev. 79, 1003 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Matsubara, I., Funahashi, R., Ogura, T., Yamashita, H., Tauru, K., and Kawai, T., J. Cryst. Growth 141, 131 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Liang, Y.J. and Che, Y.C., Handbook of Thermodynamic Data of Inorganic Substances (Dong Bei University Press, P.R. China, 1993).Google Scholar
15.Lee, R.E., Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis (Prentice Hall, 1993), pp. 392–394.Google Scholar
16.Massalski, T.B., Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1987), pp. 133–134.Google Scholar