Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T20:56:08.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Synthesis and sintering of SiC under high pressure and high temperature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

S. K. Bhaumik
Affiliation:
High Pressure Laboratory, Materials Science Division, National Aerospace Laboratories, Bangalore 560 017, India
C. Divakar
Affiliation:
High Pressure Laboratory, Materials Science Division, National Aerospace Laboratories, Bangalore 560 017, India
A. K. Singh
Affiliation:
High Pressure Laboratory, Materials Science Division, National Aerospace Laboratories, Bangalore 560 017, India
Get access

Abstract

Starting from elemental powders, simultaneous synthesis and compaction of SiC were conducted at 3 GPa pressure and temperatures in the range 2100–2900 K. The sintered compacts were characterized by x-ray diffraction, microhardness measurements, and microscopic studies. The efficiency of formation of SiC was dependent on the particle size of the silicon powder, crystallinity of the reactant carbon, molar ratio of silicon and carbon, and synthesis temperature and time. Carbon in excess of the stoichiometric amount was required to obtain compacts free from residual silicon. The SiC samples, with a Si: C molar ratio 1: 1.05, prepared at 2100 K for 300 s had a density and hardness of 3.21 g/cm3 (98.8% of theoretical density) and 22 GPa, respectively. The crystal structure of the SiC depended on the synthesis temperature. Pure β–SiC in the temperature range 2100–2500 K, and a mixture of α– and β–SiC above 2500 K were obtained. The β–SiC was highly crystalline and nearly defect-free.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.The Cambridge Encyclopedia, edited by Crystal, D. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994).Google Scholar
2.Walton, J. D. Jr, and Poulos, N. E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 42, 40 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Krapf, S., Ber. deut. keram. Ges. 31, 18 (1954).Google Scholar
4.Abramovici, R.A. and Enache, M., Keram. Z 19, 699 (1967).Google Scholar
5.Merzhanov, A.G. and Borovinskaya, I. P., Dokl. Chem (Eng. Trans.) 204, 429 (1972).Google Scholar
6.Crider, J. F., Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. 3, 519 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Munir, Z.A., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 67, 354 (1988).Google Scholar
8.Holt, J. B. and Dunmead, S. D., in Annual Review of Materials Science, edited by Huggins, R. A., Giordmaine, J. A., and Wachtman, J. B. Jr, (Annual Reviews Inc., CA, 1991), Vol. 21, p. 305.Google Scholar
9.Subrahmanyam, J. and Vijayakumar, M., J. Mater. Sci. 27, 6249 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Miyamoto, Y., Koizumi, M., and Yamada, O., Commun. Am. Ceram. Soc. 67, C224 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Yamada, O., Miyamoto, Y., and Koizumi, M., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 64, 319 (1985).Google Scholar
12.Bhaumik, S.K., Divakar, C., Mohan, M., and Singh, A.K., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 67, 3679 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Hillard, J. E., in Quantitative Microscopy, edited by DeHoff, R. T. and Rhines, F.N. (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1968), p. 45.Google Scholar
14.Lancin, M., Anxionnaz, F., Thibault-Desseaux, J., Stutz, D., and Griel, P., J. Mater. Sci. 22, 1150 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar