Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T17:58:11.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Synthesis of CuO nanostructures on zeolite-Y and investigation of their CO2 adsorption properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2017

Cansu Boruban  and
Emren Nalbant Esenturk
Cansu Boruban
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Middle East Technical University, Ankara 06800, Turkey
Emren Nalbant Esenturk*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Middle East Technical University, Ankara 06800, Turkey; and Micro and Nanotechnology Program, Middle East Technical University, Ankara 06800, Turkey
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: emren@metu.edu.tr
Get access

Abstract

Copper(II) oxide (CuO) nanoparticles (NPs) in two different morphologies, spiky and spherical, were synthesized on zeolite-Y by a modified impregnation method, and their CO2 adsorbing capabilities were investigated under standard conditions (1 atm and 298 K). The properties and CO2 adsorption performances of the hybrid systems were characterized by transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray, X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, atomic absorption spectroscopy, and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller analyses. The microscopy analyses showed that spiky nanostructures have a length of approximately 450 nm, and the spherical ones are approximately 18 nm in diameter. Quantitative analyses demonstrated that CuO NPs in both morphologies on the zeolite surface led to an improvement in their CO2 adsorption capacities. This enhancement is mainly due to the higher CO2 chemisorption capability of CuO NP–zeolite systems compared to that of bare zeolite. The presence of spiky and spherical CuO NPs on the zeolite surface resulted in increases of 112% and 86% in the amount of chemisorbed CO2 on the zeolite-Y surfaces, respectively.

Keywords

adsorptionnanostructurezeolite
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 32 , Issue 19 , 16 October 2017 , pp. 3669 - 3678
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Contributing Editor: Akira Nakajima

References

REFERENCES

Rackley, S.A.: Carbon Capture and Storage (Butterworth-Heinemann/Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaithwas, A., Prasad, M., Kulshreshtha, A., and Verma, S.: Industrial wastes derived solid adsorbents for CO2 capture: A mini review. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 90, 1632 (2012).Google Scholar
Figueroa, J.D., Fout, T., Plasynski, S., McIlvried, H., and Srivastava, R.D.: Advances in CO2 capture technology. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2, 9 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tekin, A., Karalti, O., and Karadas, F.: A metal dicyanamide cluster with high CO2/N2 selectivity. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 228, 153 (2016).Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Singh, R., and Webley, P.A.: Alkali and alkaline-earth cation exchanged chabazite zeolites for adsorption based CO2 capture. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 111, 478 (2008).Google Scholar
Schitco, C., Seifollahi Bazarjani, M., Riedel, R., and Gurlo, A.: Ultramicroporous silicon nitride ceramics for CO2 capture. J. Mater. Res. 30, 2958 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, H., Yi, H., Tang, X., Liu, H., and Zhou, X.: Interactive effect for simultaneous removal of SO2, NO, and CO2 in flue gas on ion exchanged zeolites. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52, 6778 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Othman Ali, I.: Preparation and characterization of copper nanoparticles encapsulated inside ZSM-5 zeolite and NO adsorption. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 459, 294 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, C-H., Hsi, H-C., and Lin, C-C.: Control of mercury emissions from coal-combustion flue gases using CuCl2-modified zeolite and evaluating the cobenefit effects on SO2 and NO removal. Fuel Process. Technol. 126, 138 (2014).Google Scholar
Freund, H.J. and Roberts, M.W.: Surface chemistry of carbon dioxide. Surf. Sci. Rep. 25, 225 (1996).Google Scholar
Isahak, W.N.R.W., Ramli, Z.A.C., Ismail, M.W., Ismail, K., Yusop, R.M., Hisham, M.W.M., and Yarmo, M.A.: Adsorption-desorption of CO2 on different type of copper oxides surfaces: Physical and chemical attractions studies. J. CO2 Util. 2, 8 (2013).Google Scholar
Mat, H.: Khairul Sozana Nor Kamarudin Hanapi Bin Hamdan: Zeolite as Natural Gas Adsorbents (Universiti Teknologi Malasia, Johar, Malaysia, 2007).Google Scholar
Jeon, H., Min, Y.J., Ahn, S.H., Hong, S-M., Shin, J-S., Kim, J.H., and Lee, K.B.: Graft copolymer templated synthesis of mesoporous MgO/TiO2 mixed oxide nanoparticles and their CO2 adsorption capacities. Colloids Surf., A 414, 75 (2012).Google Scholar
Baltrusaitis, J., Schuttlefield, J., Zeitler, E., and Grassian, V.H.: Carbon dioxide adsorption on oxide nanoparticle surfaces. Chem. Eng. J. 170, 471 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zukal, A., Pastva, J., and Čejka, J.: MgO-modified mesoporous silicas impregnated by potassium carbonate for carbon dioxide adsorption. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 167, 44 (2013).Google Scholar
Aziz, B., Zhao, G., and Hedin, N.: Carbon dioxide sorbents with propylamine groups–silica functionalized with a fractional factorial design approach. Langmuir 27, 3822 (2011).Google Scholar
Georgieva, V., Anfray, C., Retoux, R., Valtchev, V., Valable, S., and Mintova, S.: Iron loaded EMT nanosized zeolite with high affinity towards CO2 and NO. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 232, 256 (2016).Google Scholar
Molyanyan, E., Aghamiri, S., Talaie, M.R., and Iraji, N.: Experimental study of pure and mixtures of CO2 and CH4 adsorption on modified carbon nanotubes. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 13, 2001 (2016).Google Scholar
Bezerra, D.P., Da Silva, F.W.M., De Moura, P.A.S., Sousa, A.G.S., Vieira, R.S., Rodriguez-Castellon, E., and Azevedo, D.C.S.: CO2 adsorption in amine-grafted zeolite 13X. Appl. Surf. Sci. 314, 314 (2014).Google Scholar
Han, K.K., Zhou, Y., Chun, Y., and Zhu, J.H.: Efficient MgO-based mesoporous CO2 trapper and its performance at high temperature. J. Hazard. Mater. 203–204, 341 (2012).Google Scholar
Dou, B., Song, Y., Liu, Y., and Feng, C.: High temperature CO2 capture using calcium oxide sorbent in a fixed-bed reactor. J. Hazard. Mater. 183, 759 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phiwdang, K., Suphankij, S., Mekprasart, W., and Pecharapa, W.: Synthesis of CuO nanoparticles by precipitation method using different precursors. Energy Procedia 34, 740 (2013).Google Scholar
Zahmakiran, M. and Özkar, S.: Preparation and characterization of zeolite framework stabilized cuprous oxide nanoparticles. Mater. Lett. 63, 1033 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoja Razavi, R. and Loghman-Estarki, M.R.: Synthesis and characterizations of copper oxide nanoparticles within zeolite Y. J. Cluster Sci. 23, 1097 (2012).Google Scholar
Kim, B.J., Cho, K.S., and Park, S.J.: Copper oxide-decorated porous carbons for carbon dioxide adsorption behaviors. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 342, 575 (2010).Google Scholar
Zahmakiran, M., Durap, F., and Özkar, S.: Zeolite confined copper(0) nanoclusters as cost-effective and reusable catalyst in hydrogen generation from the hydrolysis of ammonia-borane. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35, 187 (2010).Google Scholar
Xu, J.F., Ji, W., Shen, Z.X., Tang, S.H., Ye, X.R., Jia, D.Z., and Xin, X.Q.: Preparation and characterization of CuO nanocrystals. J. Solid State Chem. 147, 516 (1999).Google Scholar
Yao, W-T., Yu, S-H., Zhou, Y., Jiang, J., Wu, Q-S., Zhang, L., and Jiang, J.: Formation of uniform CuO nanorods by spontaneous aggregation: Selective synthesis of CuO, Cu2O, and Cu nanoparticles by a solid−liquid phase arc discharge process. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 14011 (2005).Google Scholar
Ghijsen, J., Tjeng, L.H., van Elp, J., Eskes, H., Westerink, J., Sawatzky, G.A., and Czyzyk, M.T.: Electronic structure of Cu2O and CuO. Phys. Rev. B 38, 11322 (1988).Google Scholar
Zhang, Y.C., Tang, J.Y., Wang, G.L., Zhang, M., and Hu, X.Y.: Facile synthesis of submicron Cu2O and CuO crystallites from a solid metallorganic molecular precursor. J. Cryst. Growth 294, 278 (2006).Google Scholar
Parhizkar, M., Singh, S., Nayak, P.K., Kumar, N., Muthe, K.P., Gupta, S.K., Srinivasa, R.S., Talwar, S.S., and Major, S.S.: Nanocrystalline CuO films prepared by pyrolysis of Cu-arachidate LB multilayers. Colloids Surf., A 257–258, 277 (2005).Google Scholar
Scrocco, M.: Satellite structure in the X-ray photoelectron spectra of CuO Cu2O. Chem. Phys. Lett. 63, 52 (1979).Google Scholar
Baltrusaitis, J., Jensen, A.J.H., and Grassian, V.: FTIR spectroscopy combined with isotope labeling and quantum chemical calculations to investigate adsorbed bicarbonate formation following reaction of carbon dioxide with surface hydroxyl groups on Fe2O3 and Al2O3 . J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 12005 (2006).Google Scholar
Su, C. and Suarez, D.L.: In situ infrared speciation of adsorbed carbonate on aluminum and iron oxides. Clays Clay Miner. 45, 814 (1997).Google Scholar
Dantas, T.L.P., Luna, F.M.T., Silva, I.J., de Azevedo, D.C.S., Grande, C.A., Rodrigues, A.E., and Moreira, R.F.P.M.: Carbon dioxide–nitrogen separation through adsorption on activated carbon in a fixed bed. Chem. Eng. J. 169, 11 (2011).Google Scholar
Su, W., Zhang, J., Feng, Z., Chen, T., Ying, P., and Li, C.: Surface phases of TiO2 nanoparticles studied by UV Raman spectroscopy and FT-IR spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 7710 (2008).Google Scholar
Pirngruber, G.D., Raybaud, P., Belmabkhout, Y., Čejka, J., Zukal, A., Arean, C.O., and Nachtigall, P.: The role of the extra-framework cations in the adsorption of CO2 on faujasite Y. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12, 13534 (2010).Google Scholar
Godhani, D.R., Nakum, H.D., Parmar, D.K., Mehta, J.P., and Desai, N.C.: A hierarchical zeolite-Y hampered metallo-ligand complexes for selective oxidation: A mechanistic point of view. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 235, 233 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institute of Standards and Technology. Available at: http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/ (n.d.) (accessed July 14, 2017).Google Scholar
Xie, J., Huang, M., and Kaliaguine, S.: Characterization of basicity in alkali cation exchanged faujasite zeolites: An XPS study using chloroform as a probe molecule. Appl. Surf. Sci. 115, 157 (1997).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Boruban and Esenturk supplementary material

Boruban and Esenturk supplementary material 1

Download Boruban and Esenturk supplementary material(File)
File 2.7 MB