Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:44:32.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Production of Al–Ti–C grain refiner alloys by reactive synthesis of elemental powders: Part II. Grain refining performance of alloys and secondary processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

H. J. Brinkman ,
F. Zupanič ,
J. Duszczyk  and
L. Katgerman
H. J. Brinkman
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology, Laboratory of Materials Science, Rotterdamseweg 137,2628 AL Delft, The Netherlands
F. Zupanič
Affiliation:
University of Maribor, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Smetanova 17, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
J. Duszczyk
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology, Laboratory of Materials Science, Rotterdamseweg 137,2628 AL Delft, The Netherlands
L. Katgerman
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology, Laboratory of Materials Science, Rotterdamseweg 137,2628 AL Delft, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

This article, Part II in a series, reports on the grain refining performance of the Al–Ti–C alloys produced by reactive synthesis. Grain refinement was tested as a function of the following parameters in the reaction synthesis process: Ti content, Ti/C ratio, and cooling rate after the reaction. The grain refining performance of the alloys in the as-synthesized condition was limited due to either a shortage of TiC particles or an insufficient amount of aluminum matrix. Dilution of the alloys to a nominal composition of 3 wt% Ti, followed by extrusion improved the grain refinement to the level of commercially available Al–Ti–C grain refining alloys. A prerequisite for successful secondary processing is that the conversion of carbon is completed in the reaction synthesis; otherwise Al4C3 is formed rather than TiC.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 15 , Issue 12 , December 2000 , pp. 2628 - 2635
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.McCartney, D.G., Int. Mater. Rev. 34, 247 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Schumacher, P., Greer, A.L., Worth, J., Evans, P.V., Kearns, M.A., Fisher, P., and Green, A.H., Mater. Sci. Technol. 14, 394 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Karantzalis, A. and Kennedy, A.R., Mater. Sci. Technol. 14, 1092 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Easton, M. and John, D. St., Met. Mater. Trans. A 30A, 1613 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Sato, K., Fleming, M.C., Met. Mater. Trans. A 29A, 1707 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Hardman, A. and Hayes, F.H., Mater. Sci. Forum 217–222, 247 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Brinkman, H.J., Zupanic, F., Duszczyk, J., and Katgerman, L., J. Mat. Res. 12, 2621 (2000).Google Scholar
8.Frage, N., Frumin, N., Levin, L., Polak, M., and Daniel, M.P., Met. Mater. Trans. A 29A, 1341 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Gotman, I., Koczak, M.J., and Shtessel, E., Mater. Sci. Eng. A A187, 189 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar