Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T01:29:12.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact Fracture of Polymer-Filled Braided Composite Tubes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2019

S. F. Hwang Open the ORCID record for S. F. Hwang [Opens in a new window]  and
H. L. Yu
S. F. Hwang*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Yunlin University of Science and TechnologyDouliu, Yunlin 64002, Taiwan, ROC
H. L. Yu
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Yunlin University of Science and TechnologyDouliu, Yunlin 64002, Taiwan, ROC
*
*Corresponding author (hwangsf@yuntech.edu.tw)
Get access

Abstract

Three types of polymer including polyurethane, polyethylene, and polysulfone were used as filler inside composite tubes to evaluate their effects on the crashworthiness. The composite tube consisting of carbon fiber fabric and polyurethane was fabricated by resin transfer molding and subjected to impact loading. In addition, the finite element analysis with progressive failure and delamination was used to simulate the crushing behavior of the polymer-filled composite tube. From the comparison between experiment and simulation, the finite element analysis is reliable, could reasonably describe the crushing behavior of the polymer-filled tube, and has nice prediction on the crashworthiness performance. From both the experiment and simulation results, the polyethylene-filled composite tube has clearly higher specific absorbed energy than the hollow composite tube, and polyethylene could be considered as an effective filler. However, the other two types of polymer filler have no clear effect.

Keywords

braided composite tubecrashworthinesspolymer fillerfinite element analysis
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , June 2020 , pp. 305 - 313
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Khalkhali, A., Masoumi, A., Darvizeh, A., Jafari, M. and shiri, A., “Experimental and Numerical Investigation into the Quasi-static Crushing Behavior of the S-shape Square Tubes,” Journal of Mechanics, 27, pp.585–596 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. D., Jones, N. and Abramowicz, W., “A Theoretical Analysis for the Quasi-static Axial Crushing of Top-hat and Double-hat Thin-walled Sections,” International Journal of Mechanical Science, 41, pp. 209–233 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowicz, W. and Jones, N., “Dynamic Progressive Buckling of Circular and Square Tubes,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 4, pp. 243–270 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuter, C., and Tröster, T., “Crashworthiness and Numerical Simulation of Hybrid Aluminum CFRP Tubes under Axial Impact,” Thin-Walled Structures, 117, pp. 1–9 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisagni, C., “Experimental Investigation of the Collapse Modes and Energy Absorption Characteristics of Composite Tubes,” International Journal of Crashworthiness, 14, pp. 365–378 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuter, C., Sauerland, K. H. and Tröster, T., “Experimental and Numerical Crushing Analysis of Circular CFRP Tubes under Axial Impact Loading,” Composite Structures, 154, pp. 33–44 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siromani, D., Henderson, G., Mikita, D., Mirarchi, L., Park, R., Smolko, J., Awerbuch, J. and Tan, T. M., “An Experimental Study on the Effect of Failure Trigger Mechanisms on the Energy absorption Capability of CFRP Tubes under Axial Compression,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 64, pp. 25–35 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, J. and Wang, X., “Numerical and Experimental Investigations on the Axial Crushing Response of Composite Tubes,” Composite Structures, 91, pp. 222–228 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrefor, C. J., Vaxiri, R., Poursartip, A. and Xiao, X., “Simulation of Progressive Damage Development in Braided Composite Tubes under Axial Compression,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 38, pp. 2247–2259 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Q., Xing, H., Ju, Y., Qu, Z. and Li, Q., “Quasi-static Axial Crushing and Transverse Bending of Double Hat Shaped CFRP Tubes,” Composite Structures, 117, pp. 1–11 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrefor, C., Vaxiri, R. and Xiao, X., “Finite Element Modelling of the Progressive Cushing of Braided Composite Tubes under Axial Impact,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 37, pp. 662–672 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, T., Pearce, G. M. K., Prusty, B. G., Kelly, D. W. and Thomson, R. S., “Pressurised Composite Tubes as Variable Load Energy Absorbers,” Composite Structures, 120, pp. 346–357 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Q., Qu, Z., Mo, Z., Li, Q. and Qu, D., “Experimental Investigation into Dynamic Axial Impact Responses of Double Hat Shaped CFRP Tubes,” Composites Part B: Engineering, 79, pp. 494–504 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochelski, S. and Gotowicki, P., “Experimental Assessment of Energy Absorption Capability of Carbon-epoxy and Glass-epoxy Composites,” Composite Structures, 87, pp. 215–224 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boria, S., Scattina, A. and Belingardi, G., “Axial Energy Absorption of CFRP Truncated Cones”, Composite Structures, 130, pp. 18–28 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, G., Li, S., Liu, Q., Li, G. and Li, Q., “Experimental Study on Crashworthiness of Empty/Aluminum Foam/Honeycomb-filled CFRP Tubes,” Composite Structures, 152, pp. 969–993 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z., Sun, W., Zhao, Y. and Hou, S., “Crashworthiness of Different Composite Tubes by Experiments and Simulations”, Composites Part B: Engineering, 143, pp. 86–95 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, Y. and Xu, Y., “Improvement of Crash Energy Absorption of 2D Braided Composite Tubes through an Innovative Chamfer External Triggers”, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 111, pp. 11–20 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siromani, D., Awerbuch, J. and Tan, T. M., “Finite Element Modeling of the crushing Behavior of Thin-walled CFRP Tubes under Axial Compression,” Composites Part B: Engineering, 64, pp. 50–58 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuter, C., Sauerland, K. H. and Tröster, T., “Experimental and Numerical Crushing Analysis of Circular CFRP Tubes under Axial Impact Loading”, Composite Structures, 174, pp. 33–44 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, S.-H., Yu, H.-L., Liu, Y.-J., Chen, Y., Chen, S.-C. and Hsieh, Y.-C., “Progressive Failure of Metal-Composite Hybrid Wheels under Impact”, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 32, pp. 223–229 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, S.-F. and Liu, H.-T., “Prediction of Elastic Constants of Carbon Fabric/Polyurethane Composites,” Solid State Phenomena, 258, 233–236 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, F.-K. and Chang, K.-Y., “A Progressive Damage Model for Laminated Composites Containing Stress Concentration”, Journal of Composite Materials, 21, 834–855 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar